Case Law[2022] ZAGPJHC 509South Africa
DT on behalf of D.V. v Road Accident Fund (30913/2017) [2022] ZAGPJHC 509 (3 August 2022)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)
3 August 2022
Headnotes
in the trust;
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg
>>
2022
>>
[2022] ZAGPJHC 509
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## DT on behalf of D.V. v Road Accident Fund (30913/2017) [2022] ZAGPJHC 509 (3 August 2022)
DT on behalf of D.V. v Road Accident Fund (30913/2017) [2022] ZAGPJHC 509 (3 August 2022)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2022_509.html
sino date 3 August 2022
SAFLII
Note:
Certain
personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
redacted from this document in compliance with the law
and
SAFLII
Policy
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA,
GAUTENG
DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG
CASE
NO: 30913/2017
REPORTABLE:
NO
OF
INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
REVISED.
03.08.2022
In
the matter between:
D
[....] 1 F [....] T [....] on behalf of
D
[....] 2 V
[....]
plaintiff
and
ROAD
ACCIDENT FUND
defendant
## JUDGMENT
JUDGMENT
CRUTCHFIELD
J:
[1]
This matter served before me on Thursday 28 and Friday 29 July 2022,
in
respect of a claim for damages brought by the plaintiff pursuant
to injuries and their
sequelae
suffered by the plaintiff’s
child as a result of a motor vehicle collision (‘the
collision’).
[2]
The plaintiff is D [....] 1 F [....] T [....] in her
representative
capacity as the biological mother and legal guardian
of D V, born on 20 December 1999.
[3]
The defendant is the Road Accident Fund established under
s 2(1)
of
the
Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996
. The defendant did not appear
at the trial.
[4]
Certain heads of damages became settled prior to the trial commencing
before me. The issues of the plaintiff’s loss of income earning
capacity and general damages came before me for determination.
[5]
This judgment deals with the applicable contingencies to be applied
to
the plaintiff’s claim for loss of income earning capacity.
[6]
The plaintiff, a minor at the time that the collision occurred on 2
October
2016 and upon inception of these proceedings was represented
by her mother in the litigation. The defendant was the Road Accident
Fund.
[7]
The plaintiff was a major when the matter came before me.
[8]
In respect of the plaintiff’s future loss, the plaintiff’s
counsel submitted that a contingency of 15% should be applied to the
pre-morbid scenario and a contingency of 30% on the post morbid
scenario, resulting in a claim of R2 506 476.00 for loss of
income earning capacity.
[9]
In
Road
Accident Fund v Gueddes,
[1]
referring to
Goodall
v President Insurance Co Ltd
[2]
,
the court applied a ‘sliding scale’ of 0.5% per year to
retirement age.
[10]
The victim is currently of 21 years and seven months of age and her
anticipated age of
retirement is 65 years.
[11]
Upon an application of the ‘sliding scale,’ a pre-morbid
contingency of 21%
is appropriate in this matter. A post- morbid
contingency of 15% is ordinarily utilised in matters such as this.
[12]
The contingencies abovementioned applied to the plaintiff’s
actuary’s calculations
under scenario 1 result in a loss
of R2 196 925.00 in respect of the claim for loss of
earning capacity.
[13]
The plaintiff’s
claim for general damages stands to be referred to the HPCSA for a
determination on whether the plaintiff’s
injuries qualify as
serious in terms of
regulation 3
of the Road Accident Fund
regulations of 2008.
[3]
[14]
The victim agreed to the establishment of a trust for the protection
of the proceeds of
the claim in the light of the brain injury
sustained by her in the collision.
[15]
In the circumstances, an order was granted in the following terms:
1.
The defendant shall pay the sum of R2 196 925.00 (two million,
one hundred
and ninety six thousand, nine hundred and twenty five
rand), to the plaintiff’s attorneys, MOSUNGWA ATTORNEYS, in
settlement
of the plaintiff’s claim for future loss of earnings
arising from the injuries she sustained in the motor vehicle
collision
that occurred on 2
October 2016 and its
sequalae
, which amount shall be paid to the plaintiff’s
attorneys by direct transfer into their trust account, details of
which are
as follows:
Account Name:
MOSUNGWA ATTORNEYS TRUST ACCOUNT
Account number:
[....]
Branch:
Johannesburg
Bank:
Standard Bank
2.
The capital amount referred to in paragraph 1:
2.1
Is payable within 180 days from date of the order;
2.2
Will bear interest at the rate of 10.25% per annum calculated from
and including
the 15 (FIFTEENTH) calendar day after the date of this
order up to and including the date of payment thereof.
# 3.The defendantshall
provide the plaintiff with an undertaking as envisaged in section
17(4)(a) of Act 56 of 1996, for 100% of the costs of the
future
accommodation in a hospital or nursing home and such treatment,
services or goods as the plaintiff may require as a result
of the
injuries that she sustained in the accident on 2October
2016,as set out in the medico legal
reports obtained on behalf of the plaintiff, after such costs have
been incurred and upon proof thereof,which
costs shall include:
3.
The defendant
shall
provide the plaintiff with an undertaking as envisaged in section
17(4)(a) of Act 56 of 1996, for 100% of the costs of the
future
accommodation in a hospital or nursing home and such treatment,
services or goods as the plaintiff may require as a result
of the
injuries that she sustained in the accident on 2
October
2016,
as set out in the medico legal
reports obtained on behalf of the plaintiff, after such costs have
been incurred and upon proof thereof,
which
costs shall include:
# 3.1The costs to be incurred in the
establishment of a trust tointer
aliaprotect, administer
and/or manage the capital amount and the proceeds thereof referred to
in paragraph 1 of this order;
3.1
The costs to be incurred in the
establishment of a trust to
inter
alia
protect, administer
and/or manage the capital amount and the proceeds thereof referred to
in paragraph 1 of this order;
## 3.2The costs of the appointment and
remuneration of the Trustees in administering the capital amount,
which remuneration shall amount
to 1% per annum on the amount held in
the trust;
3.2
The costs of the appointment and
remuneration of the Trustees in administering the capital amount,
which remuneration shall amount
to 1% per annum on the amount held in
the trust;
# 3.3The costs of administering the
statutory undertaking furnished in terms of section 17(4) (a) of the
Road Accident Fund Act; and
3.3
The costs of administering the
statutory undertaking furnished in terms of section 17(4) (a) of the
Road Accident Fund Act; and
# 3.4The costs of the annual security
bond/s to meet the requirements of the Master of the High Court in
terms of section 77 of the Administration
of Estates Act, No. 66 of
1965, as amended.
3.4
The costs of the annual security
bond/s to meet the requirements of the Master of the High Court in
terms of section 77 of the Administration
of Estates Act, No. 66 of
1965, as amended.
# 4.The defendant shall provide the
aforesaid Undertaking within fourteen (14) days of this order.
4.
The defendant shall provide the
aforesaid Undertaking within fourteen (14) days of this order.
# 5.The plaintiff’s
attorney,MOSUNGWA
ATTORNEYS,shall:
5.
The plaintiff
’
s
attorney
,
MOSUNGWA
ATTORNEYS
,
shall:
## 5.1Cause a trust (“the Trust”)
to be established in accordance with the Trust Property Control Act
No. 57 of 1988, within
six months of the date of granting of this
order and shall approach this Court for condonation and further
direction/s should the
Trust not be established within the said
period of six months;
5.1
Cause a trust (“the Trust”)
to be established in accordance with the Trust Property Control Act
No. 57 of 1988, within
six months of the date of granting of this
order and shall approach this Court for condonation and further
direction/s should the
Trust not be established within the said
period of six months;
## 5.2Deposit all proceeds in terms
hereof into an interest-bearing account, for the sole benefit of the
plaintiff, as contemplated in
the Legal Practice Act 28 of 2014,
pending the establishment of the Trust;
5.2
Deposit all proceeds in terms
hereof into an interest-bearing account, for the sole benefit of the
plaintiff, as contemplated in
the Legal Practice Act 28 of 2014,
pending the establishment of the Trust;
## 5.3Pay all monies held in trust by
them for the benefit of the plaintiff, to the Trust immediately upon
creation of the Trust;
5.3
Pay all monies held in trust by
them for the benefit of the plaintiff, to the Trust immediately upon
creation of the Trust;
## 5.4Be entitled to deduct their
disbursements from the aforesaid amount.
5.4
Be entitled to deduct their
disbursements from the aforesaid amount.
## 6.The Trust instrument contemplated
above shall make provision for the following:
6.
The Trust instrument contemplated
above shall make provision for the following:
## 6.1The plaintiff is the sole
beneficiary of the Trust during her lifetime and after her death, her
lawful descendants;
6.1
The plaintiff is the sole
beneficiary of the Trust during her lifetime and after her death, her
lawful descendants;
# 6.2The sole purpose of the Trust is to
administer the capital amount and the proceeds thereof referred to in
paragraph 1 of this order,
in a manner that best takes account of the
plaintiff’s interests;
6.2
The sole purpose of the Trust is to
administer the capital amount and the proceeds thereof referred to in
paragraph 1 of this order,
in a manner that best takes account of the
plaintiff’s interests;
## 6.3Subject to the approval of the
Master of the High Court, the First Trustees shall be:
6.3
Subject to the approval of the
Master of the High Court, the First Trustees shall be:
## 6.3.1THEMBA HAWULEGWE NXUMALO with
identity number [....], as representative of TRUST CARE (Pty) Ltd, as
an independent Trustee;
6.3.1
THEMBA HAWULEGWE NXUMALO with
identity number [....], as representative of TRUST CARE (Pty) Ltd, as
an independent Trustee;
## 6.3.2ETTUS ATHUR MAKAMU, an admitted
attorney of this court, as an independent Trustee;
6.3.2
ETTUS ATHUR MAKAMU, an admitted
attorney of this court, as an independent Trustee;
## 6.3.3D [....] 1 F [....] T
[....] , the mother of the plaintiff and a Trustee by virtue of being
a member of the plaintiff’s
family.
6.3.3
D [....] 1 F [....] T
[....] , the mother of the plaintiff and a Trustee by virtue of being
a member of the plaintiff’s
family.
### 6.4The two independent Trustee(s) are
to provide security to the satisfaction of the Master during the
lifetime of the plaintiff;
6.4
The two independent Trustee(s) are
to provide security to the satisfaction of the Master during the
lifetime of the plaintiff;
## 6.5The family member appointed as a
Trustee shall be exempt from filling security as a Trustee to the
Master of the High Court;
6.5
The family member appointed as a
Trustee shall be exempt from filling security as a Trustee to the
Master of the High Court;
## 6.6Ownership of the Trust property
vests in the Trustees of the Trust in their capacity as Trustees;
6.6
Ownership of the Trust property
vests in the Trustees of the Trust in their capacity as Trustees;
## 6.7The Trust property to be excluded
from any community of property or accrual arising from any valid
marriage concluded by the plaintiff;
6.7
The Trust property to be excluded
from any community of property or accrual arising from any valid
marriage concluded by the plaintiff;
## 6.8The Trustees be authorised to
recover the remuneration of and costs incurred by the Trustees in
administering the undertaking in
terms of section 17(4)(a) of Act 56
of 1996 in accordance with the Undertaking to be provided by the
defendant;
6.8
The Trustees be authorised to
recover the remuneration of and costs incurred by the Trustees in
administering the undertaking in
terms of section 17(4)(a) of Act 56
of 1996 in accordance with the Undertaking to be provided by the
defendant;
## 6.9The amendment or termination of the
Trust instrument be subject to the leave of this Court during the
lifetime of the plaintiff;
6.9
The amendment or termination of the
Trust instrument be subject to the leave of this Court during the
lifetime of the plaintiff;
## 6.10The Trust property and the
administration thereof be subject to an annual audit during the
lifetime of the plaintiff.
6.10
The Trust property and the
administration thereof be subject to an annual audit during the
lifetime of the plaintiff.
## 7.The Trust instrument shallinter
aliamake provision for
the following:
7.
The Trust instrument shall
inter
alia
make provision for
the following:
## 7.1The plaintiff to be provided with a
reasonable monthly allowance if reasonably required by the plaintiff;
7.1
The plaintiff to be provided with a
reasonable monthly allowance if reasonably required by the plaintiff;
## 7.2The number of Trustees of the Trust
shall be three (3) and such number shall not be exceeded or reduced;
7.2
The number of Trustees of the Trust
shall be three (3) and such number shall not be exceeded or reduced;
## 7.3The Trustees shall include at least
one (1) independent professional Trustee who must be properly
qualified to administer the Trust
assets;
7.3
The Trustees shall include at least
one (1) independent professional Trustee who must be properly
qualified to administer the Trust
assets;
## 7.4The composition of the board of
Trustees and the structure of the voting rights of the Trustees shall
be such that:
7.4
The composition of the board of
Trustees and the structure of the voting rights of the Trustees shall
be such that:
## 7.4.1The calling and holding of meetings
is specified;
7.4.1
The calling and holding of meetings
is specified;
## 7.4.2The taking of all resolutions is
properly regulated and recorded in writing;
7.4.2
The taking of all resolutions is
properly regulated and recorded in writing;
## 7.4.3Procedures to resolve any potential
disputes are specified;
7.4.3
Procedures to resolve any potential
disputes are specified;
## 7.4.4The independent Trustee/s cannot be
overruled or outvoted in relation to the management of the Trust
assets by any other Trustee/s;
7.4.4
The independent Trustee/s cannot be
overruled or outvoted in relation to the management of the Trust
assets by any other Trustee/s;
## 7.4.5A deadlock between the Trustees is
avoided;
7.4.5
A deadlock between the Trustees is
avoided;
## 7.4.6In the event of the number of
Trustees being reduced below three as prescribed; the remaining
Trustees are prevented and/or precluded
from acting otherwise than to
achieve the appointment of a replacement Trustee,
7.4.6
In the event of the number of
Trustees being reduced below three as prescribed; the remaining
Trustees are prevented and/or precluded
from acting otherwise than to
achieve the appointment of a replacement Trustee,
## 7.5No charge shall be made by the
Trustees in relation to the receipt of the initial or any subsequent
payment to the Trust of the
proceeds of the litigation.
7.5
No charge shall be made by the
Trustees in relation to the receipt of the initial or any subsequent
payment to the Trust of the
proceeds of the litigation.
## 7.6The powers of the Trustees shall be
exercised:
7.6
The powers of the Trustees shall be
exercised:
## 7.6.1Subject to the approval of the
Master of the High Court;
7.6.1
Subject to the approval of the
Master of the High Court;
## 7.6.2In a tax efficient and cost-
effective way at all times including but not limited to making
investments;
7.6.2
In a tax efficient and cost-
effective way at all times including but not limited to making
investments;
## 7.6.3With specific reference to the
circumstances of the plaintiff and such as to include but not be
limited to:
7.6.3
With specific reference to the
circumstances of the plaintiff and such as to include but not be
limited to:
## 7.6.3.1applying the nett income of the
Trust Fund and if that is not adequate at any time for the purpose,
the capital thereof, for the
maintenance of the plaintiff, her
general upkeep, welfare benefits and rehabilitation and the
acquisition or provision of residential
facilities or a residence for
the plaintiff. The income not used as aforesaid shall accumulate to
the capital;
7.6.3.1
applying the nett income of the
Trust Fund and if that is not adequate at any time for the purpose,
the capital thereof, for the
maintenance of the plaintiff, her
general upkeep, welfare benefits and rehabilitation and the
acquisition or provision of residential
facilities or a residence for
the plaintiff. The income not used as aforesaid shall accumulate to
the capital;
## 7.6.3.2The right to invest and reinvest
the Trust capital and/ or income subject always to the interests of
the plaintiff and her circumstances;
7.6.3.2
The right to invest and reinvest
the Trust capital and/ or income subject always to the interests of
the plaintiff and her circumstances;
## 7.6.4The duty of the Trustees or any one
of them to disclose any personal interest in any transaction
involving the Trust property, to
the Master of the High Court.
7.6.4
The duty of the Trustees or any one
of them to disclose any personal interest in any transaction
involving the Trust property, to
the Master of the High Court.
## 8.The plaintiff’s attorneys
shall not recover their fee/s until such time as the party and party
bill of costs has been taxed.
8.
The plaintiff’s attorneys
shall not recover their fee/s until such time as the party and party
bill of costs has been taxed.
## 9.The provisions of this order shall
be exercised in accordance with the provisions of the Trust Property
Control Act, No. 57 of 1988,
and, subject to the approval of the
Master.
9.
The provisions of this order shall
be exercised in accordance with the provisions of the Trust Property
Control Act, No. 57 of 1988,
and, subject to the approval of the
Master.
## 10.The defendant is directed to pay to
the plaintiff’s attorneys, the costs of the action to date
which costs shall include,
subject to the discretion of the Taxing
Master:
10.
The defendant is directed to pay to
the plaintiff’s attorneys, the costs of the action to date
which costs shall include,
subject to the discretion of the Taxing
Master:
## 10.1The costs attendant upon obtaining
payment of the capital amount set out in paragraph 1 hereof;
10.1
The costs attendant upon obtaining
payment of the capital amount set out in paragraph 1 hereof;
## 10.2The costs consequent upon the
employment of counsel, which costs shall include, preparation,
consultations, appearance on trial
on 28 and the reasonable costs of
29July 2022;
10.2
The costs consequent upon the
employment of counsel, which costs shall include, preparation,
consultations, appearance on trial
on 28 and the reasonable costs of
29
July 2022;
## 10.3The reasonable costs of the
reports, addendum reports, if any, RAF4 forms, joint minutes, if any,
and the preparation and reasonable
reservation costs to be determined
by the Taxing Master of the expert witnesses.
10.3
The reasonable costs of the
reports, addendum reports, if any, RAF4 forms, joint minutes, if any,
and the preparation and reasonable
reservation costs to be determined
by the Taxing Master of the expert witnesses.
## 11.The aforesaid costs are to be paid
by the defendant to the plaintiff’s attorneys to be held in
Trust as per paragraph 5 above.
11.
The aforesaid costs are to be paid
by the defendant to the plaintiff’s attorneys to be held in
Trust as per paragraph 5 above.
## 12.Payment of the costs is subject to
the following conditions:
12.
Payment of the costs is subject to
the following conditions:
## 12.1The plaintiff shall, in the event
that costs are not agreed, cause the notice of taxation to be served
on the defendant; and
12.1
The plaintiff shall, in the event
that costs are not agreed, cause the notice of taxation to be served
on the defendant; and
## 12.2The plaintiff shall allow the
defendant14 (fourteen) court days after taxation to make payment of
the taxed costs.
12.2
The plaintiff shall allow the
defendant14 (fourteen) court days after taxation to make payment of
the taxed costs.
## 12.3The defendant is directed to pay
interesta tempora moraon the aforesaid agreed
or taxed costs or any part thereof from 14 days after agreement or
taxation to date of payment.
12.3
The defendant is directed to pay
interest
a tempora mora
on the aforesaid agreed
or taxed costs or any part thereof from 14 days after agreement or
taxation to date of payment.
## 13.This order must be served by the
plaintiff’s attorneys on the Master of the High Court within 30
(thirty) days from the date
of this order.
13.
This order must be served by the
plaintiff’s attorneys on the Master of the High Court within 30
(thirty) days from the date
of this order.
## 14.The contingency fee agreement
concluded between the plaintiff and her attorneys of record is
declared invalid.
14.
The contingency fee agreement
concluded between the plaintiff and her attorneys of record is
declared invalid.
## 15.The issue of the plaintiff’s
general damages is:
15.
The issue of the plaintiff’s
general damages is:
## 15.1Separated in terms of Rule 33(4)
and postponedsine diepending the determination by the
HPCSA on whether the plaintiff’s injuries qualify as serious in
terms of regulation 3 of
the Road Accident Fund regulations of 2008.
15.1
Separated in terms of Rule 33(4)
and postponed
sine die
pending the determination by the
HPCSA on whether the plaintiff’s injuries qualify as serious in
terms of regulation 3 of
the Road Accident Fund regulations of 2008.
CRUTCHFIELD
J
JUDGE
OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
LOCAL DIVISION
JOHANNESBURG
Delivered:
This judgment was prepared and authored by the Judge whose name is
reflected and is handed down electronically by circulation
to the
Parties / their legal representatives by email and by uploading it to
the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. The
date of the
judgment is deemed to be
3 August 2022
.
COUNSEL
FOR THE APPLICANT:
Mr L L Mathebula
INSTRUCTED
BY:
Mosungwa Attorneys
COUNSEL
FOR THE DEFENDANT:
No appearance
INSTRUCTED
BY:
No appearance
DATE
OF THE
HEARING:
28 & 29 July 2022
DATE
OF
JUDGMENT:
3 August 2022
[1]
Road
Accident Fund v Guedes
2006
(5) SA 583
(SCA) at 587 – 588.
[2]
Goodall
v President Insurance Co Ltd
1978
(1) SA 389 (W).
[3]
Road
Accident Fund v Duma
2013
(6) SA 9
SCA para 19-20 (‘
Duma
’
);
Road
Accident Fund v Faria
2014
(6) SA 19
SCA para 34
(‘Faria’).
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
D.T and Another v MAMF (2023-119659) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1423 (8 December 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1423High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
D.T and Another v M.A.M.F (2023/032929) [2023] ZAGPJHC 1204 (24 October 2023)
[2023] ZAGPJHC 1204High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
DT v ST (1928/22) [2022] ZAGPJHC 176 (25 March 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 176High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South Africa Enterprise Development (PTY) Ltd v Kerani BTW CC (2021/7285) [2022] ZAGPJHC 371 (1 June 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 371High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar
South African Municipal Workers Union v Imbeu Development and Project Management (Pty) Ltd and Another (30236/2021) [2022] ZAGPJHC 1021 (21 November 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 1021High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)99% similar