africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2023] ZAGPJHC 448South Africa

Xolile v Road Accident Fund (6517/19) [2023] ZAGPJHC 448 (9 May 2023)

High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
9 May 2023
OTHER J, DEFAULT J, ZAGP J, Acting J

Judgment

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2023 >> [2023] ZAGPJHC 448 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Xolile v Road Accident Fund (6517/19) [2023] ZAGPJHC 448 (9 May 2023) Xolile v Road Accident Fund (6517/19) [2023] ZAGPJHC 448 (9 May 2023) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2023_448.html sino date 9 May 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG Case No:6517/19 NOT REPORTABLE NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES REVISED 25.04.23 In the matter between: KUMALO XOLILE Plaintiff and ROAD ACCIDENT FUND Defendant DEFAULT JUDGMENT NEUTRAL CITATION : Kumalo v RAF (Case No: 6517/19) [2023] ZAGP JHC 448 (9 May 2023) INTRODUCTION [1] This is an application for default judgment, pursuant to a delictual claim instituted by the plaintiff, Mr. Kumalo Xolile , against the defendant, the Road Accident Fund. [2] The matter proceeded on a default basis because the defendant’s defence was struck out on 8 October 2021, for its failure to comply with a compelling directive issued on 15 July 2021. [3] The matter was to proceed on both merits and quantum. I formed the view however, that the matter was not ripe to proceed on quantum and limited myself to the merits of the action. THE MERITS [4] The plaintiff resides in Etsolo in the Eastern Cape and has been so resident since birth. On or about 17 March 2017, at or near Lansdowne Road in Khayelitsha, the plaintiff was walking on the pavement. He was knocked over by a motor vehicle, which he didn’t see approaching. The vehicle left the driveable road area, skipped the pavement and collided with the plaintiff.  The driver of the unknown vehicle fled the scene of the accident. [5] After he was knocked over by the vehicle, the plaintiff’s friend, who accompanied him, called  an ambulance, which transported the plaintiff to the  Khayelitsha Hospital, where he was admitted. The plaintiff sustained numerous injuries in the accident, notably he lost the use of his right arm. [6] The evidence presented by the plaintiff was compelling and I have no hesitation in accepting the truthfulness thereof. [7] It is immediately apparent that the negligent driving of the driver of the unknown vehicle, as claimed by the plaintiff in his Particulars of Claim, was the sole cause of the accident. [8] In the result I make an order herein that the defendant shall be 100% liable for the plaintiff’s agreed or proven damages arising from the accident. ORDER 1. The defendant is 100% liable for the plaintiff’s agreed or proven damages arising from the accident. 2. The defendant is ordered to furnish the plaintiff with an Undertaking in terms of Section 17(4)(a) of the Road Accident Fund Act, 56 of 1996 , for the costs arising out of the injuries sustained by him in the motor vehicle collision of 17 March 2017, after such costs have been incurred and upon proof thereof . 3. The defendant is ordered to pay the plaintiff’s costs of suit on party-and-party scale. 4. The issue of quantum is postponed sine die . B. FORD Acting Judge of the High Court Gauteng Division of the High Court, Johannesburg Delivered: This judgment was prepared and authored by the Judge whose name is reflected on 09 May 2023 and is handed down electronically by circulation to the parties/their legal representatives by e mail and by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines.  The date for hand-down is deemed to be16h00 on 09 May 2023. Date of hearing: 25 January 2023 Date of judgment:   09 May 2023 Appearances: For the plaintiff: Adv. V.J. Chabane Instructed by: Mahlathi Dlamini Bhengu Inc For the defendant: No appearance sino noindex make_database footer start

Similar Cases

Xulu v Minister Of Police and Another (21/52147) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1030 (13 September 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1030High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Xulu v Road Accident Fund (072835/2024) [2025] ZAGPJHC 139 (23 January 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 139High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
X.E.G v G.E.R (2014/11362) [2023] ZAGPJHC 893 (10 August 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 893High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
X.J v S.P (2025/146896) [2025] ZAGPJHC 1062 (25 September 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 1062High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Ntuli v S (A22/2024) [2024] ZAGPJHC 916 (13 September 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 916High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar

Discussion