africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2023] ZAGPJHC 715South Africa

T.M v W.K.M (2023-052942) [2023] ZAGPJHC 715 (15 June 2023)

High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
15 June 2023
OTHER J, MOORCROFT AJ, ACTING J, DIVISION J, OF J, Respondent J, Acting J, Loggerenberg J, me in the Urgent Court in Johannesburg on 14 June 2023. The

Judgment

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2023 >> [2023] ZAGPJHC 715 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## T.M v W.K.M (2023-052942) [2023] ZAGPJHC 715 (15 June 2023) T.M v W.K.M (2023-052942) [2023] ZAGPJHC 715 (15 June 2023) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2023_715.html sino date 15 June 2023 SAFLII Note: Certain personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been redacted from this document in compliance with the law and SAFLII Policy IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA, GAUTENG DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG 2023-052942 NOT REPORTABLE NOT OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES In the application by M, T First Applicant and W K M Respondent JUDGMENT MOORCROFT AJ: Order [1] In this matter I made the following order on 14 June 2023: 1. The application is removed from the roll and no order is made as to costs. [2] The reasons for the order follow below. Introduction [3] This matter came before me in the Urgent Court in Johannesburg on 14 June 2023. The applicant sought an order that the respondent be declared in contempt of court of an order in the regional court in Roodepoort granted on 4 May 2023. [4] The proper forum would be the court that made the order. [1] A High Court would hesitate to assume jurisdiction. [5] The application is based on the non-payment of maintenance and an alleged failure to add the applicant and the minor children as beneficiaries on the respondent’s medical scheme. [6] The evidence in the affidavits is sketchy but it is common cause [2] that numerous payments have been made. The papers do not reflect a clear and accurate accounting of debits and credits, and the respondent says in his affidavits that he makes payments as and when he receives money from the tenders he is involved in. [7] In respect of the medical scheme there appears to have been a lack of communication between the parties and their legal representatives as the Bonitas Medical Scheme had already on 24 May 2023 indicated that the applicant had been added as a beneficiary. The present status of the children on the Scheme is unclear but the respondent will in any event be liable for medical costs as the father of the children. [8] These facts relate not only to urgency but also to the question whether the respondent was mala fide. [9] I therefore decline to find that a proper case is made out for urgent relief under Rule 6(12) even if it were assumed that High Court should entertain the matter, a finding I do not make. Conclusion [10] For the reasons set out above I make the order in paragraph 1. J MOORCROFT ACTING JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION JOHANNESBURG Electronically submitted Delivered: This judgement was prepared and authored by the Acting Judge whose name is reflected and is handed down electronically by circulation to the Parties / their legal representatives by email and by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. The date of the judgment is deemed to be 15 June 2023 . COUNSEL FOR THE APPLICANTS: M P ZWANE INSTRUCTED BY: - COUNSEL FOR THE RESPONDENT: P M SUPING INSTRUCTED BY: P M SUPING ATTORNEYS DATE OF ARGUMENT: 14 JUNE 2023 DATE OF ORDER: 14 JUNE 2023 DATE OF JUDGMENT: 15 JUNE 2023 [1] Section 106 of the Magistrates’ Court Act, 32 of 1944. See: The Master v Van Wijk 1916 OPD 80 ; James v Lunden 1918 WLD 88 ; Komsane v Komsane 1962 (3) SA 103 (C) 104E–F; Dreyer v Wiebols 2013 (4) SA 498 (GSJ), DS v RM 2015 (3) SA 424 (WCC) 430C, and Van Loggerenberg Jones and Buckle: Civil Practice of the Magistrates' Courts in South Africa 10th Ed. (Vol I) 658. [2] See the bank account at CaseLines 013-1. sino noindex make_database footer start

Similar Cases

T.S v W.R.S (2023/010243) [2025] ZAGPJHC 971 (26 September 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 971High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
M.M v T.M (2023/012335) [2024] ZAGPJHC 835 (20 August 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 835High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
T.M v S (A124/2020) [2024] ZAGPJHC 513 (27 May 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 513High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
T.L.M v MEC for Health and Social Development, Gauteng Province (39328/2019) [2023] ZAGPJHC 442 (9 May 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 442High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
T.T.M v N.M (16305/2022) [2022] ZAGPJHC 324 (3 August 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 324High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar

Discussion