africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • All jurisdictions →

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2000] TZHC 195Tanzania

Justoni Mkisi vs Saimini Mwanyoka Super Star Bus Service (Civil Appeal No. 60 of 1998) [2000] TZHC 195 (30 August 2000)

High Court of Tanzania

Judgment

){EMA J. J. ·--- IN 'THE HIGH . COURT OF TANZANIA AT DAR ES SALAAM. CIVIL APPEAL NO. 60 OF 1998 -· JUSTONI MKISI ••• o o ••••• • APPLICANT VERSUS SAU-HNI MWANYOKA SUPER STAR BUS SERVICE ••• RESPONDEN'r. RULING. This is a preliminary objection by the respondents in this appeal to the effect that the appeal has been filed out of time. It is on record that following the judgement of the Resident Magistrate's Court dated 12/8/97, appellant applied for copy of judgement and decree on 13/8/97, on the day the notice was filed. The appellant lodgd his appeal ou 25/6/98. Mr. Byalushengo learned Advocate, who argued the preliminary objection exparte upon the default of appearance of the appellant, informed the court that the certified_copy of judgement was ready on 27/1/98 ancl the Decree thereto on 26/1/98,,. It took the appellant five months to lodge the appeal thereafter ar1d Mr. Byalushengo submits that tne appeal is llopelesely out of time Although the apvellant in his written cuu.'1te1; affidavit d.uted 9th AuguGt, 2000 has stated that the jud~~ment was supplied to him on 1"/6/1998, I agre~ with Mr. Byalushengo that th2 appellant if vigilant should have been seized with both the judgement and dcree shortly after ;hey were certified in January, 1998 • . Obvisiously appellant 1 .vas not diligent in presecutin13 his appeal.· Accorcliris-ly ' r sustain the pre:...iminary obj2ction and l find tho a;_,peo.l •to"· ha,;e been field out of_ tim• I therefore des 1 ,1iss it with costs., .S.JJhema JUDGE "'

Discussion