Edson Kitwika vs Republic (Criminal Appeal No. 8 of 1996) [1999] TZHC 451 (3 September 1999)
Judgment
._
IN THE HIGH COURT. OF T;,,\NZANIA
. ,
,',,
AT MBEY'.A · .
.t&PPELLA,TE JURISI>ICTIOij
. (MBED REGISTRY)
CRIMINAL .APPEAL No'. --a OF 1996
' .
( ORIGINtL CRil!ITNiaL TRAFFIC C.ASE No., OF 1995
OF THE DISTR!CT·COURT OF RUNGWE, DISTRICT AT
TUKUYU)' , , ·
..
EDSON KIT WIK,\ •••••••••••••.••••••• o •• '• •• APPELLANT
. .VERSUS
THE REPUBLIC.·.=.· .......... · •••• · ••• / •.••••••• RESPONDENT
, JUDGEIVlENT
mwr:POPO J. - .. :- ,__ ,.,. __ ,....
• ~ • J
T.:.iJs appell3nt Edson Ki twika pleadorl ... gu:Llty to the offence of
I • ~ • I' ., • • '" I ' .... • ... .., • .. ,
rcffi '.'.:; yrescri.bcd· "1.mdor ss6 40, 63('2)'(,b)_, and 27(1). (a) of tho .:·::::·:
TraffL; .... ict of 1973. Under these i,ections the punisl:u.nent
p_resc:cibcd is nn·.imprisonment of l ycnr :.:.1inimum upto 3 years·
...
max.imu.-::.:- .imprisonment or a fine of. hs.10,000/= minimum or
shs.30,000/= maximum.
Tho learne'd.Ivlr. 11bise .Advocate for the appellant .has=
: contended ·that sine the fncts given were in Kiswahili the words
. ., . .
~
,.• .. covering. tho dangerous driving .. through .high spe.e-premmAblv -
that
"Uende:.h8 ji gari · ~ hatari" could have moan} the driving was
dangerous, recklesf3 or 11egligent.
Tl· i1J.tendod eh1:1rge for the appellr:rit to face· W'3S under
s0 ct. . on 40 .~ of , the Troff i c .l f!-t which is one of dange ro~~ n 7'
1
. ,....; -,..
.. . .·.
ar.. ho facts given in the manner he was dri "?'ing his motor ·:;,b5. 010
bus at high .speed in a town ·area of Kiwir mi?or settlement in
wb.ich ho knocked a pedestrian police officer also supported tbr,
...
• ••• /2
2 ,. . - ~ . . .
-
- • • - • ' ' • 1 ~ • "
particulcrs of ·::>ffe.noo nnd the ·stt\tGui.eilt of off
ncQ., I thoro:forc. don't soc acy grounds f'.or ro:ii"sirig the· convi(}tiilon for driving dangerously under s. · 46° of t~· Treffi6 :'jiOt· si.ncehe plea of . •. "::') /" guilty wns quite unequivocal. The arguments of the I learned.. .. • ''·· !, ' C. • I J, • . .., - ,. - ~ • J 1 , . , Tuir. Mbiso ll9-vocate of ~~ appellant that the appellant pleaded. } • ,o, I• > •; • •,• .... '•: j ) guilty vndor the motive .that. he .. W:)uld bo·:punished ,with a more fL . .. . I..· rathet:. th..-m an imprisonment term is not relevant to his ploa of . . • !' ~ t '4 l ' guilty bovause ot the time .of pleading BUilty the stance :Sf sentence hnd ·not yot boonso1} :.ac_hp.d and <he _was.. wrongly foreseeing ., . . ~ what tho c-::>Urt would do to him after conviction when he was not .. - ... ,.,. ",. . the 1:.1::-,cistrate himselfIt would be different if there was a as ,: lo. peuch/..oice. officer or P;,lice investigntor or official who · - · , - of theour)'c,:mvinceda guilm tply with __ an_ assur_nco trot: he vwuld get a light punishment. In toot si tua_tion his pa of V • ', guilty 1.mder th,Jse circumstance·s ·might-be taken to have ;been •. - ' I .,• • \ .·, . e qui vocLil• That was not the· case here where tho appellant on· . ·· ~ his own volition pleaded guilty. i63(2) ·(a) of the same ·Traffic ilct. _. This error is curable under socti·::in . .. .. "'· 388 0f tho C.P.A. which I hereby=ci,we for. i_t touc... • •·. .. . . ! r . . . -· . . . . The learned Mrs· Makuru, Senior State ll.ttorney• s urgup3nt that . ,._ ~ . . , - r . what was orronously stated in the statoncnt of offence .wos-:_tho · t ~ . ., .... ~ ➔,,.. • - ' citing of ·section 63('2)(b) ~ of' the Traffic /let inste·ad of· s;s .on the . . sorr+encc. pil4shablo rather. on';·the ingredients of the offence i tsclfI • 'j . . . . to be 4nc by this court should be to oltcr· the cl:l.arge iits
- • • - • ' ' • 1 ~ • "
particulcrs of ·::>ffe.noo nnd the ·stt\tGui.eilt of off
- •, statement of offence from one of causing death by dangerous driving . ·, ; ..• /3
~-
- -
under~ socti.:m ,4p to one of causing death by· carelese,' driving
· under so cti,Jn ? ~ of tl1P Traffic .Aet~ · That kind of alteration
" '•J ~ •
in tho charge she
t oc'ntt be dono by" ·the court for the· court•J·f causing ... : ~ ' , ::: ail .. ---tarl subeti tute thorni.n::>r offence. '··. ·.\ :· .. death 'boal.e:s driving under s •. 41 of Traffi~· .Aet.8ince . ' :. . .. ·.,.·,., the appellant h8 ct'lroady be.en ohargod with. a more serious • ! • I • ',' >• .- ·· otn_gcr.)us dr~;nd.rod offenoe/iausing deah by dng c/10 of • • ' • F the Traffic Actl ·Iri thi~ ~~~:t' -ose.f#li .subeiti tui.:>1?- ,. ... . . . .- ., . is··not worrolitod for t,ba appellnnt knocked dpade.a±;rian who . . . -~ l ,' . ,· was at tho rJ.iddle -d.f. tho road tbe:,e.fore · .q'UU;e vt.sible f·or the appG<l.1.ant,. -t.:iave seen him f¾pm_ a distnnc.o and break.ed in time .. , .-t._,{ "' .• or dono SOmG-thing. :t;.a.oi.,dking him • ..A.U..U j:neansis tt the .dri v.ing_ ~isgeJ'onsJ y a:1;; a .bisb, .spood.. aall.aged in tho l. • - : • . • ~ .' . ;· . sta.tomo.nt. of' Q£fenoe and as suppo-»te c1 by the .facts given by _t.ba ' . '· . tho 2 yoors impnmant is the m.inilllUlus -- always had to public outtry. After all, it is wr::mg to issue \ that heel he been ~onvicted for t,areless clriving and thereby cnusing he death would have attracted a lesser sontonco than 2 years imprison- / ment which is still lawfully within the range of a sentence of 1. - 3 yoars prescribed under section 41 and 63 (2) (b) of tho ••••• /4nd the trial court.• s ' . ', ., d.isoroti..m -in im.R,Osi.ng an imprisonment rothethan .a 'fine was .... quite justified. The dend deceased hnd a right to be alive now as the C:i.Jpellant is nnd the deceasod 1 s early termination of his ld.fe cnc1 employnent ns n polic.e officer nt tho·· persJnal whims of the nppellant is quite unacceptable in our c01l11llunity and h
.; : !., ,, .. I,,' 4
T:raffic Let.
/'
...
.i
i
I
... t·
!
'~
.,{
I
t
Cornf; !f;i{:··-iviwipto~ if-:•J.~ · ;,.,:·r . .LL' .:.·__: ,·'.!. ;:),''·. ' .·•r;·::. · _. ~
App,..,• "'.1; 0 n1t ;r.·ef:sq:n,J,. JE..::.sg:q, t ;For,
1
tPl?9 l}-t ~ ¥; l\lfbise
l.' -·"'··,-",.--- ..• ,. ~ ;i,. .,. •• -:, .t.::·.:,.Jt-: -- : ...... {:, ·- ..
C-:nirt.:
. .
",.,;•
. ,·
,.
- ab:;3en_t
.}
/..--••• .. :--~ ·,.,.. -' .; .. j'.' •·--: 1"·....,•-.;,,> I.•·•:::• .Attorney for.' the 'RO})Ub'iicf L i •.! ,t .•:._ .. :· .:,J ;;.: ~:,:., ·.:t',, sI_·- .. ~ <.ti ,~L, -.'!; i • . .. .. . c·-1 1 -·. - .,.. ,. r~:;~~;\ .. l'•
-•Jt ... ,.:{:a,: ,.,,...,:···.· \ ·'.( - "' q.eli vr4--.,.,JitJI;t ~-f: ilPI?.al, _e_xpained., } . ,... ..L .... .,.. . -c ·-~ . ., .. ,,.'.:.;.---1;.--:' .. ·I :.:- ... :... L ... .,.'. :i.:f;;.;.r·. :---; .:;.t ,: c > ·,·t": · ;} ; :;: r J ,., /) ',. __/------.., ~ r,. , - '. . -- I -~ , L,,;.: 1r; .. 1~f ~ _.1vt1tP0Po; ;• J / •,.,!. ,- . ,. , ..... ·, -·-.: ")- - .. , ... JUDGE 'I•,.,,,.' ... J . • -~ f' ;· . , , I ....... · J .. ' ' . -.J> ··.-:J., ·.._ i ,,,,:. . ,j . r ..