Mwajuma Mussa vs Kassim Hemed Magoga (PC Civil Appeal No. 33 of 197) [2000] TZHC 167 (16 June 2000)
Judgment
IHEMA J:
__ _. __ _
IN THE HIGH COURT OF Tt,NZ.iu\lIA
(DAH ES S!iLJV,M DLS'ITJ:;ICT RffiISTRY)
AT D/'J~ ES Sii.LA.1\M
-· ----~--,--. .. ___
Fe Civ'IL f.PPY:/:L NO. 33/97
( Oriniginating J':•rJ!il Temeke Dii=,trict Court Civil
Appeal 77/96 Original PRo Coun 273/95 Temeke )
HWI,rt.JM!, MUSS!t • 0 Q O O O O e O O O u O O O O O O c, - " t!- O O O 1,,1 0 0 0 o O · !IPPELL1ThlT
Versus
KASSIM: HE.MED. t1AGCGJ, 0 O U l> 0 Cl 0 ~ fl Cl applicationo
Obviously Yir .. M'oiro the .a.dvoca12 for ,c:'le respondent has resided the
prayer as it lucks any merit 8nd at best iF an attempt to delay the conduct
of the proceedingso I a.gre0 Nith Mr. Mb::.r0 that applicant by hi.s conduct fr,
himself to blome and thi.,/ court c.'.?n.."1ot condone such practice which (;1J!lOUnts
to an abuse of the process of the cou:rto
L-1 the circunste..nces the application for leave to appeal to the Court
of Appeal is struck out for le.ck of proFCecution with costs,
Ordered accordingly.
.,
....... ,
. S.IHIHA
JUffiE
16/6/2000
rm: eanaam&• 0 C O O U O O O O 0 0 0 0 RESPONDENT
RULING
On 28th December 1999 the applicant through the services of Mro Sengalt:-v
learned advocate was granted leave for extension of time to file his
application for leave to appeal to the Court of P,ppeal .•
Applicnnt was giver.. up to 7th Ja.n,wr;;r 2000 to do so Todate no applice·-·.
has been filed ?,+1ci · ,10 expl::dnntion !::.fac · .· :1 , to explain the delay Mr.
Jundu, learned acl.vocate holding the br.iF.i' of VII'., Set.igalawe prays that the
matter be adjourned to allow :i:•h·, Se:np.;r,i6·1ie to appear and explain the
inordinate del3y for not filing th