Kgalemo Construction CC and Others v Small Enterprise Finance Agency SOC Ltd (54791/2017) [2025] ZAGPPHC 215 (3 March 2025)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAGPPHC 215 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Kgalemo Construction CC and Others v Small Enterprise Finance Agency SOC Ltd (54791/2017) [2025] ZAGPPHC 215 (3 March 2025) Kgalemo Construction CC and Others v Small Enterprise Finance Agency SOC Ltd (54791/2017) [2025] ZAGPPHC 215 (3 March 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2025_215.html sino date 3 March 2025 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO.: 54791/2017 (1)    REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2)    OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3)    REVISED: NO Date:  3 March 2025 E van der Schyff In the application for leave to appeal of: Kgalemo Construction CC                                          First Applicant Wilhelmina Semeemee Aphane                                 Second Applicant Lehumo Makgalemele Aphane                                   Third Applicant and Small Enterprise Finance Agency SOC Ltd                Respondent JUDGMENT Van der Schyff J [1] The applicants seek leave to appeal against the judgment and order handed down on 19 November 2024. [2] The applicants in this application were the applicants in the application for the rescission of the default judgment granted against them on 15 May 2023, heard by me. [3] The principles governing the granting of leave to appeal are trite and need not be set out herein. A written judgment was handed down on 19 November 2024, and it is unnecessary to revisit the reasons underpinning the order. [4] I have considered the grounds of appeal, and I am not of the opinion that the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success. There is no other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard. The application for leave to appeal stands to be dismissed. ORDER In the result, the following order is granted: 1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. E van der Schyff Judge of the High Court Delivered:  This judgment is handed down electronically by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. For the first to third applicants:                   Adv. J. H. Sullivan Instructed by:                                           Waldick Incorporated For the respondent:                                  Adv. J. Van der Merwe Instructed by:                                           Tim du Toit & Co. incorporated Date of the hearing:                                  26 February 2025 Date of judgment:                                     3 March 2025 sino noindex make_database footer start