Case Law[2022] ZAGPJHC 147South Africa
K v K (22/8285) [2022] ZAGPJHC 147 (14 March 2022)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
14 March 2022
Headnotes
from a parent, the parent of a child is entitled to know their whereabouts. I will therefore make such an order under the common law rather than under the Act.
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2022
>>
[2022] ZAGPJHC 147
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## K v K (22/8285) [2022] ZAGPJHC 147 (14 March 2022)
K v K (22/8285) [2022] ZAGPJHC 147 (14 March 2022)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2022_147.html
sino date 14 March 2022
SAFLII
Note:
Certain
personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
redacted from this document in compliance with the law
and
SAFLII
Policy
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA,
GAUTENG
DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
CASE
NO: 22/8285
REPORTABLE:
NO
OF
INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
14/3/2022
In
the matter between:
K[....],
P[....]
(ID
No:
[....])
Applicant
and
K[....],
T[....] I[....] (born S[....])
(ID
No:
[....])
Respondent
JUDGMENT
MOORCROFT
AJ:
Order
[1]
In this urgent application heard on 8 March
2022 I granted the following order on 9 March 2020:
“
1.
The respondent is directed to disclose the physical address where the
minor children S[....] D[....]
S[....] K[....] and S[....] N[....]
S[....] K[....] reside, and any future or alternative temporary or
permanent physical address,
to the applicant.
2.
The Family Advocate is requested to forthwith proceed with an
investigation and report, and
the parties shall, together with the
minor children, attend at the Office of the Family Advocate for the
scheduled appointment
on 4 May 2022 at 09h00.
3.
Pendente lite the children’s care and contact with the
applicant and the respondent
shall be as follows:
3.1.
The children shall spend alternate weeks with the applicant and
respondent, commencing with the applicant
collecting the children
from school on Monday, 14 March 2022 and returning them to school on
Monday, 21 March 2022 from where they
will return home with the
respondent, to be collected by the applicant again the following
Monday, and so on.
3.2.
It shall be the responsibility of the parent in whose care the
children are to ensure that they attend school.
3.3.
If the children are for any reason not attending school, the parent
in whose care the children are at the
time shall immediately inform
the other parent of the reason and of the precise whereabouts of the
children or the child in question.
4.
Each party shall have daily electronic or telephonic contact with the
children at 18h00 on
each day that the children are in the other
party’s care.
5.
The applicant shall have the children for the second half of the
March/April 2022 school
holiday period.
6.
The applicant shall have the children for the first half of the
July/August 2022 school holiday
period.
7.
The applicant shall have the children for the second half of the
September/October 2022 school
holiday period.
8.
The applicant shall have the children for the second half of the
December 2022/January 2023
school holiday period.
9.
The parties are given leave to file supplementary affidavits upon
receipt of the Family Advocate’s
report and recommendations.
10.
Each party shall pay his or her own costs.
Introduction
[2]
The parties are married and are the parents
of 4-year old twins born in 2018. The respondent also has a child
from a previous relationship
who lives in Kwazulu-Natal.
[3]
The marriage relationship floundered in
October 2021 and the respondent left the matrimonial home on
18 February 2022. Divorce
proceedings are pending.
[4]
The parties signed two settlement
agreements in November 2021 and February 2022 that provided for
shared residence of the children
in November 2021 and February
2022 but these are now the subject of a dispute on the ground that
they were allegedly signed
under duress.
The children’s
residential address
[5]
The respondent refused to disclose her and
the children’s residential address to the applicant and the
applicant is uncertain
as to their whereabouts. He also alleges and
it is not disputed that the children do not attend preschool
regularly.
[6]
The respondent previously suggested shared
residence in WhatsApp messages and a handwritten note attached to the
papers. It would
appear that shared residence was not a contentious
issue until February 2022. Contrary to the correspondence and the
WhatsApp messages,
it is alleged in the plea also filed in February
2022, that the applicant was abusive towards the minor children.
[7]
The disputes as to the validity of the
settlement agreements and the permanent residence of the minor
children are matters to be
dealt with in the divorce action. The
allegations of abuse and duress do not go into great detail and
relate to the relationship
between the parties rather than the
applicant’s relationship with the minor children.
[8]
The respondent launched domestic violence
proceedings on an
ex parte
basis and these proceedings have not been finalised. The allegations
relate to the alleged conduct of the applicant towards the
respondent
rather than towards the minor children.
[9]
In February 2022 the respondent’s
attorney offered access to the minor children under supervised
contact by her nanny on condition
that primary residence remain with
the respondent but subsequently the respondent informed the applicant
that the nanny was not
prepared to fulfil this role because she was
traumatised by abuse that she had seen and endured. These allegations
are denied by
the applicant.
[10]
Section 22 of the Children’s Act, 38
of 2005, provides for a parental responsibilities and rights
agreements and section 35
of the Act makes it an offence to act
contrary to an order of Court or to a parental responsibilities and
rights agreement.
[11]
The applicant relies on the section but it
is not applicable. In the absence of extraordinary circumstances
requiring the place
of residence to be withheld from a parent, the
parent of a child is entitled to know their whereabouts. I will
therefore make such
an order under the common law rather than under
the Act.
Shared residence
[12]
It appears from the affidavits that shared
residence was common cause when the Whatsapp messages referred to
above were written.
I am satisfied that
pendente
lite
shared residence is the best
interests of the children.
[13]
The shared residence arrangements in the
disputed settlement agreements are convoluted and complex and the
order I have made in
this regard is intended to simplify the shared
residence arrangements to avoid disputes and the unnecessary constant
dislocation
of the minor children who need certainty and consistency.
J
MOORCROFT
ACTING
JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
DIVISION
JOHANNESBURG
Electronically
submitted
Delivered:
This judgement was prepared and authored by the Acting Judge whose
name is reflected and is handed down electronically
by circulation to
the Parties / their legal representatives by email and by uploading
it to the electronic file of this matter
on CaseLines. The date of
the judgment is deemed to be
14 March 2022
COUNSEL
FOR THE APPLICANT: Ms M Feinstein
INSTRUCTED
BY:
Clarks Attorneys
COUNSEL
FOR RESPONDENT: Mr Mafu
INSTRUCTED
BY:
Bongani Dyani Attorneys
DATE
OF HEARING:
8 March 2022
DATE
OF ORDER:
9 March 2022
DATE
OF JUDGMENT:
14 March 2022
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
K v K (2020/6614) [2022] ZAGPJHC 901 (3 November 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 901High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
K v K (8285/2022) [2022] ZAGPJHC 736 (3 October 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 736High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)100% similar
S v K (A3139/2021) [2022] ZAGPJHC 801 (11 October 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 801High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
K.A v K.N (2024-063373) [2024] ZAGPJHC 617 (27 June 2024)
[2024] ZAGPJHC 617High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
S v Kekana and Others (SS65/2021) [2022] ZAGPJHC 1065 (7 March 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 1065High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar