Case Law[2024] ZAGPJHC 739South Africa
ABSA Bank Limited v Howell and Others (16168/17) [2024] ZAGPJHC 739 (2 August 2024)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
2 August 2024
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2024
>>
[2024] ZAGPJHC 739
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## ABSA Bank Limited v Howell and Others (16168/17) [2024] ZAGPJHC 739 (2 August 2024)
ABSA Bank Limited v Howell and Others (16168/17) [2024] ZAGPJHC 739 (2 August 2024)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2024_739.html
sino date 2 August 2024
###### IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG LOCAL
DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
CASE
NO: 16168/17
1.
Reportable:
No
2.
Of interest to other judges: No
3.
Revised:
2
August 2024
In the matter between:
ABSA
BANK LIMITED
Applicant
and
HOWELL,
PHILLIP MARSHALL
First
Respondent
HOWELL,
NOELENE JANE
Second
Respondent
SHERIFF
OF THE HIGH COURT –
ROODERPOORT
NORTH
Third
Respondent
CITY
OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN
MUNICIPALITY
Forth
Respondent
JUDGMENT –
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
WRIGHT J
1.
Mr and Ms Howell, the 1
st
and 2
nd
respondents in the main application, seek leave to appeal my order of
3 June 2024.
2.
Absa then had sought and been granted a
reduction in the reserve price at which the Howell’s house
could be auctioned by the
sheriff in satisfaction of a judgment
granted some seven years ago.
3.
It bears mention that the Howells have
lived in the house in question for over seven years without paying
anything towards the bond.
They owe the municipality more than a
third of the value of the property in municipal charges. In the main
application they chose
to tell the court nothing about their
financial circumstances.
4.
The Howells have no reasonable prospect on
appeal and there is no compelling reason to grant leave. In my view,
party and party
costs on scale A suffice in this application.
ORDER
1.
The application is dismissed.
2.
Mr and Ms Howell are jointly and severally
to pay Absa’s costs.
GC
Wright
Judge
of the High Court
Gauteng
Division, Johannesburg
HEARD : 2
August
2024
DELIVERED : 2
August 2024
APPEARANCES:
Absa
Adv
M Msomi
082 229
4363
Instructed
by
Lowndes
Dlamini Attorneys
Mr
and Ms Howell
Adv
LL Makoko
Instructed
By
Att
Gary Segal
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
ABSA Bank Limited v Agro Tractor House Import and Export CC and Others (40476/2021) [2024] ZAGPJHC 474 (13 May 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 474High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
ABSA Bank Limited v Best Accounts and Tax Professionals (Pty) Ltd and Others (030535/2022) [2024] ZAGPJHC 640 (15 July 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 640High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
ABSA Bank Limited v Farber (2022/8449) [2024] ZAGPJHC 107 (8 February 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 107High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
ABSA Bank v Semiconductor Services Exports (009611/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 430 (30 April 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 430High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
ABSA Bank Limited v Mashaba and Another (2023/045953) [2025] ZAGPJHC 277 (13 March 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 277High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar