africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • All jurisdictions →

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2000] TZHC 145Tanzania

Mwajuma Mussa vs Kassim Hemed Magoga (PC Civil Appeal No. 33 of 1997) [2000] TZHC 145 (16 June 2000)

High Court of Tanzania

Judgment

. \ IN THE HIGH COURT OF T.A.NZPJUA (DJ\H ES. S/\I.,MJ/1 DLS'I'QICT !<ffiIS'mY) 1\T D/i.I~ RS SALAAM -- .... -·-~--....c.•__..,._ Fe CIVtL /.PPJ':f:L NO. 33/97 ( Oriniginating :f:•r;rn Terneke Dii:·trict Court Civil Appectl 77/96 Original PR. Cour1, .273/95 Temeke ) MW!JDMf, MUS.Sil • 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 O O u O O O O O o t, • u Co o O O U D O O O O · llPPELLANT Versus KASSIM HE.MED. MAGCG.'. Q o 1,1 0 0 :, 0 d O O • 0 C O O U O O O O :) Cl O 0 RESPONDENT RULING IHEMA J': On 28th December 1999 tho applicant through the services of Mr. Sen.gal,-· learned advocate was granted leave for extension of time to file his application for leave to appeal to the Court of !,ppeal.• ApplicCt!l t wa.s giver.. up to ?th J a11 1 1c>rr 2000 to do so.. Todate no applic?·--. has _been filed 1;..i:10. ,10 expl2..inntion lit-,:::: - ,· ::.. ,, .. · .. :·•'. to explc?,in the delay Mr,. Jundu, learned advocate holding the lJr.i<".i.' of Mr. Se!1galawc prays that the matter be adjourned to allow i-1--:·, Senp.;ai<;·:ie to appear and explain the inordinate delay for not filing the applicationo Obviously Jlfir .. M'oiro the .advocala for ,.::ie respondent has resfrted the prayer as it lacks any merit 8nd e..t best if' an at-tempt to delay the conduct of the proceedings. I a.g1'e::: with Mr. Mb:.r0 that applicant by hi.s conduct iF himself to blclme and thir-::· court c.'.?nnot condone such practice which G.mount.s to an abuGe of the process of the coUTto L-1 the circunste.nces the application for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeal is struck out for lack of pro,-ecution with costs, Ordered accordingly. S.IHEMA JUIGE _, 16/6/2DOO ram 2 7 rem ,n

Discussion