Case Law[2025] ZAGPJHC 147South Africa
Anglo American Emea Shared Services (Pty) Ltd and Another v Limpop Propellers CC and Others (899/2020) [2025] ZAGPJHC 147 (17 February 2025)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
17 February 2025
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2025
>>
[2025] ZAGPJHC 147
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Anglo American Emea Shared Services (Pty) Ltd and Another v Limpop Propellers CC and Others (899/2020) [2025] ZAGPJHC 147 (17 February 2025)
Anglo American Emea Shared Services (Pty) Ltd and Another v Limpop Propellers CC and Others (899/2020) [2025] ZAGPJHC 147 (17 February 2025)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2025_147.html
sino date 17 February 2025
###### IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION,
JOHANNESBURG
CASE
NO:
899/2020
1.
Reportable: No
2. Of
interest to other judges: No
3.
Revised
17
February 2024
ANGLO AMERICAN EMEA
SHARED
SERVICES
(PTY) LTD
First Applicant
ANGLO
AMERICAN SERVICES (UK) LTD.
Second Applicant
And
LIMPOPO
PROPELLERS CC
Respondent
In Re:
ANGLO AMERICAN EMEA
SHARED
SERVICES
(PTY) LTD
First Plaintiff
ANGLO
AMERICAN SERVICES (UK) LTD
Second Plaintiff
And
POXX
ENTERPRISES (PTY) LTD
First Defendant
LIMPOPO
PROPELLERS CONSULTING CC
Second Defendant
JOSHUA
MACHUTE RAPOO
Third Defendant
PATRICK
TEBOGO RAPOO
Fourth Defendant
THAMMY
SEKGOBELA
Fifth Defendant
LE
-THA-NELLY KGWEBO A TIRO (PTY) LTD
Sixth Defendant
BAIPUSHI
CIVIL AND ELECTRICAL (PTY) LTD
Seventh Defendant
FIRST RAND BANK
LIMITED
T/A
FIRST NATIONAL BANK
Eighth Defendant
ABSA
BANK LIMITED
Ninth Defendant
JUDGMENT
WRIGHT J
1.
The applicant companies
instituted action against a number of defendants.
2.
The second defendant,
now the present respondent, Limpopo, filed a plea. Later the
applicants’ attorneys sought discovery
by the respondent. Such
was not forthcoming and on 20 February 2024 this court ordered
discovery by the respondent within
five days. The order allowed the
applicants to approach the court for a striking out of the
respondent’s defence. Discovery
was not forthcoming.
3.
A striking out
application was launched on 6 March 2024. The applicants sought the
striking out of the defence and judgement for
the money amounts
claimed in the action.
4.
The striking out
application and the documents preceding it were all served timeously
on the respondent’s then attorneys.
These attorneys withdrew as
attorneys of record on 19 April 2024.
5.
On the day of the
hearing, 31 July 2024, Mr Makaepea, apparently the moving force
behind Limpopo, appeared personally. The judge
hearing the matter
postponed the application to afford the respondent an opportunity to
oppose the application.
6.
New attorneys came on
board for Limpopo and an answering affidavit was filed. It is
conceded in this affidavit that there was proper
service of all
documents hitherto. It is stated vaguely that Limpopo was let down by
its former attorneys.
7.
To date, there is still
no compliance with the order of 20 February 2024. The only inference
to be drawn is that Limpopo is not
serious about litigating as it
should.
8.
At the last minute, Ms
Malungani appeared for the respondent.
9.
She was briefed only
yesterday. The matter is not ready for hearing.
10.
Ms Malungani undertook
on behalf of her client that it would discover by 4pm on 27 February
2025.
ORDER
1.
The matter is removed.
2.
The second defendant is to pay the wasted
costs on scale C.
GC
Wright
Judge
of the High Court
Gauteng
Division, Johannesburg
HEARD
17 February 2025
DELIVERED:
17 February 2025
APPEARANCES:
Applicants
Adv Mark Smit
marksmit1900@gmail.com
082 330 1808
Instructed
by Cliffe Dekker
Hofmeyr
011 562 1148 / 072 037 0082
Corne.Lewis@cdhlegal.com
/
Nishan.Pillay@cdhlegal.com
Respondent
Adv T Malungani
Instructed
by CHAYYA ATTORNEYS
015 295 9626
arshad@chayyaattorneys.co.za
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Anglo Wealth Shariah (Pty) Ltd v IMS Call Solutions (Pty) Ltd and Others (003036-2024) [2024] ZAGPJHC 193 (28 February 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 193High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
South African Securitisation Programme (Rf) (Pty) Ltd v Hakem Group (Pty) Ltd and Another (2023/009594) [2025] ZAGPJHC 230 (6 March 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 230High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South African Reserve Bank v YWBN Mutual Bank (2025/059995) [2025] ZAGPJHC 518 (23 May 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 518High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South African Roadies Association v National Arts Councils of South Africa and Others (2023/076030) [2024] ZAGPJHC 936 (20 September 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 936High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South African Council for Architectural Profession v O'Reilly and Another (28641/2019) [2025] ZAGPJHC 559 (2 June 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 559High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar