Khatibu K. Muro vs Gargo Freighting Services Ltd and Another (Civil Case No. 18 of 1998) [2000] TZHC 188 (29 April 2000)

crvr~ CAG3 NO. 18 OF 1998 -· ------------- Dubeshi, J. A preliio.::i.ry objections ba sen filed by the Jrd P.::i.rty in connection wi.tb the c::_q:·1 f':i.l-?J:: '-:iy the pl."linti:ff. These .::i.re tb.::i.t the plqinti:ff h,:,.::; :10 CA.p:.c·i.ty to sue, tlv=it the pl:dnt '\is defective for filure t~ Epscify ths court in which the '='t' 1· -:- ., s 1 ) e ·: •1 ·· 1 ,r .,' · 1 ·• t - •07, 1 -.L f "' - ·, 1 -,-,:-,-,., t. t.h e pl"" --i_· n + of.L.,:.e ....... d r.. i!> .( 'IJ .:... I, - .... l C ...... {.,. '-~ l:•···~ _,'I,. \ •• : ... / ~ ''l - - ~ ..... .{ V .1 - the provisios of 06 R 15(2}. CoLlC8l for the Jrd pA.rty Mr. Mse,;111 1 :-1, fil•ad l:"iio ,-/ritten subJ_ssi.o.1s .::i.s ordered _on 31/12/99. The pl::iintiff, th,-:!n rei-:,;:Gs0nb:,,J iT) l•r. Jvlsuy.::i., W-"IS to reply to tlm®se o·siect.cns ·by 1.4/1/2000 9 n::::: t},er-e:_f'ter Huling 1·1::is to be on notice, Tocl-"lte the counsel for the plqintiff h.::i.s not responde~ • to the o½jecticns rAised. The plqintiff; is -·- -r- ·-· .-1.. dece.::i.sed Aziz Kl1qlib, whom it 'is qll·3i:;ed 9 1:1et .:ts .::e.::,t:-.:. :1:,er, he ws- knocked by ~ motor vehicle owned y the 1st. eendant And eing driver on the m.::i.triql time by th2 2n( tefeodnt. r'. The pl::iinti.ff' -;qs require,::; to :ces::_::,ond to th( objacttons L: risd by the third prty especiqlly on sections 4 & 6 of in iew of tbis• this court is of the firm viet-1 th=-,t t;·_,e 1--::,1.::,::.G.tiff b,,s ccnceded to the objec.tions r1ise6. In the event 9 the cl_im ="s.::iinst the Jrd Pqrty is hereby diSFI l lowed "H,/ \·.Ji t".:} cos ts. JUDGE 29/1.,,/2000 DelivereJ before F, Nbuyq - Pl::i -ln tiff'/:?..ecpondet: t.