africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • All jurisdictions →

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[1990] TZHC 316Tanzania

Paulo Peter Mbuya and Another vs Republic (HC Criminal Appeal No. 110 of 1990) [1990] TZHC 316 (16 November 1990)

High Court of Tanzania

Judgment

~ . " ~ ½$~~ ., . N THE HIGH COURT OF TANZANIA AT. AU§HA APP ELLhTE JUR1.S:0IC'.r.fON · . .. - .. HIGH coURT.·CRIMINAf, Ji.P'PEAL No iio OF 1,:3• i, . . . . • ;... • .... ;· • :.:. .• • • {O;iginal C_riminql ,Cas,e 1:,1o.· 529--6f 199 .of the Dst_rict .... :,·.:-' Court of Ah\sha District at ArUs'ha - · BEF0RE£ :A/'MgWENGA .Ef! q~, Res icl'ifu:~ ,:Mais :ti cite\ . . ' .. ;;•; · ' . , - . . . PAULO .PETER I"lB1f¥h &' ·AN<YrHER o •••••••••• • .. •·. 9 ••• ~ .-.A.PPELLJ.liTS :_ ( Original .. .Ac:.c:us ed) .. -. ·. . . . f,. . versus .·_, --- .. . •.A-•-·-·•-•--.-;:-----..,....-..,------------------- •'·· ·- :.• .... /.\ .. ,. 'JUDGMENT MROSO, Jo - .. -····•·--'-----... . ' . Du .. ing ·t·he· very· earry' hours of . . . . . i4th Novmb,er, .. .l-989 a. b-and: .. , ·;: ... . ,;, . - .. . •. ... r . . ~ . • . . robbers: :be5.et · the._w~·tchrnert of a Mr-• E~·iek Winberg, ·a s·wedish ii'at:icSnal, at his house at J.v1ringa Estate, Nga_rarnto,iJ. _.ai;:ea, in Arumeru. One .. . . r. ,lo .\ .r: . .., .. of the robbers was armed w'ith ·a ·gun. The wtcbmen. were • : • _,. • •• •• ,. • l,. • assa1.1l.:/:.ed nd ~ thereafter, :·:the robbers force9 ope the .door of · ·· ···. · • · .:. -·· · · · an · th .. house. ·. They entered and· s.tole from therein/asortment of · · !": .. · · .· . ' - household goods whch. included a TV sreen,. clQ.th.es ,. watches· and. a m:i-crowai.r~·'cookel;'~ · The'·-tot:a1 valq~- .f. t.11e stolen -goods was GS tn:c.,td. at );hilling 'io6, i~&/=. . J.y · dars":;: latr, :·_on . • : • • • 0 --:- • • • • • .: • =.. . •; . ! . : .:I' • • . : • •• , : 0 29/11/89;· some· of ·the stolen goods _were .. f'_ecovere~.- . .;fr9m a room occupicd,rby:· one· Danii :.Wil'liam ·Kpto. in .. _Coi;rdor - ar.ea • of . . : ..... 1. . i . . .... ArushiFHui'1id:pality~ •.; . •-;:, . . . iv; a· resul •i·of· 'polici?inve~ tlgatins sven peo_p.le were~ · . -i. :' ... arrested on suspic:iorr 'that they were tpe_ .f.pbFs_ a_119 were ..... • . ·-. : . · .• 'r-. . • . . . subs2qucntly prosecuted. These people included t.re . .appellant . : . .. . ·Paul P.::!ter Mbuya who was made the first acc.usep, ,ts tine ... ,:•- Mrisho ·IC:1.intoni as . the: i·c·od:· aci;;d; Daniel William Kam,ton'i as the .third·· ccused : th scond ·' appel~~t .tto .. @-- ¢.e..upe . Hussein Dao ',wh0 was th· •fifth :;~~~usd· · and $aiq: Scμum @. M.rangi ... : -: ......... · .. as the s cvcr-ttlf ·!accused o · .... ~ .. : ·: ~ > .', : ,.. '. ~ • _; • -·. :. • t Af'i::er h8cfrin.g tffe· ~vidence of twelve prq_SE::?C-Ution .. witn·esses · )' . . .. .' ~ ·.• .. ~ , .• and t...11.e: evidence· on oath-' of· the s·even accue P..rsns ,the.:·-· trii court' con~-lc·td ·the_··r1·k t' 'ap~e}ian't,. -~he .. se•~nd appellunt and the seventh accused person. The rast of.oo••••/2 :. . <- .:

... The rest of the accused persons:"wei:,-e-.acquitted •. ,. - ... --.............. ... . ... . Before I dls"bμss the· propriety or ,otherwise of the· . . . . ..... ··- .... ... .... . . . '.... . convictions of· ·the appellants I--wish. to comment, t?.rie;fly _o_n the second CC>Ul;t in the· ch:age sheet which conceinecf- the second : . ': · ... and third accused personso In the firs-t -count the second and third accused pers.?ns: weY.'.e charged a 1 ong with the rest of the accus.ed pers ans _ i th crnrni tting the robbery. In the econd .. ·:.c-,h.inf the :a'ecbnd·,i'id third a-c.'.lsed were chnr(jed ,with. redei in:; some" of th'.:.-.;6~~~~which were· .obtined • • • • . .- r• : • •• • . ; : ••: .•,:: I\ • ',: • • -,. ~ • \ th·c· robbery o --That- was an::kror - - !l'h-e--smne-aGcused persons durins; cannot and at except t:ji' : .. : . . . -·· .. ,. . . ·. bo char0ect,,?.i:l), f3J1-i:.Y.:g.oods iR---t:he-'.-c-oUr'se '"9.f a· robbe,;-y ,.,_: __ -: · • - the s amc. ti;;:· be. charged with_\ recivtg -tose ··s.:am.e ·:goods;: :, ·:-· as an. .ai--trnative ·count •. Thi =:~~~oril •,dont, therefor'.. • .. ought-:co have beti;?n ch_a-rged.,as alternative to' 't:he····firs·t ot,iht. · N.ow_ to the :~~p-eal- _ : - ,. - ·-· . "-- _ i -- - - . - - ·- . .. t;· ,'··,;·t .. .. . '\ ... f ... .- Of the twelve,prosecution wi.tnesses,.-six·-referred to the . . . . . . . . - . . . ··-; . :- first appcllant in. t:.heir evidence •. First;._.there was PWo3 ASPo Stanley. Eli;,'Jnte_o,'. ·:H~ s-id:. i ,;S:-.ev-id:ce t-~~ the third a9cued who hnd ben-: Qzid,iri.c~~~~---·~~~-~Ion··-of. s::-of .. t~:--~~~len . ' .. . . . . : ~ ! . goods -told him i_t ·was the firt_ appeilant who had taken the goods to. his .. houso _ Now, that was not trtle;.;, :-:'f.he second accused (who is n- bother. of. the. ;t_hird a(:Us·d) - ~~~- h-e seventh accused • • • • • • • • , • • : •' a •• • •. ; :::,1 ·. ~ . who WGt:C the- pers,ons_ who ac;:tually; _tobk the __ 9oodS --·to '-the house . .. . . . . '. - in which £1-1 _thid i:used ,lived nev_r. -afd they ,~~fre acdottipa·ied by· the fiist ''·ippil:rit:. ' d' ;Y.: case, 1 -c.dod:ing - to: th- aV:aiiabt . - . . :. -· -· evidence, tl1e third ccuse9 ___ ;-J_as no_t _ a,t,:home when ·the 'J°ods were brou(Jht in •.. So,, he_ .ould. no_ h_av .. 11_qn ,p_ers·oally who ·had· ) 't -' r,. ! .. ·. : . .·· . . ' . . . . . .i . . bro'w:_;ht =tl1os·s;ood,"-: - 1 :; , 1 ,,::; ,-,:'. ___ .·, -,·.. >· P.,W.,4 ... :,Nnd .Mohamid was ti!g_ ... y- pr9secu•t-ion witness·. . . . . . . ··- . . . . He W<-lS- a t.:i.xi d1d.ver 'and claimed that h~·had ben hird-"at · about ·6.30.,a.,,m., n ;4>{1/9 ,by th--v-.acbsa· o -ollect • . • .. .... . . ~ - .. ..... .: .• : : : . • • • . • .• ' • . . . . , . : 1 . : • • • • the stol.:m gooos- from. $.t... <;:ons.t:anine; ;cnool _ area and that he took them to· '1<irih ues- tj~~~e - i~ too- - ~~·said h~ had . ·4. . . found the.: fi_J;"St_ app1:llan_t _ at the plac:=e w}:lere_/he goods were and h8 (firpt c;tfpellc1nt) h_el_pep, to :~o-ad 'th9se 51oods intO th·e taxi. . . . . . . . ,.- . , .-. . ~ -· :_.·. '. ·. ·.•··• ·"· ·-· .. 1 .•• . : _. .' ~ ~~

·.:-,::-· He also travelled;:in: the taxi· to Kiriishe Guest House wher~ the goods were:;:off·"'-loaded and kJpt in a room nNmqer seveno ' . P,.W,.6 - Saidi Msaka'i was onefof· the attenq~nts .at:;Kiriche .·;:; ••• .J,-· • ., • • . 't" ,· • ' Guest H~μse. He said he saw the first appellar).1::, the second .. . . appell~•t; __ ?\nd the seventh accused persons -outside .. th:e. guest • • • ~ •.,:. • 1· - < I • ~ • •• hos~• , .. .μbsequently trie · two app,ellan~~ ;-tured to the. ,guest - : . • 1-- • .... ' ' :'..( ·,:,1 - ' ' ' hous.,.a~. asJced•!'for the seventh accu.sed,. per$on --:- .wh:9 w.s.,kr'i'on-_ 0 ·:': to be the occupant. of room ·number seve'n·.. P o.Wb::2 ~ .. Q.river;. Prota.rnu . . . . . . . . -··- .. . ! ·.; :.:_ ·. ·. n. . . - :.- ., . also tGt:,:f.i1.xLon s-eeirig the··second appellant at th:e gusst. · ' •:.' •... ' . ' ~ ',' . , . :' , . h<?WfG p-μm_ises·,:,:;:· __ :,,. '· · 1 · . ' . ; __ ! - . · ·P-.1.9 -:l:>e-t·active.Corporal Ffrrnine recorded aLcautioned-• . ; '. . .· ,! .. :-' .. l statcm<2nt from 'the f':i1'rst appellant.·· The statement was- adnlitted ·. into v.idenc·e as ·exhibit p .r, Jt'.£h·oh the first ap.pel_l;c1nt' had : . prott:;)tccl that he maae it .:!~~~· ti: ·as, beaten up by .,!:he: policl: • · ' "1 ~ • J . . In the state.m(mt' the· firs·t ·apJ?ellant sai4 iner a;lia that ltth0 . ·- :· .. seventh u.ccused was· a long .time· ass·ociate ·of his and tiat··.in .ari. · · : . . ., 1. •. - earlier occas--fon ·they· had met"J.n·_ prison. On. 24/.11}89. the .seventh . .l • • , . • •• ... 1 ~ . l ~ : ~ : ·.! J 'f. .. , accused '-q-a.m(}i'.;irr :,a taxi- ·at s· a·.'m .-. :t_o take him to ,a .p1'acl= near :the . : ,:. . Arusha · i;\erod'rome:·. ·Thei·e ·he met,' among .. -ther people, J:h.e second appelLu.n'.t'; J,'a_ter;:"n~ar "Sto 'codstant±"n~~ those other people· but n·o-t himsilf, _ were taken in the· s•ame ··-motor 'vehicle ,with the. . . . ~ . . • i : , r . seventh acqsed tO' a- ·plc:Ice where·,--the.y · loaded certain goods - i-nt<D ·,. the car -Tl;l;ereaf:ter hei 'was. give·n. a lift· in the car o town. - He ali:5htea· and the car ahd 'its. occ'tlpants proceeded· to Kir'iche -,-· Gu·est.H6t1S<3o .- :-Out of curios·ity,'h·e ·a1·6 went to·th ·Guest House. He s.:fr1 ;-c:>ods: 'b.e'ing offload:c(' nd -,ee kep'!: in oom ·. numbe-r. seven. - ·P.w.12 - D/Constabiea• Pl6te~~~ "told :'.th ,.trial cou·rt that ;: '.," • • • • ' • .. ; f :·• •• : ·- the thirct'acti;i;5ed''took him to th~ ho;i,-;•·:f the first appellant ,,. and that·--:f::he ·first appei':3:'ant in· tu.in took h:trn to the home et the seventh accused at Olematejoo but the seventh acct:1Sed was riot at home. ::· '- :: - .. '. - ·,i ...• , ..... Il'l th8ir defence· ·b·. ~~th~ b~-t:h''-~~~:1 aAts ;denied= any involvement''with the robbery';or with'- tne· stelen"goods· The ,. fi•rst v.ppelliint· said. he-'did riot•know any_ of the_ 'pther accused .. . . .. . . .. ... ' .. ~ persons and that_ all the witn·esses who testified against· . .. ~ . . ,Y I • -1· . him were liars. :In· convictingooooo/4

: ,: ::.: :;: : . . .. .;. ,· . .. ~ ... , .-,., . ~ £' ·. '!,; l • , , ;;:·•.,' Ir{_nvictiA'<;J the appellants a.s charged, the trial . 1:1 lGurnc(l- resid!}t magf··trate $aj.d ,. and I quote·: ... · . w.- . ~::t ·:. /t ~ "On e evidence on. rec.ord it is· the 1st_, ... :: ·• .-,,::, ·s-.-~nd -7tl:va~~~sed;~e;qs :o posses_sd. · ::·. · ···:·'ti st0l:en prb'pe.i-tie~ imeiately · aftr · they . : . i· ~ ...... :-· ·: . . . . ' . . .• ·•i ,·.. . ' ,. . • ·•.•:had been stoien The qoctrinf-recent··· ·:· . ' . ·- ' ,. . . :).~ .... , . . .• .. :_ p_ossessi.on p·oi_n"ts at . .-hei):--· guilt.·_ :They _ae,. ... _..,, ... • ... -:·: guilty ot armed· robbery for thei;-e is no other .; ·: ---Jpianation .. as. to. h9 they. came· £6 poss~~-s __ .the . : . -- ·., ,, ·. . .' _said. properties: besides that' they are the robbers";. Mr. D•So:i'/ {-r.ned· Counsel ·f the appe'l:'l'ar1ts ·,. ·ha strongly·· . •·• , .. :4- t . . . . '. . ' .. at.tacked, his reas.on1ng ·by the trial· -mai:H:rate.· He said·· _there .. . - • .. • . . . . . . :· . - . . . . t •. , . .. ·, was .. no ,:wilep.ce that the _appellant;s wei:::e··-ev.er in actual possession of· ·the s·tolen soods '.to justify .ipvokj,ng .ttie d·oct.r;ine of ·recent . ... ~ , ... -- - .. ,.:'r, .. ,- .,;. · . ;":.'.· ·'. .. . posscssinfi on -them.' · · ' · .. ·. . . . . :--"-. I would 'iay that if_. the evide:oce of P-., W4 - Mende - was . :_. . .. ~ . .-"(,•; .· . ..... .. i. ;• . :>'-" • elieved, it would mean-··that first APP.ell ant had aG,tual .p·ossession of thc.-·goo<ll° t St ... Constanti_~~-·-ap;1. when they were being. transp:orted. to _Ki,t:ichE?·· Guest. House. Also i· if t½1e _re.tracted '- . . :.· ·,-'· J. . ., .. . . \ caution satement of th1i•first ap)?ellapt is .beLievd, the second\ '. · . .-. - ·:,:. . . .. ;., . . \ appellant c'ould al<? .. be _said. to have been in actua.~ possession

of the'.006ds. ·r'·sl}ould say ;al.so tht i;f'._'the 's·ame st?len goods

  • ~ ► • • • • • •• - 1 ··,. • f ' • ! • • were subsequently. taken ·and····kept iri the, room of the third . . . . ~ • \ . • ;- • ·. •· u ~ J ~ accused_ with· the knowledge and consen.t of · the appellants, ,they. ·......... i , ~ •• · ~ . --·.· could also be(said to be i'n' construct._,i-Ve possessl·on of the11, whi,ch i's as -od a Cor is• i-t s bad_'?) :-bing · in actual .poss.es'.:i.on. Seco11.dly, it .was; ·urg.e'e1 by Mr·l. _D 'iouza ·that the -t,.tiai j:ourt , . -- ' . . ,.) ,. . . . . should not. have acted. on the 'evidence .. of. PoWo4.;·· PoW.6 .?nd ·P.Wo1. . ·, . ::.· ... . . . . ' .. without exercising exreme:·cau_tlon •. Po W .. 4 was an accom,plic:;e- ' and P.W.G ··and PW.7 were at leas.t witnesss with .the1r own . .· ·'• . ' . .·, interests to serve. ' .;.' ·. ~ "": The: trial magistrate ac6epted, I. thin :ri.ghtly ~ tha_t . . . . . : ,· .,,, t •• . .-; ' .••• P.W.4 was an: aqorr.iplic~~ . __ 1t is indeed· di.fficult 'to ·lake him: as an inno~~hl arrier, .. ·,. H·i_s: ·.very .. ·:r~~~tt-i-on t by his: own . . . . . . .. . . ~ • . - i. i. : . . . . admission,. would. put. a oourt: on_. is 9~ard in dealing with his Gvidcnce.,, )l

IA . • 5 He hilS a previous c~~~ic'ti-bn of_ b.urglary. But as was .. poin.ted out by the ti::iaJ. . .magis frafe ·,_::th~. v°idn~~- ·of:. ari c:1ccm1plice ca-ft • • 0 .J , •• " i . • ". . . . 4 . l , , .. • • • " • • be nctcd on if aclqate+y-.-corr.oborated. ··He- tb9u,9h~ that P~~-•6 . .. . :}' ;: . . . ; . . .· and P.W.7--{>rbvided. th·,·n~eded oorroborat.fcin1;-

  • .. . ; . •'-:;' .. ·-.· ' ... ; : . ; , ·"{ .: . . . : . . . P.-w.6 ano- E>W-7 were employees of.the s.econ.d:accused who . ·~~ . . .,. . . . . . . ; . was hcnvily, i.mplis:c1ted ·al tho1-1gh .. he ad·. ttie · third acc\ised were lucky to scape -~~~vition·. · ;It:·Js· o·ssible.,-. _a,lj:hugh there was no evidence.,. 9 proye it, that in thei cf-es-per.ate. endea\r_x .. tq-· . :,. . : exculpc;1te thcmsel ves, the second and 3rd (third) ad::u~-d persoi:is . . .. . . . . r, . . . . could hav W.luenced t~ose.·.employees·· to give .e'fidence which would sh'i-ft s;uit to otherS-o: .. μ:t I- do. not. 9e.F the impression . that the ;ftl. a9 · 7~ ros·ecuio~ .-wi tne-;sses·· w~~~, makng : spcil . ;: . '· '.. . :: . ....... ·• . . ·. .. . .:i. . ,. effort to ·tmr; ► .Jic;ate ·the: ·.appel;t;ans., __ Bo-th. tho_s.7'· wi th'esses hqd· really said :that the two 'appell_aJ'.l.ts ·were ati h Gues·t· HQuse at _a ... ~ . . . ~ . . . time when the seventh accusd was. in or they .cam~ a.t a late;-. . . . : ; . time to ask fqr the seventh accused. That e_v.i,dence"· taken -in. isolation doe·s':·-no_t implicate th~,appellants with· an§: Qffence, - . although it raises .,usp,i-cicm··ag-qinst·".;them. ,. /""'.... --:., '- :· .. . '·. ,.. . ' As regards the first''c3ppe-llant., ·not only was he implicated by P.u.4, in his cwn:re,:racted statement he in a way crroborate. ·.i ·. •. ·-: .. - .. "" :-· :_.., Lr t.: .. ,. ·.:.. ''1: . !'ti·... .. .:, . ·• ........ ,;· .. l'...,. ·__; _ .. • P.W.4 that l'!e was found.'with--:the goods when the seventh accused ., .:.,· .. ..; .'L. ':-.:-- • -~ .· .} t~ :;. (, ·. tj· . t ··r ·': t. f',v ..... •• w~nt in .;:he txi to_gether- wt:th the seventh accused to St. Constantine • .. n ~ d-.. '" • __ .·- t•i .i ... 1 ..· 1 .. , • _r· ·" . 1. - ·rJ. . . .. · - .... His being seen at the Kiric Guest Hnuse adds '·anotheriink ·· • 7 ·· ·. . . .. • ,.. ·1 : V" -''f"••1' ... _.· ... : .,,.. ·- 't .... ~ '"""-1' .1, in the· dhain .of -vid-ce' impiict:i<;r'°him 0 -.,. -F-urtheror'e' ailhbtigh .:' . ·- ~ . J. ,--:~ t. . 6. r. ~~ .· :: .\n t:: : ::r··j•:,; ·, >~-:----= : -;•,-t· -- the first .appellant claimed he did not know any of the ac~~sed .!. ~ • ·: · l, - : ,. : . : :. i n .. · ·.,, ·. = . · · .. -; i. -.; :. • .... l t: J t: . ~ o ·.,/ t •. L ·-; persons, yet he took P.W.12 tn the home of the seventh accused . ,. .. " , . .: t . ' . .. !' l . 4 r . • . ' ,.. f ., , • • •.; i •• ..- p t2rS on. I thi th-at n the ey'u ece . i 1 t "'w a· 'o-p:en for te. trial .::-: .. :. ... . .·· · ,· ... · ... ... t;. : ., .:. ·c ., .. : -i ~ 1 l . tn. . .:: : '. . -:"-~~:,::. · _-. _, .1 "'1: mngistrate to believe P .w.4 that the first appellant was met :; . . . _.1..,: :, .. : ·:n::c.:c.: ' ' :. . . .L. / :•: t 5. •,;: '1 *ii _ :-), , · .. : ~~ r;t1 at St. c;onsta11tine on the morning of 24/11/89 with the s tqlen . . • ... . . . - . -. :. t..,, . r :, . · t: !.. • :1 t r t c. . .· . : . - 0 • .; ... 1 goods. That was . .only a few .ours . after the robbeY. • · He · . ·'t . . ·. ; t.:t . .t .C".! ··- rl ' .. ;, ,· . .:. ... · .. "; ... ,_" : , •, .:> .". • ... 1 ...... hlpd to load them into the taxi, not as a mere casual labourer • . • . ... .. .. •• 't.._,•. - .. •; • •'!.;:. ,. ' '-..i• ~ ... • ·,.,: l• '" ••• :.,,, t, ~ The doctrine of recent possession was properly invoked against · · • l,; ·-: .. r· . · .. :r.t. : · ·;;t ,!,-~ ... s" '": ....... ·, .. v_rJt~·~ .... ~ t:"!. r.:. -··" t .. : _ ·:.: ... · The second appellant had been mentioned in the first .. : : • . ...... : • . "~ 't f .~ .. ., r:-. : ,;-;. ::.,",.. ~ .. k.:r6 .~.1 appellant's retracted caution statement • . :J . . . ~ .... ~- ~· :: . • ' ;, , :1 t .: .. l ' l,; ·• ,. ... ' • :. l "l .

., ••• . . # • ,. '. •• :,'.ft:" ·.nr:> j - :1 •'. t f :· ::·r:.1.:;J:~}t:·,· .. -;.'.:::- :, , .. , .'::i • .... i.. , ••• ~ .I\ ., . . ... ... :-. :;;;-:/:/'•>-~t~~/-i/. : :,; f "'':l :~ .::•iij .. :·. ;<: ·,-~ .,., .·-:t :J:v·li_. -. _ ► ..... < ., . .i.. s,,!l Thnt 1,:Nc/= (..-c!'rit-\3'/.\j£s\t . .,1··:ctjn-AWC.r;,!h . ·: .. · · ·' .: ·.-j· ~:) :. ·• .... <. · .:! · , · t . ~ L1 .:; .. · . J tr : t.. .. ~ : , ·; ;-· ~.- . , - • .f . . .L -: • .. _ ·•• ... '· .. • :- • • ..... c.,. [j fac:t -t!}pj; ~e ,•,:as.·Fs-'lfew w.tth ±he!,~ia1i.t-.@P-ie.iT\tr~~~te; . .',.:: .,' ... · :"' -· J.. ... - .... C1G. I • .f ...... :,,u c.·t• ·"; ... ., .• "":.: .- •• .;. .•. ,.. ~ 1 •• •.. 1. ,•·r · --·- ....... ,:.;,n)l' d'evI?1¥£ri 1 J¼e,J~~~~~ cg~ -;-;q.11~/,~~---!cqt ~~ydi;:h~e-·tt,at/.Jo.uld ,:.[. ·:~j • ~ ,, L .. _ '--"-- ••• ; __ r·.,1 --;-:·•r ~ n· . ._ -,.... . ~ .,,_ ~~ !-"'=''-..-- · ~ . •-·----f : .. )1l sur;f¢1i01f!•Y.·Ji:fhi#-:W.i{ttJ·c;tl'fe:,.;cl):<(;-h';Rh,~~be,s. 1 t·-a1;,.:_ :/ ···::'~-.: . . - .. - c: .... •.. .,, c.... __ 1., ...... 1- --+ ~ ....., • , ·.> j .. . . " . . . - . ~ ........... :.. .. •. 1~ . . . , n.;.. he had .• 0onc to. the g~~s t h()US ~ innocently cfinot b(:! uld out.;:::_ -, .&- .. J, ..!. • ,. .!!,":'.•:) '/·,r,,j . .!~ ;"' f ('• .•• • ·.p.-...•',r r•j·.,.. .. , .. ·•. • . -•-·.'1.{·rl The trip.:(@t risrh6.t+d -Ei::r:te:foce.d:iv:=-\¼ ji;tf<trf: th.~ .e.vi_ctenc;e ·'. :.d • ,, .. H·-· ✓, .... '·.<"';'. .. :·:.. , .. , , : !!'i: • :.j '>- :1..:-:: -.,.~~~ 1 •;::,: -~~-.·?-· --. :.J.tl.!. • ;.-4 a92.1t)??~~ sefpnd ,•.?ffe~},boS 2.j~ 0 w~~Js 6 ? r_J_,~~~;-¥,. 1 ht{i.,-;-9i::'l :.:(;;·' ..... , • ' • ,.,J . ' ' ... , ;_ :7. ;-- . . • . • ,J, - ..... convict(:.-<l ns charged. '-.._ ,.: . • :-· . ; : j . ..; : ~ :· ... , ;. ., ..•.. , . •'• . . -:.,:fz9E.:. -~~ aJ-Jpv. re~~,?ns I. } . dfmis J:h< p·eal': against·· the· f!i:t;1-l'.>.f.fl:ny,Jci1.: ·J-t 'Miifgr:· ,The'' sen-titce:'of_ '30 yaar·. • . • - ,, i. -• ' I , c. ~ '" • ., •• .": .• •. ,. - • imP.i:::isonmeh( is -statutory f0r arrne,:l ·rob'ber·y;· .... 'f-i'wevi'ir, th'e • ~ · yr: .::.:..: l•.,,,r...J.J .. :. ;.:}..,1f~:.,.'/;:: .. tj .!1:... 1:-•.,,' ., ·• ""\4[,.• ,,,.·;. ·.·•.•, .. }i_.,, , .app.M): :;i.n ..res'p_ec't of .:the. second appe.,liartt° p·alo· Cheupe · Huss'.ein• .. • ·- ~ .... •-•--•·-Gt, .,. c,"-/. J .': •.·,-, ... ,... - . ·•.,. . · ·•.• i Doo is ,μ,owed •... The~~~~.;iti;n i,· q.ia~,h~~ 1 ind· fhi~~entence .. . ·.,·:, ,4:~ .... 1:1..J..' • .n:1 ••{."• ? ; ;":f' O •t:,.. .,:• , •••P•' ! • ( / -1 p : • • of~ iP rYJr· iPr,s_of.ment i,s set .aside. He, should be set free for¥1\t:th un-~.ss he is held for' some other ·1.'awfUl .cause. JAN/HJK.

  • . .-.............-..a-: I Ji:,.'.,.i, , r !.... 7 2 ... :r _, ·.1 :..,..-f:· ·i .j.,,vc;l .J •• I j .;. :~ :'.. : •,ri j n:).I_c- .. "!°-=-·. ~-:-: ~):: ·1.j· -··.[ ·' .1 • l J; I '. .,, . .

Discussion