Case Law[2025] ZAGPJHC 446South Africa
MC LEX Investments No 9 CC v Van Aswegen and Another (031223/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 446 (9 May 2025)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
9 May 2025
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2025
>>
[2025] ZAGPJHC 446
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## MC LEX Investments No 9 CC v Van Aswegen and Another (031223/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 446 (9 May 2025)
MC LEX Investments No 9 CC v Van Aswegen and Another (031223/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 446 (9 May 2025)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2025_446.html
sino date 9 May 2025
REPUBLIC
OF SOUTH AFRICA
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
Case
Number: 031223/2023
(1)
REPORTABLE: NO
(2)
OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
(3)
REVISED: YES
09
May 2025
In
the matter between:
MC LEX INVESTMENTS NO
9 CC
APPLICANT
and
SECUNDUS EUSEBIUS
SCRIBANTE
VAN
ASWEGEN
FIRST RESPONDENT
JAPIE VOSTER SC
N.O.
SECOND RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
TWALA, J
[1]
For the sake of convenience I propose to refer to the parties herein
as they were referred to in the main application.
Furthermore, this
Court directed that this case be determined on the papers without an
oral hearing, as provided for in the Gauteng
Division Consolidated
Directives; re Court Operations during the National State of Disaster
issued by the Judge President of this
Division on the 18
th
of September 2020.
[2]
The applicant brought this application for leave to appeal against
the whole of the judgment and order of this Court handed
down
electronically on 19 March 2025. The application is opposed by the
respondents.
[3]
At the outset, I would like to express my gratitude to counsel for
the parties for the concise heads of argument and submissions
made
therein which have been helpful in determining the issues in this
application.
[4]
It is a trite principle of our law that leave to appeal may only be
given where the Judge or Judges concerned are of the
opinion that the
appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success or where there is
some other compelling reason why the appeal
should be heard,
including conflicting judgments on the matter under consideration.
[1]
[5]
The grounds for the leave to appeal are succinctly stated in the
notice of application for leave to appeal and I do not
intend to
repeat them in this judgment.
[6]
I am satisfied that I have covered and considered all the issues
raised in the application for leave to appeal in my judgment.
I am
therefore not persuaded by the applicant that there are reasonable
prospects of success in this appeal. Put differently, I
am of the
view that there is no prospect that another Court would come to a
different conclusion in this case. Therefore, the application
for
leave to appeal the judgment falls to be dismissed.
[7]
In the result, the following order is made:
The
application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.
TWALA
M L
Judge
of the High Court of South Africa
Gauteng
Local Division, Johannesburg
Date
of Hearing:
Determined on the papers
Date
of Judgment:
09 May 2025
For
the Applicants:
Advocate LGF Putter SC
Instructed
by:
Beder-Friedland Inc
Tel: 082 603 9640
Email:
sb@bfinc.co.za
For
the First Respondent:
Advocate MP van der Merwe SC
Instructed
by:
Couzyn Hertzog & Horak
Tel: 012 460 5090
Email:
stefano@couzyn.co.za
Delivered:
This judgment and order was prepared and authored by the Judge
whose name is reflected and is handed down electronically by
circulation
to the Parties/their legal representatives by email and
by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on Case Lines.
The
date of the order is deemed to be the 09 May 2025.
[1]
See
section 17
(1)(a)(i) and (ii) of the
Superior Courts Act, 10 of
2013
.
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
S.L.M. v H.A.C (18281/2021) [2025] ZAGPJHC 687 (19 June 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 687High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
MC Carthy (Pty) Limited v Olinsky (41796/2020) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1164 (13 October 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1164High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
M.C.N and Others v D.N and Others (2023-049065) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1047 (10 October 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 1047High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
C.L.D.S. v F.S.D.S.S. (2024/092744) [2025] ZAGPJHC 726 (23 July 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 726High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
M.C D.C.R v A.P.W.R (2024/075727) [2025] ZAGPJHC 307 (19 March 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 307High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar