africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2025] ZAGPJHC 1103South Africa

Mathevula v Willow Crest Motors CC (131977/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1103 (27 October 2025)

High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
27 October 2025
OTHER J, WILSON J, Defendant J

Judgment

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAGPJHC 1103 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Mathevula v Willow Crest Motors CC (131977/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1103 (27 October 2025) Mathevula v Willow Crest Motors CC (131977/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1103 (27 October 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2025_1103.html sino date 27 October 2025 # IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA # GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO :  131977/2023 DATE :  2025-10-27 (1)  REPORTABLE: NO (2)  OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3)  REVISED DATE: 27 October 2025 In the matter between MUSHE MATHEVULA                                            Plaintiff and WILLOW CREST MOTORS CC                               Defendant JUDGMENT EX TEMPORE WILSON J : T he defendant took exception to a pleading filed by the plaintiff.  The plaintiff gave notice of his intention to amend in response to the exception. The defendant objected to the notice of intention to amend. The ordinary course in response to the objection would be to bring an application for leave to amend.  Instead of doing that, for reasons best known to himself, the plaintiff decided to bring an application to strike the exception out. There is no basis in law for such a manoeuvre, which seems to me to be aimed solely at avoiding what the plaintiff must accept is a meritorious exception.  The application is an abuse of process and will be dismissed. I accordingly make the following order: [1]     The application is dismissed. [2]     Each party will pay their own costs. WILSON J JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT 27 October 2025 sino noindex make_database footer start

Similar Cases

Matshikwe v Matshikwe and Others (2024/056253) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1124 (6 November 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 1124High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Mathebula v S (A235/16) [2025] ZAGPJHC 902 (29 August 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 902High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Mathebula v Firstrand Auto Receivables (RF) Ltd (22/12536) [2022] ZAGPJHC 800 (18 October 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 800High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Matshikiri v Road Accident Fund (2024/015364) [2026] ZAGPJHC 3 (5 January 2026)
[2026] ZAGPJHC 3High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Mathe v Hoya Lens South Africa (2024/055209) [2025] ZAGPJHC 891 (5 September 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 891High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar

Discussion