Ojangole v Uganda [2001] UGSC 10 (23 March 2001)

# Ojangole v Uganda [2001] UGSC 10 (23 March 2001) [ Share this document on WhatsApp opens in new tab __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Ojangole+v+Uganda+%5B2001%5D+UGSC+10+%2823+March+2001%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2001%2F10%2Feng%402001-03-23) [ Share this document on X opens in new tab __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Ojangole+v+Uganda+%5B2001%5D+UGSC+10+%2823+March+2001%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2001%2F10%2Feng%402001-03-23) [ Share this document on Facebook opens in new tab __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/10/eng@2001-03-23) [ Share this document on LinkedIn opens in new tab __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/10/eng@2001-03-23) [ Share this document by email __](mailto:?subject=Take%20a%20look%20at%20this%20document%20from%20ULII:%20Ojangole%20v%20Uganda%20\[2001\]%20UGSC%2010%20\(23%20%E2%80%A6&body=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/10/eng@2001-03-23) __Save [ Download PDF (1.6 MB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/10/eng@2001-03-23/source) Report a problem ##### Is there something wrong with this document? Problem category *Incorrect informationMissing informationNo PDF downloadDocument is emptyDocument is not accessible on my deviceOther What's the problem? * Your email address * CancelReport problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (1.6 MB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/10/eng@2001-03-23/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Ojangole v Uganda [2001] UGSC 10 (23 March 2001) Copy citation __Save * __Document detail * __Related documents * __Citations \- / 1 Citation Ojangole v Uganda [2001] UGSC 10 (23 March 2001) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2001] UGSC 10 Copy Court [Supreme Court of Uganda](/en/judgments/UGSC/) Judges [Oder, JSC](/en/judgments/all/?judges=Oder%2C%20JSC) Judgment date 23 March 2001 Language English Summary ###### Flynote * Criminal law Read full summary ###### Case summary The gist of the appeal was that the appellant had not been correctly identified. The court observed that the court had properly directed itself as to the law applicable and re-evaluated the evidence. The appeal was thereby dismissed. __ ##### Ask AI Ask questions and understand this document faster using AI. __Ask AI * * * Skip to document content **Loading PDF...** 100% This document is 1.6 MB. Do you want to load it? Load document ##### Error loading PDF Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF. Reload page [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2001/10/eng@2001-03-23/source.pdf) Error: #### __Related documents #### More documents like this one __Suggestions generated by AI. This feature is not currently available. ▲ To the top >