Fatuma Habibu and Others vs Republic (Misc. Criminal Cause No. 48 of 1997) [1998] TZHC 2207 (7 August 1998)
Judgment
)
KAt,F.G.EYA ,,L
TN THE HIGH COURT OF. TANZANJA
AT .. DAR_ Court. On 3\10\9r, thi.s court {Mackanja;· J.}
summarily rejected the Appeal in the following.words,
''I.have perused the record of proceAdings toaether
-.
· with the copy· of the judgment.· I am sat.i.sf ied that
·, .
.·t'.J1P. r.1.ppeal ag.a.i.n$t. convict_:i:orr F,S SALAAM
MISC. CAUSE CRIMINAL NO. 48.dF 1997
(Original Criminal Appeal No. 71\97)
FATUMA HABIBU & OTHERS .........•... · .•.. APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC: ........................ : ....•. RESPONDENT
RU LIN .G
Fat.urna Habibu atJ<f·a Othfff5 (AppJ.icant.s) we.re c.:harged wiU1
Robbery with Violence c\s 285 and 286 o.f .the Pena 1 Code. While 2
'- ... \ of the accu::;eds were acqtJ_'i t ted Fatuma ahd '6 Others were
convicted. One of the accuseds's bejng aged 16 years succesfully
avoided going to prison and wa merely sentenced to 12 strokes of
corporal punishment '{h'ile ·Fatuma. and· the rest earned f o.r
. .
.
thems·eJves 30 ye1:1rs Imprisonment a.nd :1.2 strokes each.
Dissatisf iecJt with this lower Court
I
s judgement and sentence they
. ' '
appealed td thinJ se11tence .is devoi1
of any suf Li.c:i.ent ground of cpmplai nt .. Accordingly
the appeal i.s s_umma;-ily' r-:ijected
11
• ..,'
agg.r.i.eved by the Surrfmary reject.ion orde:t: aid not having
f j lP.:d Urn j r not ices of Appea] in ti.me l:hey have now come hef ore
tis·Court applying for leave to appeal out of time.
Each of the appliants filed a separate application but all
were consolidated - Mis. Cr: Applications Nos. 49\97, 50\97,
51\97, -2\97 were consol{dated.and have now been herd togethet
I
.
in Misc. Cr. Application No. 48\97.
1
·,,_
1.
.
I
,.
At: the head ng the AppJJcr-rnts informed the court: that
Godfrey Mwakalinga is dead hence his application was marked
"abated". The four,· other.$ reiterated what is ohtained in their
affidavits - that they were .late in receiving the summary
. . '
rejectjon order hence c6uld_nqt apeal in time. Mr. Mcaanga,
S\A, observd that he did have any objection lo the applications.
9onsidering the fatt that such summary rejection orders are
made in absence of Appelant, and, as_righty observed by Mr.:
Mcarangr:1; 8 \A, as the _system of comnnmica t:Jon b!3tweJ·n t:he courts
' .
and Prisons leaves a ·1ot to be desired, it. i most U.lrnly that:_
the Applicant'A explanation.is corract - that they wr notifiAd
of the order made on 3\10\97 on 7\11\97. Clearly therefore they
can'.~ be· held to blame for acting late. The applicatios are
accord'ingly allowed,
. .
t·
I
(Ji
~
rii
rnd as today is Friday and Monday is a
public holiday, time will start to run from Tuesday,. 11~\ 98.
(L. B. Kalegeya)
1
TUDGE
Deliverea in the presence of Applicants and Mr. Mcaranga, Stats
Attorney.
AT DAR ES SALAAM
7TH AUGUST. 1998
(r,. B. Klegeya)
J_UDG