Abdallah Abdu vs Abdallah Bakari ((PC) Civil Appeal No. 105 of 1989) [1990] TZHC 153 (27 September 1990)
Judgment
DJ THE HIGH CC-UT 03' TJ,IIZiI-TIA
(Pc) CIVIL J\PPEAL no.10.5/89
(ORIGIH11L PROBATJ: i:.lD il:Jl·::IiES'i':.ii'I'IGiT no.217/88
ABDALLAH ABDU • • • • • • 0 • •
• •
• • l1Pl?ELLJ..IJT
ABDALLAH BA1Q\iTI • • . . .. .
• • •
• • o RESPOIIDEHT
I wil1 doa1 with tho :fi1.d District\
Court.
hacl to
I have also
ta::.;:011. ir:..to caI1siclo1...,2s:t i to:.:i conco:rning foe for
Tl,.o High Court record
vory clearly sho.,;.rs ths t tho 2.
1
):._:-,onl took 2 short po:riod to
cioposo of• . I agr.oo tlw. t tho loar.aod Counsel for tho d0cr_'cc
holder had: to uGc hio v:0.lu2.bl0 ti;:10 to otudy the proc.oodings
of tho two Courts below, i.e. the Prir..1nry Court.atio of -;:;c fctct tI"J.2t tl"lo o:;_J:__:oni to sic1o
•
is 11.0-'c a la.vr.rGr 21:-c1 t ~ cm_ guided by tho. prin1.01..,o:?ci.,o -c.:0 21,.,gL1:·_1or1ts in the Fiigl:.. Qot.1t
e
,-ro:co not holly c.ot.s.todv :·Thil,Jl'\ -......
that: the aucces.s.f'ul_party s.i.1.ou.1.c1 DC aaoquately compcn.sat:0.a., ·
on tho other hand I am mindfu1 of the fact that tho parties
to ,cho procoodingn ur0 juGt peaGnnt::; fror.1 the village and·
th0r.0fore they are not economically enviable to meet high
c.ootc for legal rep_rosep.ta•tion. In tho circumstances th.cre-
·fore I am of tho czj6~~~-.0ci · o,,enion th2..t the claim of'
ohs.30,000/=· against item ·IJo.1 io ve-;.:1 much on the higher
Gide., For this 1:-:,eaaon I r.m.st red-uc.0 it to shs12,ooo/=,
i.e. I have ··t'axed-.6:t hs.18,000/=• Itemo No.2, 3:, 4, 5 & 6
ar0-. all owe cl as they are 1-ri thin the s cs le.
Wi tl-i regard to i toma 12 to 15 inclw3iV'.e, -th0ne have boon
.. ' ..
.,., # s.truck o:ff because they arc coots• ordinarily·-·pqyable to
... , . .,,:
Th.in ooano shs ·.800j.;=:.
Advocntea a:ici not to
is struck off the bill. It01:116 Hill now bc·5.9% of sh_.400/=
againot i..torno 2 to 6"incluoi-vc ··d::::.ich io shs.200/=•
.:... 2 -
hE-.:3 cor.plc.i:;::ocl t:1.e t tho c:oc:i:."'OO nolc:oi"' :·1ao not produced
rocoipt;:; to cu:_:; 1 )0:i.
1
t t:C10 clc::L:1. ··
'I'horo:.foro tho judgment debtor -;rill co,;1::,,c:nsatc tho docrco
holc1er ::fr:01-1ove1."', tho judc::10;:1t", 0.0bto1.
1
l:.as concoc.od thnt cnch o,.-•3 o::' -thor.-:: w2s ,o.ying r:;;:;.o • '1.Curring oir::iilar COG ts f I -;.rill aJ..lm·r 5 · tripa only· in f'avow..80/ = f'r.o",i
1kwiriri to Dar cs Sc.lc:u;:.1 as 2. a:t:0.1.glo t:e.
1
i::.:: • In i..,0J0ur.n they
·vroi"'G nlso }:)aying Gl-:1.c ,.L:.80/=• ':i_l.1.0 cioc:.
1
00 hole.lo:."' h&s. c1air.10c.:
Do- rr 10 000/- ..L L •-'l.!.w e t , -
,.... .
02r:.co
io.z,l}OO/= in :.
1
00:,oct of: i-tor:: 17• The 1,Jholo bill.
vill now :.."'oad shsJ5,ooo/=, tl-:.2.t is -t:20 bill i.o taxed at
s:1s .15 ,ooo/= only,
A • C • l'lfrIBr-1.A
D/HolC::.cr
Ai~c.alld1. Abdul
.
\