Samet v Socrati Footwear (Pty) Limited and Others (2024/091492) [2024] ZAGPJHC 910 (10 September 2024)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2024 >> [2024] ZAGPJHC 910 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Samet v Socrati Footwear (Pty) Limited and Others (2024/091492) [2024] ZAGPJHC 910 (10 September 2024) Samet v Socrati Footwear (Pty) Limited and Others (2024/091492) [2024] ZAGPJHC 910 (10 September 2024) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2024_910.html sino date 10 September 2024 ###### IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG CASE NO: 2024/091492 1. Reportable: 2. Of interest to other judges: 3. Revised: 10 September 2024 In the matter between: KARALI, SAMET Applicant and SOCRATI FOOTWEAR (PTY) LIMITED 1 st Respondent CARALLI LEATHER WORKS (PTY) LIMITED 2 nd Respondent COMPANIES AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY COMMISSION 3 rd Respondent JUDGMENT WRIGHT J 1. The applicant is a businessman who lives in Turkey. 2. He says that he is a director of the first and second respondent companies. 3. He seeks urgently an order that purported resolutions, taken to remove him as director be set aside. 4. The answering affidavit seems tacitly to admit that the resolutions were not preceded by proper notice. 5. The answering affidavit says that fresh notice has been given for a meeting to consider the removal of the applicants as director on 6 September 2024. 6. During argument Mr B Van Der Merwe, for the first and second respondents gave the undertaking referred to below in the order. 7. In these circumstances, and on the notice of motion as framed, the application cannot be urgent. ORDER 1. The first and second respondents, through their counsel Mr B Van Der Merwe give an undertaking that the first and second respondents have not and will not act pursuant to any resolution or purported resolution of 28 June 2024 affecting the status or rights of the applicant. 2. Removed, costs reserved. - GC Wright Judge of the High Court Gauteng Division, Johannesburg HEARD DELIVERED :10 September 2024 :10 September 2024 APPEARANCES: Applicant Adv R Pottas rp@jurist.co.za 074 332 6887 Instructed by Duff & Associates Inc andrew@duffattorneys.co.za ; hazel@duffattorneys.co.za jemuel@duffattorneys.co.za 011 463 7477 Respondent Att Mr Nardis Grove nardus@ngattorneys.co.za 082 444 9728 Instructed by Nardus Grove Attorneys nardus@ngattorneys.co.za 082 444 9728 sino noindex make_database footer start