Case Law[2023] ZAGPJHC 584South Africa
Potgieter v Head of Correctional Centre Modderbee and Others (2023-049795) [2023] ZAGPJHC 584 (26 May 2023)
Headnotes
at Modderbee prison awaiting sentence. He seeks an
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2023
>>
[2023] ZAGPJHC 584
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Potgieter v Head of Correctional Centre Modderbee and Others (2023-049795) [2023] ZAGPJHC 584 (26 May 2023)
Potgieter v Head of Correctional Centre Modderbee and Others (2023-049795) [2023] ZAGPJHC 584 (26 May 2023)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2023_584.html
sino date 26 May 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF
SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG DIVISION,
JOHANNESBURG
CASE
NO:
2023-049795
NOT REPORTABLE
NOT OF INTEREST TO
OTHER JUDGES
REVISED
26.05.23
In the matter between:
JOHANNES
CHRISTOFFEL POTGIETER
APPLICANT
and
THE
HEAD OF CORRECTIONAL CENTRE MODDERBEE
1
ST
RESPONDENT
THE
NATIONAL COMMISIONER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
2
ND
RESPONDENT
THE
ACTING DEPUTY REGIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
GAUTENG
3RD
RESPONDENT
THE
MINISTER OF JUSTICE AND CORRECTIONAL SERVICES
4TH
RESPONDENT
Neutral Citation
:
Johannes
Christoffel Potgieter v The Head of Correctional Centre Modderbee &
3 Others
(Case
No: 049795/2023) [2023] ZAGPJHC 584 (26 May 2023)
JUDGMENT
WRIGHT J
1.
The
applicant is a man who was convicted of fraud on 10 May 2023. He is
held at Modderbee prison awaiting sentence. He seeks an
order that he
be allowed compassionate leave, under section 44 of the Correctional
Services Act, to attend his daughter’s
wedding tomorrow,
Saturday 27 May 2023.
2.
At
the trial, the applicant was legally represented. In the present
application, the applicant is represented by the same attorney.
3.
The
application was launched yesterday, 25 May 2023, some 15 days after
conviction and the refusal of bail pending sentence. The
respondents
are presently legally represented but have not been given a fair
chance to file answering papers. The NPA has not been
cited as a
party as it should have been.
4.
He
says that he attended at court for his trial on some 30 occasions
prior to conviction and that he is not a flight risk.
5.
He
says that bail was revoked on conviction. It appears that a bail
application, brought after conviction, on 10 May 2023, was refused
on
that day. He says that the present case is neither a bail application
nor a bail appeal.
6.
He
says that section 44 should be read to include prisoners awaiting
sentence. The section seems expressly applicable only to sentenced
offenders, but I do not decide the point.
7.
The
founding affidavit is silent on details regarding the conviction.
From the bar, the attorney for the applicant said that it
was one
count, involving between R700 000 to R800 000, one
corporate victim and not from a position of trust. The statement
was
made from the bar that the applicant is a first offender.
8.
I
do not decide either the question of urgency or that of the merits.
9.
The
non-joinder of the NPA is a serious fault in the application. The
applicant’s attorney admitted from the bar that he has
the
relevant prosecutor’s email address. The application was not
even emailed to the prosecutor dealing with the matter.
10.
Adv
Chabane, for the respondents asked me to dismiss the application on
the ground of non-joinder but in the rushed circumstances
it is in my
view, preferable to remove the matter from the roll on the ground of
non-joinder.
ORDER
1.
The
matter is removed from the roll for lack of joinder of the NPA.
2.
The
applicant is to pay the respondents’ costs.
GC Wright
Judge of the High
Court
Gauteng Division,
Johannesburg
HEARD
: 26 May 2023
DELIVERED
: 26 May 2023
APPEARANCES
:
APPLICANT
Mr
L Nolte
Instructed
by
Nolte
Inc Attorneys
011 788
0188
nakka@couzyns.co.za
;
steff2@nolteinc.co.za
;
lourens@nolteinc.co.za
RESPONDENTS
Adv
VJ Chabane
Instructed
by
State
Attorney
Mmapula.makghamatha@dcs.gov.za
;
thembi.gwamanda@dcs.gov.za
;
luckyboy.mathiba@dcs.gov.za
;
CPrhiri@justice.gov.za
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Potpale Investment (RF) (Pty) Ltd v Mbulawa (45011/2021) [2023] ZAGPJHC 520 (19 May 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 520High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Potpale Investments v Mokonyana (30374/2020) [2023] ZAGPJHC 881 (16 May 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 881High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Potpale Investments (Pty) Ltd v Kotelo (2023/070442) [2025] ZAGPJHC 473 (16 May 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 473High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Potpale Investments (Rf) (Pty) Ltd v Leteane (2025/047232; 2025/048371; 2025/048374; 2025/048376) [2025] ZAGPJHC 682; 2026 (1) SA 247 (GJ) (30 June 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 682High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
Maphatsoe and Others v Erasmus and Others (2021/18447) [2023] ZAGPJHC 214 (9 March 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 214High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar