Anyigulile s/o Kyom vs Johani s/o Mwambagi (PC Civil Appeal No. 33 of 1989) [1991] TZHC 2668 (16 August 1991)
Judgment
;. ..
. ·'
AT MBEYA .• .. · .. •·
i ... • • -
. . .
," (PC}. ·c1vn' .APPBA,L .No. 3J 0F,,.1989
. . ~ .
(From the decision of the Distri.,}t Court. of •
· · · .. .-Rungwe 'Dtstrtbt · t. Twcuyu in· Oi ,n· · A~~e i No;
. '' . . . . . ..
• ·_7 <>f ·1989 .2:'.iand· o •-'·Tukuyu Urban. Pr:;.mary. Court
Oi vi,f Case "No:·5/88 .... ·. .
'
'
,' B3fo l ·c~ B.- tumb,uln, , '.LVMsistrate 1.. . , .
... ANYlULIIE s/0 lCYOM01 i·s 11 ts t:·: st: I n·u1·,·,iAl'PB
Versua·
J OHAitr s/O MWAMBAGI 1·1 t S i St I I I I : : t t t ~ S St s URESPONDEN'J? .
. ·. ~ .
. - ....
ihis ia an. s,pl)eal from the deision of the l>istrict Court
. . .
Tukuyu in Civil Appeal-,No. 7/89. which upheld the d$oision of the
Primary Court Tukuyu .-.·"1 ·, dismissing the claim of the appe.l.l.all
which was compensation for 171 trees alleged to have been·
de strayed by the respondent;· In dismissing the appeal ''the
learned District Magietrate noted tat.the appellant had faile4
I
to adduce evidence to show that the trees he was olaimine, were
different from those he claimed. in Civil <rase No.87/87 of the
. .,,;
same Primary Court •
..__ _ ,,. Having peaed the recodfw of tht lower courts and heard
the submissions of the partiU I fj_nd the following mattaria
establlahedt
(l) In the ··yrimary Court the appellant did not
call any independent evidence to prove that
in fifing his
0
1v11 crase N:87/87 he had
failed to count 171 trees w~ich are now the
.,.
subject matter of this case;
C • 0 0 r,/ 2 ·,
-- . 2 -
. ·, \ \ •. '
{.)'.··fflieh the l.eerned l>i1iriot Ma~t-r-a'te?·decided to
visit the land .on .whfh the tree8 were sui,p<>sed
. .. . ~ Y'·, .
to be ----'· ·<;or the abo~
0
tatidirig the appellant could not pin point
the. tres which we~ supposed t<) f <>rm the
' -·;. ..... ·• . ·- . .
subject matter .of·.: ground,,.what was· the· a~tual. posi ti·on; ··
..• . ~- ;,,... . "·' ... • .. •• , :· t .,.·/-'
\ .. :'e ·new oase.
: oriiμnal sμi :t wi thou:ti' verifying
~~ the.· ,. ...
(3) It was·naive for the appellant to expect·the·oourta
to accept his word that he, hat \forgotten to include
• . .... 1- - • - ~ ~ • •,. : .•• - . ' •.
171 .tree.s in N-asons like· t· learne:4,Dtstrt~~ -~~stl'ata.-I
find ~~. eri t' i'n 'this .ap-i· ·:;re.sen~ of both 1>artiea:
LJRC/ATM' lima~
~ .... , ..
. Lt J. :R. CHUA
JUDGE
16/8/91d •' :. ' ·, JlmGE · .
' .. ,j!f)_· ' •c<• . 1 :
--rae,:wt. :t:t .. be 41;; d ·w1 th
. ~ --
, . . .\ .. - . . . . . · .. ·: ~ );:·: . .. ~ ···.. ':
costs-' . . ·, . ,,·; ..... : ·:;.
•,,·,,. ..,. '-·
, 'i... '•( \A,,.',-: ·.... . L.· :_ • • rnn-:,.
: .'!·-... ~ -- · VllUQ
At Mbeyt delivered in open .oo·s1n' ·