City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Specitrim (Pty) Ltd and Others (2021/42636) [2022] ZAGPJHC 973 (7 December 2022)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: South Gauteng High Court, Johannesburg >> 2022 >> [2022] ZAGPJHC 973 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Specitrim (Pty) Ltd and Others (2021/42636) [2022] ZAGPJHC 973 (7 December 2022) City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality v Specitrim (Pty) Ltd and Others (2021/42636) [2022] ZAGPJHC 973 (7 December 2022) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPJHC/Data/2022_973.html sino date 7 December 2022 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG Case no. : 2021/42636 REPORTABLE:  NO OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO REVISED. In the matter between: THE CITY OF JOHANNESBURG METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY Appellant And SPECITRIM (PTY) LTD First Respondent EDMANET (PTY) LTD Second Respondent NOSKOP 1 (PTY) LTD Third Respondent UNLOCKED PROPERTIES 23 (PTY) LTD Fourth Respondent UNLOCKED PROPERTIES 5 (PTY) LTD Fifth Respondent LIMOWARE (PTY) LTD Sixth Respondent LISACRAFT (PTY) LTD Seventh Respondent Coram:                                            Dlamini J Date of hearing:                            12 October 2022 – in a ‘virtual Hearing’ during a videoconference on Microsoft Teams digital platform. Date of delivery of Judgment:    07 December  2022 This Judgment is deemed to have been delivered electronically by circulation to the parties’ representatives via email and shall be uploaded onto the caselines system. JUDGMENT [LEAVE TO APPEAL] DLAMINI J [1] This is an application for leave to appeal an order that I handed down on 18 January  2022. [2] The appellant is the City of Johannesburg Metropolitan Municipality (CoJ). [3] The respondents are the owners of various immovable properties falling within the municipal jurisdiction of the CoJ, the appellant in its capacity as the Local Governing Municipality. [4] The numb of the issue is whether the appellant has correctly charged the respondents using the correct tariff for services the CoJ delivered to the respondents. [5] The effect of my order was that the appellants are directed to engage and interrogate the respondent's various municipal accounts to ensure that the respondents have been correctly billed. [6] The test for granting leave to appeal is now a higher one. [7] The trial court may now only grant leave to appeal if it is of the opinion that the appeal would have a realistic chance of success and not may have a reasonable prospect of success. The legislator’s use of the would in section 17(1)(a)(i) of the Superior Court Act imposes a most stringent and vigorous threshold. [8] This concept was captured thus by the court in Member of the Executive Council of Health Eastern Cape v Mikhita and another [1] where the court held that a court may now only grant leave to appeal if it is of the opinion that the appeal would have a realistic chance of success not may have a reasonable chance of success. A mere possibility of success or even an arguable case is not enough. [9] Having read the applicant's reasons to appeal and heard both Counsels during argument, I am of the view that no court will come to a different conclusion that the one that I have reached. [10] No other Court would give a contrary decision from the order which I granted on    18 January 2022. In all the above circumstances the appllant has failed to make out its case. ORDER 1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. DLAMINI J JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG LOCAL DIVISION, JOHANNESBURG Date of hearing:                     12 October  2022 Delivered:                               07 December 2022 For the Appellant: Adv Emmanuel Sithole Email: esithole@law.co.za Instructed by:                          Mr Hugo Baloyi (Madlopa & Thenga Inc.) Email: hugo@madlopathenga.co.za For the Respondents : Adv T Paige-Green Email: tpaigegr@clubadvocates.co.za Instructed by:                          Mr Graig Green (Schindler attorneys) Email: Green@schindlers.co.za [1] 1221/2015 [2016] ZASCA 176 (25 NOVEMBER 2016 at 16) sino noindex make_database footer start