Brilliant Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd v Altron TMT (Pty) Ltd and Others (042792/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 713 (14 July 2025)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAGPPHC 713 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Brilliant Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd v Altron TMT (Pty) Ltd and Others (042792/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 713 (14 July 2025) Brilliant Telecommunications (Pty) Ltd v Altron TMT (Pty) Ltd and Others (042792/2023) [2025] ZAGPPHC 713 (14 July 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2025_713.html sino date 14 July 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF3SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO: 042792/2023 (1)      REPORTABLE: NO (2)      OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3)      REVISED. DATE    14/07/2025 LENYAI J In the matter of: BRILLIANT TELECOMMUNICATIONS (PTY) LTD                                  Applicant And ALTRON TMT (PTY) LTD                                                            First Respondent CITY OF TSHWANE METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITY        Second Respondent CBX TECH (PTY) LTD                                                               Third Respondent The judgment and order are published and distributed electronically. The date and time of hand-down is deemed to be 14:00 on 14 July 2025 JUDGMENT LENYAI J 1. This is an application for leave to appeal brought by the applicant against the  judgment and order granted by me on the  7 th April 2025. 2. The test for the granting of leave to appeal pertinent to the present matter is set out in section 17(1) of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 as follows: “ ( 1)   Leave to appeal may only be given where the judge or judges concerned are of the opinion that (a) (i)   the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success or (ii)  there is some other compelling reason why the appeal should be heard, including conflicting judgments on the matter under consideration.” 3. I have considered the grounds upon which the application has been brought and the reasons given by me for the judgment and the order. I have also considered the submissions made by counsel for the granting of leave to appeal on the part of the applicant and those opposing the granting of leave to appeal on behalf of the first respondent. 4. I am not persuaded that another court would come to a different conclusion or that there is some other compelling reason why leave to appeal should be granted. 5. In the circumstances, I make the following order: 5.1 The application for leave to appeal is refused. 5.2 The applicant is ordered to pay the costs of the first respondent on scale C. LENYAI J Judge of the High Court Gauteng Division, Pretoria Appearances Counsel for Applicant:                                    : Adv Ralikhuvhana Instructed by                                                  : Katlego Ralikhuvhana Mokgola Inc Counsel for the First Respondent                  : Adv Prinsloo Instructed by                                                  : Lowndes Dlamini Incorporated Date of hearing                                              : 11 JULY 2025 Date of Judgement                                        : 14 JULY 2025 sino noindex make_database footer start