africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2025] ZAGPPHC 613South Africa

Economic Freedom Fighters (Pty) Ltd and Others v Gas Giants CC and Another (13850/2022) [2025] ZAGPPHC 613 (13 June 2025)

High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)
13 June 2025
OTHER J, STRIJDOM J, Respondent J, De J

Judgment

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAGPPHC 613 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Economic Freedom Fighters (Pty) Ltd and Others v Gas Giants CC and Another (13850/2022) [2025] ZAGPPHC 613 (13 June 2025) Economic Freedom Fighters (Pty) Ltd and Others v Gas Giants CC and Another (13850/2022) [2025] ZAGPPHC 613 (13 June 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2025_613.html sino date 13 June 2025 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH-AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA Case Number: 13850/2022 Heard on: 29 June 2025 Judgment:  13 June 2025 (1)        REPORTABLE: YES / NO (2)        OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES /NO (3)        REVISED: YES /NO DATE 13 June 2025 SIGNATURE In the matter between: THE ECONOMIC FREEDOM FIGHTERS First Applicant (PTY) LTD KHUTSO SEGAGE                                                                                     Second Applicant AGREE MATHEBULA                                                                                    Third Applicant MATOME SOLOMON MASIPA                                                                    Fourth Applicant and GAS GIANTS CC                                                                                        First Respondent WELL OF LIFE (PTY) LTD                                                                     Second Respondent JUDGMENT STRIJDOM, J [1]    In this matter the applicants apply for leave to appeal to the Full Court of this division against the whole of the judgment and order of Justice Sardiwala, which was delivered on 31 August 2023 with case number 13850/2022. [2]    The application is opposed by the respondents.  However, the respondents conceded that leave must be granted to the third applicant. [3]    The grounds of appeal are set out in the application for leave to appeal.  I do not intend to repeat same. [4] Section 17(1)(a) of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 provide that leave to appeal may only be granted where the Judge or Judges concerned are of the opinion that the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success; or if there is some compelling reason why the appeal should be heard including conflicting judgments on the matter under consideration. [5]    In respect of the application for leave to appeal against the whole of the judgment, the applicants raised as grounds a challenge to every finding made in the judgment. [6]    I have considered the evidence, the judgment of Justice Sardiwala, the grounds upon which this application for leave to appeal has been brought and the arguments advanced by the parties. [7]    I have also considered the reasons for the judgment and am of the view that there is a reasonable prospect that another Court would come to a different conclusion on the merits and law. [8]    Under the circumstances, it is ordered that: 8.1     Leave to appeal is granted in respect of all the applicants to a Full Court of the Gauteng Division Pretoria. 8.2     Costs will be costs in the appeal. JJ STRIJDOM JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA For the Applicants: Adv. F Sangoni Instructed by: Ian Levitt Attorneys For the first and second Respondent:      Adv. Mouton Instructed by: De Jager Inc Attorneys sino noindex make_database footer start

Similar Cases

Institute for Economic Justice and Another v Minister of Social Development and Others [2025] ZAGPPHC 29; [2025] 2 All SA 230 (GP); 2025 (4) SA 249 (GP) (23 January 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 29High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Institute for Economic Justice and Another v Minister of Social Development and Others (071891/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 324 (18 March 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 324High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Institute for Economic Justice and Another v Minister of Social Development and Others (071891/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 369 (25 April 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 369High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Financial Sector Conduct Authority v Financial Services Tribunal and Others (009838/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 675; 2025 (6) SA 591 (GP) (9 July 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 675High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)97% similar
Financial Sector Conduct Authority and Others v Deighton (A304/2022; 15703/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 88 (7 February 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 88High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)97% similar

Discussion