africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2025] ZAGPPHC 568South Africa

Mentoor v Magongoa and Others (084823/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 568 (2 June 2025)

High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)
2 June 2025
OTHER J, WRIGHT J, Wright J, the present hearing, an affidavit was

Judgment

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAGPPHC 568 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Mentoor v Magongoa and Others (084823/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 568 (2 June 2025) Mentoor v Magongoa and Others (084823/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 568 (2 June 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2025_568.html sino date 2 June 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA Case No: 084823/2023 (1)      REPORTABLE: No (2)      OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES:  No (3)      REVISED 2 June 2025 WRIGHT J In the matter between: RENEILWE LEGAE MENTOOR                                                             APPLICANT and ELIZABETH NALEDI MAGONGOA ( In her capacity as executrix )                                            FIRST RESPONDENT NELSON MAGONGOA                                                       SECOND RSPONDENT MASTER OF THE HIGH COURT                                          THIRD RESPONDENT ( Estate 7115/23 ) JUDGMENT WRIGHT J 1.     The applicant, Ms Mentoor is the daughter of a man who passed away on 10 August 2023. The first respondent, Ms Mangogoa is a relative of Ms Mentoor. Ms Mangogoa is the appointed executrix in the deceased estate. The cited second respondent, also a relative, has apparently passed away since the launch of the application. The third respondent apparently does not oppose the application. 2.     Ms Mentoor seeks a range of orders. The Master is to remove Ms Mangogoa as executrix, Ms Mangogoa is to disclose information and make payments to the estate and related relief is sought. 3.     Ms Mentoor says, in a somewhat terse founding affidavit,  that she agreed to the appointment of Ms Mangogoa as executrix in circumstances where she was deceived. Many irregularities in the winding up of the estate are alleged. 4.     Ms Mangogoa’s late answering affidavit raises huge disputes of fact which cannot be resolved on paper. Ms Mangogoa seeks condonation for the late filing of her answering affidavit as family deaths caused the affidavit to be late. 5.     On 1 June 2025, the day before the present hearing, an affidavit was filed  by Ms Engelbrecht, the agent of the present executor, Ms Elizabeth Magongoa, the first respondent. She says that 85% of the estate has been completed. Ms Engelbrecht is not a party to the present application. She wishes to be joined. Mr Ramapuputla, for the present applicant opposes such joinder. In the circumstances, the matter should be postponed and Ms Engelbrecht put on terms to deliver her application. 6.     In her answering affidavit, Ms Elizabeth Magongoa raises the defence of the non-joinder of Ms Engelbrecht. 7.     I make no finding on the question of whether or not Ms Engelbrecht can or should be joined. 8.     What complicates matters is that there is a related application, which it seems, may overlap the present application. In that application, an order has been made referring the matter to evidence or trial on at least one issue. 9.     In the circumstances, costs should be reserved. ORDER 1.     The matter is removed from the roll, costs reserved. 2.     Ms Engelbrecht must launch her application to intervene by 17 June 2025 at 4pm. GC Wright Judge of the High Court Gauteng Division, Johannesburg HEARD                   :    2 June 2025 DELIVERED           :    2 June 2025 APPEARANCES    : Applicant Att NE Ramapuputla Instructed by Ramapuputla Attorneys Inc ramapuputla.attorneys@gmail.com First Respondent Mr CL Mabasa Instructed by Mabasa CL Attorneys Inc mabasaclattorneys@gmail.com admin@mabasaclattorneys.co.za For Ms Engelbrecht Adv L Keijser Instructed by Pistorius Scheepers sino noindex make_database footer start

Similar Cases

Maroga v Minister of Defence and Military Veterans and Others (49002.2021) [2025] ZAGPPHC 988 (18 September 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 988High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Motau v Minister of Health and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 190; 43355/2021 (22 March 2023)
[2023] ZAGPPHC 190High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Mokone v Minister of Police (11971/2020) [2025] ZAGPPHC 1191 (4 November 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 1191High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Motau v Minister of Health and Others (43355/2021) [2022] ZAGPPHC 155 (15 March 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 155High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Sibeko v Mogashoa and Another (064969/2025) [2025] ZAGPPHC 752 (14 July 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 752High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar

Discussion