africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • All jurisdictions →

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[1991] TZHC 2740Tanzania

Peter s/o Athanas vs Republic (PC Ciminal Appeal No. 13 of 1988) [1991] TZHC 2740 (2 August 1991)

High Court of Tanzania

Judgment

J:.T_1)0!)01'i!. (:r>c) cn1J"IJ'T 1 t. /J'7"":fI, t~o .13 0"il 19Gt1 c:. :.r'Rdr.r rr. ij::crs:roN 0111 Tr. i)r3T'1ICT c01RT 01 WY"'.{dNI f.T r !:. 1-,..,rn:rr nr fY?:t:1' !IJ\T L t:.."P •1. 1m • 14 o,;, 1 9 M or:nn:r_J\T -t CHTKO! ;\ PJj::,'·I-?.Y COTr:!T C'1T1-:r:f.1T"i, C/-.1"::) '. o ... l"I I 1ro, 19 ow 1'):i91. p~ AT!I!Jil'N3 • l 1, • • •••••••••• ~ • " •••• ::.PP"l1'.Ll• ~11T V:B.3U'3 JU""1Gl''l"J!JT The appcllont Peter s/o .!'..thcnns ~s conv:i.ctcd of two_ offences by t!1c Chikolo Prinn-I'jr Oou:rt in Pr:p.yoni i)istrict. The first oount w-ns of hout.3cbr<:nkin0

c/o 294( 1) of Pcnsil Code Cnp. 16, whllc the scconcl ·offence was of sinp:i.c t~.1cft c/s· 265 of t).1.c Pcnnl Cork Cnp_.16. 'Jc: wns scntcnecd -to t!1rcc ye o.ro an1 si:x: mont'..lS inpriso1wcnt rcspc cti vcly, vr.:i.ich tcrn.'3 were or!1crd to r,m con01..,..rrcntly. 'Ic nn-"c ::,:i.s f:i.r:Jt n-ppcc:l to 110.nyoni :Oistriet Court, 1,ut ::iis nppc nl W2S d.ismissed an:! hence this second. ap!)enl. J.\ftcr pcrin 0 ,.c c:vi,1cncc on record. I nta sntinficn t:.rnt t1is o.ppeo.1 s bnnkrupt of mcri t. There ·was co,,c:11t cv:i.d.cncc r:t the tr5..:J. l't1ich incrir.iinntc t:.1c- cp:pcJ.lnt. 'li'irst t'..1Crc "t-ms t:.::.e cviricncc of thc- cyc-wit11css nr.nonifo.cc '!)c1nj_cl(P~-r,3) -w:.10 lrn:l sc::n t)lc n.ppcll::mt steal t!1c bn.-~ fron the complnincnt 1 s house in 1)roa~ a.cy li -.!1 t. Then sc oonclJ.;r, no G: rcGul t of the appellant •s confession, there w::is discovcrc1. the stolen bn.0

in the bus~ where t.'.,c· nppcllnnt hi:i-1 le} t)1c scnrc'..1 pr:ir1i.f • T:i.c ni)pcJ.lnnt ooul,l not ohnllc-n.::;c t'.1osc two pie o::s of evidence t11.:1t w::-.re presented nt t~:ir. trial. The evidence n..-;ninst t~.1c bppcllant wns indce-l. in1Kconbly wntcrti,-i!1t 2nd I nD surprisr:·l t~:ct '..ic hnc'c t1e ,".'Mts to nppc 21 to t!1io court. In the event t:io 2l)PC8l is dismsoc-'l in its entirety. or,kr a ocorr1 incly. · JTIDCf'E 2 •. '.1. 1991 COtrtT: Jur:l.,'7,i.Knt ,-'\elivcrc'l in c.!::cn 1 )crs t c,• · • t' -;,J.n.-:1r.c in :.1c presence of r•r. J\Tr:luri::;ul'u State /.ttorncy 1 1;u.t in t11c nbscncc of t:.-.c nJ?pcllnnt. __ ;,,. · \ ___,.,, ✓ l:>0. •,J--•-· . . --- ... •--, J. L • j'1Tf:J ;_S .' _i''l".[A J1T')T,

Discussion