Case Law[2024] ZMHC 87Zambia
Anslem Silwamba (Suing as Administrator of the estate of the late Kenani Silwamba Silverius) v Kalahari Trans Zambia Limited and Anor (2022/HP/1903) (30 May 2024) – ZambiaLII
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR ZAMBIA 2022/HP/1903
AT THE PRINCIPAL REGISTRY
(CIVIL JURISDICTION)
BETWEEN:
ANSLEM SILWAMBA PLAINTIFF
Suing as Administrator of the estate of the late Kenani Silwamba
AND
KALAHARI TRANS ZAMBIA LIMITED 1 ST DEFENDANT
TIMOTHY SHAWA 2ND DEFENDANT
Before the Hon. Mrs. Justice R. Chibbabbuka on the 30th May, 2024.
For the Plaintiffs: Messrs Zambezi Chambers l4'or the Defendants: Messrs Mukoloba Mwansa Advocates
RULING
Legislation referred to:
The High Courl Act, Chapter 27 of the Laws ofZ ambia.
1.0 Introduction
This matter was dismissed for want of prosecution by this court's order of 29Lh
June, 2023 for failure to comply with the court's order for directions issued on
23rd March, 2023. The plaintiff on 13th July, 2023 filed an application to review this court's order of 29th ,June, 2023. The application was filed by summons pursuant to Order 39 Rule 1 of the High Court Rules, Chapter 27 of the Laws of
Zambia.
Rl
2.0 The Plaintiff's Affidavit in Support.
The application is supported by an affidavit deposed to by Ignitious Tindi who deposes that: following the court's order for directions issued on 28th March,
2023, the plaintiff complied with the court's order except for the filing of the witness statement. That the plaintiff on 16th May, 2023, filed an application for variation and extension of time fixed for filing witness statements but that before that application could be heard, Justice P. Yangailo who presided over the matter was transferred to the Economic Crimes Division. That he was shocked to receive the order of 29th June, 2023, dismissing this matter for want of prosecution.
2.1 The Plaintiff's Supporting Arguments
In support of the application, the plaintiff filed skeleton arguments wherein counsel argued that Order 39 Rule 1 of the High Court Rules vests this court with the power to review its own decisions where there are sufficient grounds to do so. That the court dismissed the matter on the basis that the plaintiff had failed to comply with the order for directions when in fact he had. Counsel prayed that this court reviews and sets aside its order of 29th June, 2023.
3.0 At the Hearing
At the hearing, counsel restated the arguments contained in the skeleton e arguments. He prayed that the order of 29th June, 2023 be reviewed.
4.0 Decision of the Court
I am indebted to counsel for the arguments. I have carefully considered the same.
The application herein is made pursuant to Order 39 Rules 1 of the High Court
Rules, of the High Court Act, Chapter 27 of the Laws of Zambia, which provides that:
R2
"(l)Any Judge may, upon such grounds as he shall consider sufficient, review any judgment or decision given by him (except where either party shall have obtained leave to appeal, and such appeal is not withdrawn), and, upon such review, it shall be lawful for him to open and rehear the case wholly or in part, and to take fresh evidence, and to reverse, vary or con.firm his previous judgment or decision.
This matter was dismissed on the basis that the plaintiff had not complied with the pre-trial directions issued on 28th March, 2023 as there was nothing on the record indicating that he had. However, the plaintiff having demonstrated that he partially complied with the pre-trial directions by availing this court with copies of the bundles of pleadings and documents filed on 12th May, 2023, I
find that his partial compliance is sufficient reason to review my decision of
29th June, 2023, so that this matter may be determined on its merits. I
accordingly set aside my order of 29th June, 2023. A varied order for directions on the time within which the witness statements should be filed will ensue.
The costs of this application are in the cause.
Leave to appeal is granted.
:
~
~~
~
;o'~ AY
%Z~A~M;B;I,A;~ -%--
Dated at Lusaka this .. 2024
-♦-~. ~ A
J
~
J
..BOXtiO~ SAKA
.H Cfi16batibuka
HIGH COURT JUDGE
R3
(
zoi .. ./HP 1.l~.&
REPUBLIC OF ZAMBIA
IN THE IDGH COURT FOR ZAMBIA
HOLDEN AT LUSAKA
(CIVIL JURISDICTION)
And
- ............................ \~ ...? - 0. ~ ~ ................
.':1.\ ½ .......- ~ .... Defendant/Respondent
And
............................................................................................................. Co-Respondent
NOTICE OF HEARING ~ "\
TAKE NOTICE that the above cause will be held and determyied by tf\e High Comt of
. (Jc... " (. . ~ \"" .
Zambia at Lusaka on the .................... D ............. day of ................. :--.\ ............... 202 .. .a t
.......................O ?S~.\\ .. ............
~ hours in the .......................~ .s;._···········noon Before
Hon. Lady Justice R. Chibbabbuka .
.' ·•,.
Plaintiff Advocates, kindly serve process and show proof of service.
Similar Cases
Gabbs Mukuwa Sichibbalo (Suing in his capcity as administrator of the esate of the late Moses Mudenda Sichibbalo) v Kelvin Kaunda (2023/HPC/0104) (29 September 2025)
– ZambiaLII
[2025] ZMHC 77High Court of Zambia83% similar
Kumamwa Moliya (suing as Headwoman Mwachinondo) and Ors v Marvin Mbaimbi Mohamed and Ors (2023/HP/1801) (4 November 2024)
– ZambiaLII
[2024] ZMHC 193High Court of Zambia81% similar
Davie Siulapwa (Suing as Donee of the special power of Attorney By Soteli Chisupa) v Wesley Chilubanama (2022/HP/1092) (14 March 2024)
– ZambiaLII
[2024] ZMHC 252High Court of Zambia81% similar
Brian Mundubile and Ors v Miles Sampa (2024/HP/0993) (25 July 2024)
– ZambiaLII
[2024] ZMHC 134High Court of Zambia81% similar
Chen Caiping v Solomon Chemicals Enterprises Limited and Solomon Ng'ambi (2024/HP/0030) (22 February 2024)
– ZambiaLII
[2024] ZMHC 70High Court of Zambia80% similar