Case Law[2025] ZAGPJHC 729South Africa
Exxaro Coal Mpumalanga (Pty) Ltd v Absa Bank Limited (028000/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 729 (21 June 2025)
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2025
>>
[2025] ZAGPJHC 729
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Exxaro Coal Mpumalanga (Pty) Ltd v Absa Bank Limited (028000/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 729 (21 June 2025)
Exxaro Coal Mpumalanga (Pty) Ltd v Absa Bank Limited (028000/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 729 (21 June 2025)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2025_729.html
sino date 21 June 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH
AFRICA
GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION,
JOHANNESBURG
CASE NO
: 028000/2023
DATE
:
2025-07-21
DATE
21 July 2025
(1)
REPORTABLE: NO
(2)
OF INTREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
(3)
REVISED.
In
the matter between
EXXARO
COAL MPUMALANGA (PTY) LTD
Applicant
and
ABSA BANK
LIMITED
Respondent
JUDGMENT
EX TEMPORE
WILSON,
J
: The respondent, Absa Bank,
applies for leave to appeal against my decision of 27 May 2025, in
which I directed Absa Bank to make
payment on a demand guarantee to
the applicant, Exxaro Coal, in the sum of just over R22-million. The
demand on which I found that
this amount was due was made on 19 June
2020. It was the second of two demands, the first of which was
made on 10 June 2020.
In the court
a
quo
, Mr Am, who appeared for Absa Bank,
argued that those two demands were, in effect, one act of making
demand. They ought to be treated,
in other words, as one continuous
demand. In my judgment, and for the reasons given there, I
rejected that approach.
But for the fact
that another court, in a different context, accepted that approach, I
would have been of the view that this application
for leave to appeal
bears no prospects of success.
The sole basis on
which I am convinced there is a reasonable prospect of success on
appeal is that in an earlier iteration of this
case, His Lordship Mr
Justice Lamont, in dealing with the same facts, concluded that the
demand of 10 June 2020 and the demand
of 19 June 2020, constituted
one continuous act of making demand.
I am not convinced
by the reasons Justice Lamont gave for reaching that conclusion but I
am bound to respect the fact that Justice
Lamont reached it. It
seems to me therefore, that I must, as a consequence, accept that
there is a reasonable prospect that
another court might also reach
that conclusion, even though I think that it is incorrect.
If another court
reaches that conclusion and treats the demands 10 June 2020 and 19
June 2020 as one continuous act of making demand,
then Absa Bank will
succeed in resisting Exxaro’s claim for payment, since it
appropriately rejected the 10 June demand.
If there was one act of
making demand and not two separate demands, then the rejection that I
found was good was effective against
both demands.
It follows that,
purely on that factual issue, there is a reasonable prospect that
another court would reach a different conclusion
to the one I reached
in my judgment and that it would dismiss the application that I
allowed.
Accordingly, I am
constrained to grant leave to appeal. Since the point on which I have
found there are prospects of success is
a purely factual issue, I
shall grant leave to a Full Court of this division. By doing so
I in no way wish to limit the arguments
Absa may raise on appeal.
For
all those reasons I make the following order:
1.
The application for leave to appeal
succeeds.
2.
Absa Bank is granted to leave to appeal to
a Full Court of this division against my judgment and order of 27 May
2025.
3.
The costs of this application will be costs
in the appeal.
WILSON, J
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT
21 July 2025
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Exxaro Coal Mpumalanga (Pty) Ltd v ABSA Bank Limited (2023/028000) [2025] ZAGPJHC 499 (27 May 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 499High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
Exxaro Coal Mpumalanga (Pty) Ltd v ABSA Bank Ltd and Another (2023/028000) [2024] ZAGPJHC 540 (6 June 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 540High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
Ex Parte Jaco Nel Familie Trust (2024/109954) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1168 (19 November 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 1168High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South African Securitisation Programme (RF) Ltd v T.C Esterhuysen Primary School and Others (2024/076235) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1288 (4 December 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 1288High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South African Securitisation Programme (Rf) (Pty) Ltd v Hakem Group (Pty) Ltd and Another (2023/009594) [2025] ZAGPJHC 230 (6 March 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 230High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar