Ally vs Hamza Juma (PC Misc Civil Appeal No. 14 of 1996) [1999] TZHC 467 (20 December 1999)
Judgment
ij
JUDG11.ill::JT:
..... ,....,,. __ .,,,. ,,.,. .. ., - .. . - . •---
T.:.o a:)J.iella:.1·1;,
.... ··; if ·;,r,q •
. . • - . .,• . .LL;.:. "' u,.J.a, . :r.n
s.~)cJ.lnat
1
·;;-as oT.rertu.:r.noa., :.,.0:.100 cl-i.,J};,os;3cfJt:d.1.1;:; ~-.:,1 ·l;:,o land in dis::iu·to.
It irJ :J<;nin.st t.\at cl0cis:i.o:1 t~:...,t : .e in ~~o·.1 1Jc:C0::;:'1) ·i;:.:i.,:; cou:-i."i:i on "'-1'l)Oal •
r;1"· .• o ,. __ ·::-·,•v'·•-,. 1·,,.,, +;1.,,., i·e·"'o----,- t'·· 1 ,.,·oo"· ...... 0·1 ""eco··.··r, --·,-·,o"'
-1., -.. l,J,;i.... '~ V I.A.f":> LJ .J. .,L,;;; ,--·--1;;, .... -.1. \J • 1 . i...• •. ~· ..... l C.;, ~--· ·
It iD :i.11. ev.tQe:,.oe
P'.: • 2 .J.¥:IT.J.TLI
.~JJ:;J.:.l, F:. 3 I-IJLL!H J.ALIH; PJ.4 ) .. 'r. :a:ui.:d /4.LIZ[, iJ.:·.,J .:JIT.R ~:::U..;.~4:,_-; c::.1c.1.
:D "'• 5 ·:t(LlJl:' JUI.Ll...
"
2
Further to the foregoing it is in evidence that the Appellant devolor,ed
the lancl in question. It has been established in avidence tbat the
Appall ant built a house on it. It is the A.ppcllant
I
s case that ";he
decoasod had offered him the L.nd in dispute for his exclusive-. uoc.
It uou.1.d aJ.so appear from the Appellant's evidence that the.re t-ra.s
only one plot and not two as asserted by the Res1JO'nd.ent.
It is, however, ap]?arc:nt f'i"'Om the proceod:i.:,16 '3 in tb.is court ana.
both courts below that the :following matter is in clispute betwecm tho1n.
It uas tho Respondent ts case in the trial com--t, f'ii~st appellate oourt
a;.1d in this court as well, tliat tb.o .AJ?pellant 1ra.s not :i.ven the port5.on
of land that sprawls beyond tho rortion uhere )io ll.ou.'30 has been
1- ing that he
has aJ.l aJ.ons -maintained that tl.1..e A:p:pGllant had sued a wrong person
succinctly, this is where the ~ies are at issue.
The f'irst a1)pellate com--t did not rule on th.0 question as ·t:;o
wl1otllor or not the appellant had sood a wronc l"X3r'"JOi"le I think for
ease of' reference and" in order i;o· appreciate. fully, I f'ind it pertinent
to ro1n.'OdU.Cc what the triaJ. ;na3:i.strate saida-
"Tiof'oro I give decision on this point, I hav0 to point out
that tho ::.."Ospondent had option to go to court a.:1d sue the A,ppella..'l'lt.
Th:Li:: is a rule of' private property that you can not tell a person how.
to sue and whom to sue for his right. The aJ?1?01lro1t had no option
to ~'O to court once he was sued. Once ho was taken to court he couJ.d
not sey
11
wl1Jr me. In this ca.se, tho Appellant hacl {;Ono to court.
i'Tell and good." It is on the basis of tho :fore
0"0inc;
tllat i a)Il unable
to aC;Too with both learned counsel Messrs 11:ramba and :Jangaue, for tho
a:vl)Ollant and respondent respectively, that the learned Resident
Ha0 :lsti--ato (in tho f'irst aJ:>Iiellato court) had llelcl tl.1at he had lTrOns].y
ouod t.:1.e Respondent, nam.ely II.AI.:.iSiJJ J1J1VIA.. I can not, th.ere:fore, in
tb.o abs0nce o:c su£f'ioient ma.tei---j.aJ., as is aPl'-''1.:ront :from the e.xce:r]?t
of tllo judgment, rule this waiy or that way on· the c;i:-ound of appeal
oo raised. that
11
tho learned Resident Magistrate misdirected himself'
in lau a,':ld on tl1e facts in holding that the AJ_)pella.nt had wrongly sued
the Respondent Hassan Juma.
• .... /3• i"'"'.C occ:1 built on. It is tho Respondent's case that tbe remaining
portion belong-a to DH.2. It is on the basis of' tce :fore
' ' ii __ ,..,.. ... •
3
I now turn to g:rouncls 2, 3 a....-1d 4 of the Petition of a.pPeal
miaa11ti tled memorandum of appeal.. These grotu.'ld$ o:cy-stalises do1m to
one GTOund, namely whether or not there ,ran ~ evidence to suppbrt
or justify the court's decision to dis:possess th.e A- 1 :rpellant of the
land in dispute. This being the second aprellate court, unlike tha
first appellate court, it can only reverse the findings of factfi of
the :n.rs'li appellate cour-h if it llad misclirectecl i tsalf on the evidence,
as is the case in the instant al)l)eal. Having oarei'ully and ve:cy sobber~
eone through the evidence :recorded in the co"UJ:"1:; oi" first instanoe, I ean
ve:cy- com:eorrta.bl.y and comprehensively sey- that DU',. 2 did not at aJ.l 'VO
olaim on the suit plot. :Both Ptr o 2 a;nd p·:r • 3 had in their evidence
rrhioh was not seriously controverted. supported the Ar>pellant's
01morship'f:t claim over the disputed pa.reel of' lnnd.. MJ rightly
c b:,..;:;:;", ul by Mr. lba P:r. 2 is on record, to have
observed qr l:h". Mra.mba, as is evident from page 4 of' the typed prooeedi.ngs,
Pt·T. 2 is on record, to have said when unswering a question that was 111.1t
to him ey the trial magistrate and I reproduce verbation what he said.I-
"]heo lote a.l.ikabid.lliwa yeye, eneo linalO[>'Ombaniwa nd.ilo
alilokabidhiwa },ldai.
11
There is a1so the evidence in chief of ro. 3 at l)a.ra.graph 4 of
l)a.(,'0 4 of the -cyped. proceed.i.n&s which runs as l'ollous 1-
11 ••• hapo a1imzunt:,·usha. cneo lote niki~ nirneona,
a.k:i.mkabidhi ha.di leo hii na};)al{.ana. na, lial<lZa (Mda.i ). tt
Sao• In cross-e:ll:al!lina:t.ion he answered as f'ollous :-
":Bheo a1iloka.bialliwa Udai ndilo lililoii.1.c;iliwa. Ila JRda.iua..
11
In nv considered view-, when the evidence of' ET.2 and PJ.3 •is
Gni.1.Side:red with the evidence of the ResJX)ndent hinself' who has in faot:
admitted that the appellw.1.t wiis :i.n occupation of th.e_ land in dis1JUte.
He, h.o.-rever, accuses the AJ?pollant as bcins a t:ros:passer. I am
f'ortified in this view ~J tll.e Respondent's assertion at Page 7 of
the typed proceeding"S whero in answering a question put to him by
the second assessor is on :record to have said the follow:i.nga"'."'
11
.. • .ilikuwa anai tumia tu s:iyo yake.
11
••• /4
4
w.:{7 :1. t .:,.:::.s taken 1r0ll oveJ.~ -'G' i..1-.-fi:7-:--i:i..:no ,:;ces.rs ·ho o: ,.o..l.loi1.1se :ds uso
a::1D. oco:x.}a ti 0,1 of t: .. e la.:.,.Ll J..,1 ::1..:i.u::>lxte.
t:.::.r:· :u.,.10 y-32,:;:-n bel'oro t:;,o:,.r v01:;~ UD0s.
=:::,-:.. KiJ1Cf::G.J: CJ-902) T.L.:a.. no 302)
.......... -4~•. _,. ... -4 ., .......... --, .....
no,r iJT i;'. .. ,eii- JJ,ailt.lOl a;;:::., :,;roicl :lncltil. ·-•o.., 0:11,,.tAk-.~ i ... ·= - .,... ..: l, ·.J."'ee1 ·' ·1,., ___... V _ V ¥•~ _, __ .,. : . .J .. 'J/ I~ ,:. - .j•/ Qtl' 0 ,1,:,t..;,, ., __ ....;_J..,J,. J,,,,,,I ..J.. -••~ ' ..,,J.J. ,}.-i:,i:: j_:,_ l'-_;:,:.::LtlerJs l:l ti ,r;.:i.0:1
t. : . ..::,::, :i.:.-·J., +·.: •. ,·.10 ,·,,:, e..-t;·i,1 ___ .,,' :-.:.·, ,1 ,·, o•