africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • All jurisdictions →

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[1991] TZHC 2664Tanzania

Herman Kaaya vs Andrew Ayub (Civil Case No. 93 of 1989) [1991] TZHC 2664 (29 July 1991)

High Court of Tanzania

Judgment

· IN THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA . . AT ARUSHA cr'/I~ CASE NO~ 93 OF 1989 HERMAN KAAYA •.•••••• :PLAINTIFF '¾; \ WERSUS ' ;--: . . ANDREW AYUB · ·• l• ...... . DEFENDANT,· J- U DG MEN T .,·. \ ,.. ... ....... This is an ex-parte judgment against the defendant ne Andrew Ayub in respect of an amount of. Shs. 750 ,_ooo/ = which · was given by the plaintiff to the defendant by way of a loan. ' ' . ' The saiq.transa-ction was reduct"f(in. writing· and duly signed by both partie&:, and the ·sarXe as witneesed by Mr. Kinabo, . . ., • • , r learned advocate The loan ';Mas tq be repaid by three· equal instalments ,of Sh·§. r~,.O?fl~~ P?; ➔ i on 16/3/1989; 16/6/1989 and 16/9/1989 respep-eivly. The loan.was interest free. i- It was agreed that upon dfault ~f ~-payment as agreed the lender would sue he borrower for the recovery of the loan amount by summary suit.The borrower defaulted to pay the loan as agreed and hence this suit. ·,;,, The defendant was duly served but defaulted his appearance. 'He also never filed any application for leave to defend the suit. For that reason the pl&intiff applied to prove the claim ex- parte. He produced in Court the original of the loan agreement. The same was admitted in evidence after the same·was duly _stamped with stamp duty and . was marked Exhibit P1. On the strength of the saia loan agreement judgment is hereby entered against the defendant in the principl sum together with costs. As i,he plaintiff had waived interest on the loan, no.order for payment of interest is made. It is ordered accordingly; I? ~~ M. D. NCHALLA, JUDGE 22/7 /199.1

if . 2 29/7/1991 C.eram: M.D. Nchalle, J • . For Plaintiff: Present in person For Defd .. c!Dt..l Absent- ,·?C:parte C/C Eva Lyaro· ourt: Judgment delivered in open Court at Arusha in the of presenceLthe plaintiff this the .:29th 'day of July, 1991, MDN/mk ., --- •. , .. :, /': ,, . ~W-4 }1. ,. D • fteH1fLLA , JUDG.E , 29/7/1991

Discussion