Juma Haji vs Julius Edmund (Taxation Cause No.1 2 of 1998) [1998] TZHC 2489 (28 August 1998)
Judgment
)
. ,---
i. ·:<'.":.,: .• :
..
IN TI-IE HIGH COURT OF TANA
AT. ARUSHA
TTICN CAUSE NO. 12 OF 1998
( c/f Misc;Ci;v.Appl. No. 23/98)
-JUMA HA.JI· • •••• • ••• • •• • •• • •· APPLICANT
. Versus
JULIUS :EDMUND
200:00. Orr item 1
shs 5. 000 :00 is clail_ned as legal fees and shs 4000 :00 as transport:
. - . ' . ,_ . . .
charges t.o see a lawy~. The applicant said that '.he· werit .to -see the
··t: , Rur,r·NG.
W
1
·N, B, JCAPAYA, TAXING OFFICER
This case arises .from Misc.Civ.application no. 2.3/98-<.wherein
Mr. Lundu, iearned_ Counsel who appeared for_ the respondent/applicant
. . .
filed an applicatiorl- under the provisions of section 14(1) of the
Law_ f Limitation· Act, 1971. That application was dismissed ·with ces.
The applicant then filed this cause.
There are twelve items amounting ·to shs 228-]. ., . .
lawyer by taxi. I· do not see the necessity for a· taxi.. This item ·is -
•... 7 . . . , .. ".. . "-
taJCed at shs 6.000 :00.
On i tel11 2 . the, claim is for 4. 400 :00 being transport; char~~ and
costs o:f sef't drink. _ "The applican:t, sa;id he went to see a r fr
purpses of preparing counter-affidavit. This· i'tem is taxed off as
· the charge -,rlates to what is include~. in item I. Likewise item 4 is
ta.x$d- off. The amount claimed · is 4. O_OC) :00 being transport charge for
going to see a lawyer for further c.nsuJ.tation. That -"'"tr:fp was not·
necessary,.
J
.••• /2
-- .....
:. .':
....
(.
2
..
. .
. Shs. 4.000:00 is cJ..aimed on.item 5.as transport char@s to crt
.for.filing notice of ed on each of the items,-resped.tively.
These are taxed as presented.
· The cause as a :whole is taxed· at shs 8;. 800 :00 ( eighty i'ive
thousand eight puhdred sh:illi..."1gs). ,
bjection. The record shows that the notice was
duJ.y filed •. Th amount is:ta.xe9- <?-s.presented.
On item 3 shs ·4-800:00 is claimed as transport charges t.o court
< '
and back and breakfast. The record shc:,ws that tbe case (Misc.Civ.
appl. 23 /98) was called on triat day and applicap.t was present. The
amount claimed for -,the purpose is n•t nnreas9Mble.
presented.
It is 'troced as
Item 6 which relates t,, a claim for court -attendance ie, taxed at
4.000:00. Shs. $.000:00 ·wa.s claimed inclusive of breakfast. Item 7
relates to a.ther court attendance for which shs. 4.IO0:00 is cl.aimed
. ,
., . - '
. as transport charges. ·· That amount is taxed as presented.
On item. 8 shs 150.·ooo :00 is claimed as· fees for· typing and dr ..
_·wing counte!'-'a.ffid.avit and notice of objection. The amOW1t is rather
. at .
on the high side and is taxed.L · shs. 50.ooo :OO. On item 9 shs.
40.000 :00 is chargE?d fox· drawing .bill of costs. Again the a.mount is
on the high side and it is taxe-9- at shs 10.000 :O0. The rest Qf the
. ::.•
items i.e. items 10, 11 and 12 reate to disbursement_s. Shsel•l'l.tOt
500:00 anl 1.500:00 is cl, '--:\ ...... ~ .. ,
.,,,..✓. '.
(w. N. Bo Xapaya)
TAXING OFFICER
28/8/9~ •
•
. , . . -
. Delivered in Court this 28th day of August, 1998 in the :rr.asei,,ce
of both parties.
WNBK/el.
\ i
\J_ ,....__ ) -~- ;,
(W., N. B. Kapaya) .
TAXING OFFICER
28/8/98