africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • All jurisdictions →

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[1998] TZHC 2241Tanzania

Nicodemus Iranghe vs Joseph Awe (Bill of Cost No. 25 of 1997) [1998] TZHC 2241 (21 August 1998)

High Court of Tanzania

Judgment

~ ~ tbctbtn Cl . '.",; IN THE m:GH. COURT OF TANZANIA . ' .... . ···.· :AI ARUSHA BIL~ OF CO§TS. NO, 25 ot··19<J;r:- ··· c/f .. Civil .Appeal Nb; 36 of'i99f NICODFJ1US IRANGHE •• • ••ee ·• • • APPLICANT( Versus· JOSEPH AWE. • • e •••••••• -' • e ••. RESPOODENT W, N, B, KAPAXA*TAXING OFFICER , ; , wfl In this cause there are i.3 ites am6untirig to shs. 622,450 ;00. , ·, "' Mr. De · Souza for the respoent. did. not seek to oppose the a.mounts on items 2 to 13 · i.nclusivelY · :Accbrdingly they e taxed as presented . .• ' ::, ; 'j· .. ··-. , ' • The only contentious item :ts·''item 1. Mr• Umbulla for the appl:hw · cant claims shs •. 600i<J00:00 6f,the gt'.Ound that PC Civ.app. no. 36/95 upon which this cause is pegged raised difficult points of iaw and . facts. What was invol,;.ed in that appeal appears to ~ comply summa. -·. ·. ' . . . .. . :: . . . .-· .. -, rised :in the last but· one paragraph of the jUd@Ilent of i;:l;le- court· whar-. . .- ... ,,· . '. ' in it is written. "Since ··the execution against the appellant was statute barred and in view of the fact th&t the appellant, was not a partf in the J.~ suit izl; question, the· a.pP,eal has merit and is accordingly allowed· with cott• This conclusion is pegged in. lar.g measure on e .tou,-pe.ge 1cng typed.. submission by Counsel for the applicant. It: is di4rro . .:t'.rofii· this submission that a substantial amount o! Useful research was made. Shs. 250.000 :00 wquld be commensurate witl+ the amoont. -Of ' . . ~ . ' the work done.

.. . . .. : ~ ;. t :, ,; t (I • ~ ~ • This cause is therefore truced at shs 272.450 :00 ( two hundred seventy two t}iousa.rid four hundred and fifty shillings). , ,,r. .. (_..A/' ·· (W. N. B. Kapa.ya) TAXING OFFICER 21/8/98 . . .-·,:< ;::,. :·. / : Delivered _in _cour~ this 21st day·,o/augustt 1998 in' the absnce of-. bmbulla for the ·applicant and in the presence• of Mr.De Souza

  • , r ;...W .', ! ,• I:: : ) .. ~ .. • . • or the respondnt~ _ '. _ ;· • ·. •; ',,t· .. ' I • AT ARUSHA 21/8/98. __ . 1.::., ,· . : .:,.,.>..;·_·,!. __ ., ; ' '' •:;\• .. ' .. -,' v"--~-7-: __ (W. N •. B. Kapaya) ,·. J • • • TAXING OFFIC.F,;tt . -. . ' . 21/8/98.

Discussion