Case Law[2024] ZMHC 267Zambia
Collins Zulu v Mercy Chansa (2024/HPF/D285) (13 May 2024) – ZambiaLII
Judgment
-J-1
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR ZAMBIA 2024 / HPF / D285
AT THE PRINCIPAL REGISTRY
FAMILY & CHILDREN'S COURT DIVISION
(Divorce Jurisdiction)
r-.. A
BETWEEN:
I
n·
PETITIONER
COLLINS ZULU
I
1 3 MAY :::4
AND
MERCY CHANSA RESPONDENT
BEFORE HONOURABLE LADY JUSTICE MWAMBA CHANDA THIS 13TH
DAY OF MAY, 2024
APPEARANCES:
For the Petitioner In person
For the Respondent In person
JUDGMENT
LEGISLATION REFERRED TO:
1. THE MATRIMONIAL CAUSES ACT NO. 20 OF 2007 OF THE LAWS OF
ZAMBIA
2. THE MATRIMONIAL CAUSES RULES 1973
On 30th April, 2024 Collins Zulu the petitioner herein filed a divorce petition pursuant to Section 8 and .9 (1) (e) of the Matrimonial
Causes Act No. 20 of 2007 of the Laws of Zambia against the respondent Mercy Chansa. The petition was premised on the ground
-J-2
that the parties had lived apart for a continuous period of at least five years immediately preceding the presentation of the petition.
The petition showed that the parties were lawfully married on 14th
August, 2004 at Praise Christian Centre, UNZA Chapel in the City and Province Lusaka in the Republic of Zambia. The petitioner stated that they last lived together as husband and wife Plot No. 23 Katope
Street, Chelston in Lusaka and were both domiciled in Zambia.
That there were no children born during the subsistence of marriage.
That there were no previous proceedings in any Court in Zambia with reference to the said marriage between the petitioner and the respondent.
That were no proceedings continued in any Court outside Zambia which were in respect of the said marriage or were capable of affecting its validity.
The petitioner implored the Court to dissolve their marriage as the parties herein had lived apart for a continuous period of at least five years since August, 2008. The petitioner further prayed for each party to bear their own costs.
The respondent did not file an Answer to the petition but signed a consent to have the divorce granted.
l
-J-3
,
On application by the petitioner, the matter was entered on the special procedure list on 3rd May, 2024 pursuant to Rule 33(3) (ii) of the Matrimonial Causes Rules 1973.
Upon considering the petition herein, the Court is satisfied that the marriage between the petitioner and respondent has broken down irretrievably. This is on the ground that the parties herein have lived apart for a continuous period of at least five (5) years immediately preceding the presentation of this petition. I am also satisfied that the dissolution of this marriage will not result in any financial or other hardship on the respondent as it has been shown that she has not been dependant on the petitioner during the period of their separation. In view of the foregoing the petitioner is hereby granted a decree nisi which shall become absolute after the prescribed statutory period of six (6 ) weeks.
Each party to bear their own costs.
I order accordingly.
Dated at Lusaka this 13th day of May, 2024.
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Mwamba Chanda
.o.
&O
JUDGE
Similar Cases
Hope Gladys Thailashi v Chitalu Simbaya (2024/HPF/D033) (15 April 2024)
– ZambiaLII
[2024] ZMHC 273High Court of Zambia86% similar
Patrick Mwanza v Deborah C Sefuka (2024/HPPF/D020) (25 March 2024)
– ZambiaLII
[2024] ZMHC 272High Court of Zambia84% similar
Trace Zita Siisii v Brian Mulenga Malasha (2024/HPF/D232) (14 June 2024)
– ZambiaLII
[2024] ZMHC 274High Court of Zambia84% similar
Simbarashe Nyashanu v Inonge Siamwala (2024/HPF/D221) (14 May 2024)
– ZambiaLII
[2024] ZMHC 266High Court of Zambia84% similar
Mercy Mbutwana Sunkutu v Reagan Bwalya Sunkutu (2024/HPF/D390) (23 October 2024)
– ZambiaLII
[2024] ZMHC 276High Court of Zambia83% similar