Baumann v DB Fine Chemicals (Pty) Ltd and Another (Variation) (2024-032290) [2025] ZAGPPHC 432 (9 May 2025)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAGPPHC 432 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Baumann v DB Fine Chemicals (Pty) Ltd and Another (Variation) (2024-032290) [2025] ZAGPPHC 432 (9 May 2025) Baumann v DB Fine Chemicals (Pty) Ltd and Another (Variation) (2024-032290) [2025] ZAGPPHC 432 (9 May 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2025_432.html sino date 9 May 2025 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO: 2024-032290 1.       REPORTABLE: YES/ NO 2.       OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES /NO 3.       REVISED: YES / NO DATE: 09/5/2025 SIGNATURE OF JUDGE: In the matter between: WERNER BAUMANN EXCIPIENT and DB FINE CHEMICALS (PTY) LTD 1ST RESPONDENT DION BAUMANN 2 ND RESPONDENT In Re : DB FINE CHEMICALS (PTY) LTD 1 ST PLAINTIFF DION BAUMANN 2 ND PLAINTIFF and WERNER BAUMANN DEFENDANT JUDGMENT HERSHENSOHN AJ [1]      This is a variation order envisaged in terms of Rule 42(1) (b) of the Uniform Rules of Court relating to the judgment I handed down electronically, by circulation to the parties' legal representatives on 6 May 2025. [2]      The Rule provides that the court may, in addition to any other powers it may have, mero motu rescind or vary an order in which there is an ambiguity, or a patent error or omission, but only to the extent of such ambiguity, error or omission. [1] [3]      On 7 May 2025, it came to my attention that the order contained in the judgement, did not include the scale of costs awarded to the parties. [4]      In correcting the order of the 6 May 2025 in terms of Rule 42 of the Uniform Rules of Court, I amend the order to read as follows: 4.1.   The costs awarded in terms of paragraphs 3 and 4 of my order granted on 6 May 2025 are to be party and party costs on scale “B”. HERSHENSOHN AJ ACTING JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT This Judgment was handed down electronically by circulation to the parties’ and or parties’ representatives by email and by being uploaded to CaseLines. The date and time for the hand down is deemed to be 10h00 on this 9 th day of May 2025 . Appearances Counsel for the Excipient: Adv. N du Plessis instructed by AH Stander & Agenbag Inc Counsel for the Respondents: Adv. L Van Gass Instructed by Van Greunen and Associates Inc Date of Hearing: 24 April 2025 Date of Amendment: 9 May 2025 [1] Rule 42(1)(b) of the Uniform Rules of Court. sino noindex make_database footer start