africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2025] ZAGPJHC 58South Africa

JL Unique Solutions (Pty) Ltd and Another v E Media Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (2024/150153) [2025] ZAGPJHC 58 (28 January 2025)

High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
28 January 2025
WRIGHT J, MD J, LawCite J, Wright J, Adv J, launching

Judgment

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAGPJHC 58 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## JL Unique Solutions (Pty) Ltd and Another v E Media Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (2024/150153) [2025] ZAGPJHC 58 (28 January 2025) JL Unique Solutions (Pty) Ltd and Another v E Media Investments (Pty) Ltd and Others (2024/150153) [2025] ZAGPJHC 58 (28 January 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2025_58.html sino date 28 January 2025 ###### IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 2024/150153 1. Reportable:  No 2. Of interest to other judges: No 3. Revised 28 January 2025 WRIGHT J JL UNIQUE SOLUTIONS (PTY) LTD                                First Applicant (Registration Number: 2022/387458/07) TYRONE CHETTY                                                             Second Applicant (Identity Number: 8[…]) and E MEDIA INVESTMENTS (PTY) LTD First Respondent DEVI SANKAREE-GOVENDER                                        Second Respondent THE HAWKS Third Respondent THE INDEPENDENT POLICE INVESTIGATION Fourth Respondent DIRECTORATE (IPID) AGENT 9 - ALLEGED ETHICAL HACKER Fifth Respondent MRVW - ALLEGED ETHICAL HACKER Sixth Respondent GOOGLE SOUTH AFRICA (PTY) LTD Seventh Respondent GOOGLE INCORPORATED                                              Eighth Respondent YOUTUBE LLC                                                                   Ninth Respondent THE BROADCASTING COMPLAINTS                              Tenth Respondent COMMISSION OF SOUTH AFRICA (BCCSA) JUDGMENT WRIGHT J 1. The 1 st applicant company and the 2 nd applicant man who is the moving force behind the first applicant seek urgently, in effect,  an order that the 1 st and 2 nd respondents, EMedia and the Ms Sankaree -Govender remove certain allegations from all their social platforms. Related relief is sought. 2. The applicants say that they are defamed in the programme. They say that they assist persons who have been defrauded by scamming. They say that the programme aired defames them as it accuses them of being the scammers themselves. 3. The programme was first aired as long ago as 27 October 2024. The present application was served on 30 December 2024. 4. On 7 January 2025, the attorney for 1st and 2nd respondents wrote to the applicants’ attorney inviting the latter to withdraw the application as “ the horse had bolted” and that the applicants’ had waited over two months before launching the application. 5. On 8 January 2025, the applicants’ attorney had replied saying that the matter was urgent. 6. On 14 January 2025, the attorney for the 1 st and 2 nd applicants sent a fresh invitation to the applicants’ attorney along similar lines to the letter of 7 January 2025. 7. In my view, any urgency is self created. 8. Costs are sought on a punitive scale by some of the respondents and personally against the applicants’ attorney by 1 st and 2 nd respondents. ORDER 1. Struck off. 2. Costs reserved. - GC Wright Judge of the High Court Gauteng Division, Johannesburg HEARD                   : 28 January 2025 DELIVERED           : 28 January 2025 APPEARANCES     : Applicant               Adv MD John 083 457 7112 advkohn@gmail.com Instructed by         Judy Wilkins Attorneys 082 555 2283 judy@wilkinsattorneys.co.za 1 st & 2 nd Respondents Adv B Winks ben@benwinks.com Instructed by         Rosengarten & Feinberg – Daniel Baschkin 011 486 0242 danielb@rf-law.co.za Tenth Respondent Adv J Schoeman 082 336 4089 juan@rsabar.com Instructed by         Barnard Attorneys – A Lotter 083 324 9340 anneke@barnardinc.co.za sino noindex make_database footer start

Similar Cases

University of Johannesburg and Another v Toto Tshabalala Construction and Projects CC (52165/2021) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1081 (23 October 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 1081High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South African Reserve Bank v YWBN Mutual Bank (2025/059995) [2025] ZAGPJHC 518 (23 May 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 518High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South African Council for Architectural Profession v O'Reilly and Another (28641/2019) [2025] ZAGPJHC 559 (2 June 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 559High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South African Securitisation Programme (Rf) (Pty) Ltd v Hakem Group (Pty) Ltd and Another (2023/009594) [2025] ZAGPJHC 230 (6 March 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 230High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Communication Genetics (Pty) Ltd v Schonenberger and Another (025959/2025) [2025] ZAGPJHC 338 (2 April 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 338High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar

Discussion