Peter Mwambene vs Republic (HC Criminal Appeal No. 175 of 1990) [1991] TZHC 2438 (25 September 1991)
Judgment
,
il')s
'{,(., ... ·-- .. _
IN THE HIGH CUURT OF TANZANIA.
· NC 1'.WtV 4_
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
(MBEYA REGIS'mY) ·
Mi.GR COURT 0Rl'?'1IN...;t.· APP~ .. NO. t 7:, ·:::: ·1 ;0
iUFJGJU.l• gm;111N~ fi.SE uo, ei OF ~ sis-o ':? .
'»HI PISiiid'- QOUi.
1
» OF. Mll"SY .. i. DIS'fRIC'J! :J.
MBEYi
. ,, -
iefjMP ~ r!i • D/ra.,_KEi'ae,i.:::.~~ t~;
Iii • • 0 •. • •
. . . . . , .
v·er~'-lS
- UPUIMIQ • ' l $ I I ; : s I : ; : ' ~ :
Fe
. .
·-- ;
..
'!
t, app, ,,oi-· '.ln.liwfull.y '1CQUired c/$_ ,t2(;,,.,,,, jU Jn, 'NI IOUI!- guil tr Qt boingfound i::l possession f PJ'Jltrjy '.ftlJIQtt4 '9 _pq ·.-a heM. Atol Codo•'aild ·was·4.'t,'1.oti was based 0n -t;.r.0 uncO?'l~JY;ltedentonocdrt tha o~~ - fOJ' tho J'GalOJI•- 3 years llnp.i1.01 .dool!.nvd. to supai a,11.t,1 VAO 111.~imwn pa."lltf proscribod by law. He is appGll,11, 1$~-i. ,.,· ·totioi) and .sentaroe, MS-• llti'Gt lo&rJtato 4-141 tb:;orμt
statement ~ ~ o;-.couscj, · As I shall. aan dnoonst:rate_ the leartied
Stato •tt;mo.v wa., fuliY justified to take tho s~~r.d c did,
thq OVidenoo ·rol:!..rd on by tho pro3cu-:ior. <-:!::: .. :- from thrco
wi tnesse!I· whpo ovJ.dc:,co was similar, ~t.ccording to .d.ndulilc
MwakY\lnda (PW1) on 8/2/90 at about 2.00 p.m. ho ·had found the first.
accused , . Isa Adam With anot· her person 'lhO absconded, selling 9 pairs
of second hand kha.ngas. Since it is not a oo mmon thing to see second
------ .. 2
hand khangas being sold, he quarried him as to how ho came by tho
clothes.
The first acQ.tsod and tho otnor 'person ab
1
c
0nd0
d leaving
tho clothes t the spot they were found.
':Chey were chased and apprehended.
1
rhc first a.ccused then m0ntioncd
the appellant and another person _as tho ones who h:td given him the
clothes, 'Xhat infot,na,tion lead to tho .:irre::,t of th:) 1ppolL:mt.
In his atitomont j,n court him by tho appellant as
a pledge for iJ. J.ta~ of 700 shs. ho had adva,'.lccd to him 3.nd that h" ,,__ e firs·t accused .:lt first dc:.Jicd
havirtg over knQWn tno appellant • In cross oDmination, however,
. •
. /
he statod that tho kngas had been given t, ·
resorted to selling ths olothos becauso tho appellant had. rlefaul ted
to pa,y the l, ~~ tQ ha.VO Said that the kha.ngas belonged to her husband
but n~ otfQrt wa.1 in.ado tr> ca.11 her as a wi tnoss in w~;.ich case her
st&temorrt wae llgf.'\r say ovjdonco which was inadmissi'b~ 'J,•
Tho ijn,
It she\l.ld lle\vo boon olaar to tho trial magi,'3trato that the
st.atemont ~ ~ ffcou.sed co,:.ld not be a.ctod upon to convict the
appullant unloee it W'QS oo.rrob0ratod, Corroboration in this case
could have 001110 trom the wifo of the appellant who w. ..... 3 rcportou 'uy
.c.otomQnt Qt th first acousod connecting the appollant with
the offonoo hav:t,ng not b0cn rrobotd, it would be unsafe to allm"'
the conv1c tion to e tand, T.ho conviction is accordingly ,qtt::!.shod und
aontonoa sot asido, Tho appellant shcul(i ·be sot froo at oncG unless
h is othqrwito o,allY detained in roepcot of some other mattar.
... . .. .
, dM~~-
f ;tt Mboya '1
~ '.." . . ~ ( {
\25~ Sotembr, 1991
. ' I. ·',I /
L• J:, ·a. CHU.A
JUDGE
Judgmont delivoro~· in
. . ., .
tho pros'3nco of Mr, Mbiso State Attorney for th0
. . - . .. ') •'
Republic-.'; <
1
':- •
. _:,,;;---,
:;;flt~ .
L• J-. R. CHUA
LJRG/,TM' lima
. JUDG3
25/9/91