PEC Metering (Pty) Ltd v Body Corporate of Federal Industrial Park (31013/2018) [2025] ZAGPPHC 995 (15 September 2025)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2025 >> [2025] ZAGPPHC 995 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## PEC Metering (Pty) Ltd v Body Corporate of Federal Industrial Park (31013/2018) [2025] ZAGPPHC 995 (15 September 2025) PEC Metering (Pty) Ltd v Body Corporate of Federal Industrial Park (31013/2018) [2025] ZAGPPHC 995 (15 September 2025) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2025_995.html sino date 15 September 2025 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO.: 31013/2018 (1)    REPORTABLE: NO (2)    OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3)    REVISED: NO Date:  15 September 2025 E van der Schyff In the application for leave to appeal between: PEC METERING (PTY) LTD                                                                                    Applicant and THE BODY CORPORATE OF FEDERAL INDUSTRIAL PARK                         Respondent In re THE BODY CORPORATE OF FEDERAL INDUSTRIAL PARK                                  Plaintiff and PEC METERING (PTY) LTD                                                                                  Defendant JUDGMENT Van der Schyff J Introduction [1] The applicant, the defendant in the trial, launched an application for leave to appeal against the judgment and order handed down on 22 April 2025. [2] The applicant raised several grounds of appeal. These grounds involve the question of an interpretation of the factual evidence and an assessment of the quality of the evidence. Since I handed down a written judgment that contains the reasons for my findings, I am not inclined to repeat the same herein. [3] After considering the grounds of appeal, the pleadings, and the evidence, I am not of the opinion that the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success or that some other compelling reason exists as to why the appeal should be heard. In the result the application for leave to appeal stands to be dismissed with costs on Scale B. ORDER In the result, the following order is granted: 1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs on Scale B. E van der Schyff Judge of the High Court Delivered:  This judgment is handed down electronically by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. For the applicant: Adv. MP Van der Merwe SC Instructed by: Raubenheimers Attorneys Incorporated For the respondent: Adv. W.C. Carstens Instructed by: Otto Krause Inc Attorneys Date of the hearing: 1 September 2025 Date of judgment: 15 September 2025 sino noindex make_database footer start