Case Law[2024] ZAGPPHC 1006South Africa
Plestin v Road Accident Fund (1508/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1006 (23 September 2024)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)
23 September 2024
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
>>
2024
>>
[2024] ZAGPPHC 1006
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Plestin v Road Accident Fund (1508/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1006 (23 September 2024)
Plestin v Road Accident Fund (1508/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1006 (23 September 2024)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2024_1006.html
sino date 23 September 2024
SAFLII
Note:
Certain
personal/private details of parties or witnesses have been
redacted from this document in compliance with the law
and
SAFLII
Policy
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(GAUTENG DIVISION,
PRETORIA)
CASE NO: 1508/2021
(1)
REPORTABLE: NO
(2)
OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
(3)
REVISED: NO
23/09/2024
In the matter between:-
VUSUMZI
PLESTIN
PLAINTIFF
And
THE
ROAD ACCIDENT
FUND
DEFENDANT
JUDGMENT
AMIEN AJ:
Introduction
[1]
This is an action for the recovery of
delictual damages under the
Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996
arising
from personal injuries sustained because of a motor vehicle accident
that occurred on 16 September 2017.
[2]
The Plaintiff claims for future medical
expenses, general damages, past and future loss of earnings and
earning capacity.
[3]
At
the
time of the accident,
the
Plaintiff
was 49
years old. He
is
currently
56
years old.
[4]
The Plaintiff sustained the following
injuries arising from the accident:
4.1.
Axial skeleton injuries.
4.2.
Mild to moderate disc degeneration of the
Plaintiff’s cervical spine and lumbar spine
4.3.
Moderate thoracic spondylosis
4.4.
Moderate lower lumbar facet joint
arthropathy
4.5.
Left 6
th
rib
fracture
[5]
The Plaintiff was taken to hospital for
treatment but was not admitted. He was X-rayed and received
conservative treatment.
[6]
The Plaintiff complains of neck and back
pain, which is exacerbated by activity and cold and severe weather.
He experiences occasional
headaches. The pain is treated with pain
medication and rest.
[7]
The Plaintiff has pain in his chest due to
the fracture of his ribs.
[8]
The Plaintiff also experiences stiffness in
his neck and lower back as well as spasms in the paraspinal and
trapezius muscles. He
has difficulty sitting and standing in one
position for too long. He walks with a mild limp.
[9]
The Plaintiff’s driving is affected
because he now needs to turn his whole body to check the blind spots.
He also cannot drive
long distances anymore.
[10]
The Plaintiff suffers ‘pins and
needles’ and numbness in his lower left limb.
[11]
The Plaintiff completed grade 6 and
obtained a code C1 driving licence.
[12]
Prior to the accident, the Plaintiff was a
self-employed driver where he did delivery loads, including the
delivery of furniture.
He also did gardening jobs in a piece job
capacity.
[13]
Due to the back pain that he now suffers
and difficulty in standing for too long, gardening work is a
challenge for the Plaintiff.
He also has difficulty lifting furniture
for delivery. He therefore handed over the delivery driving to his
son and earned about
R1 500.00 as his share of the earnings from
November 2017 to December 2019 and has not earned any work-related
income since then.
[14]
The Plaintiff may only do sedentary ‘light
duty’ type work, but he is not skilled sufficiently for this.
[15]
Given the Plaintiff’s age, limited
level of education, and high unemployment rate in the open market, it
will be difficult
for him to find suitable employment.
[16]
Prior to the accident, the Plaintiff had a
combined income of about R3 560.00 per month for his delivery and
gardening work.
[17]
After the accident, the Plaintiff was off
work for six (6) weeks, during which time he was not remunerated.
[18]
It is also noted that the Plaintiff is
diabetic.
[19]
For future purposes, the Plaintiff may
require surgery.
[20]
It appears that the Defendant accepts that
the insured driver was 100% negligent. Consequently, the merits are
100% in favour of
the Plaintiff.
[21]
Past loss of earnings comprises pre- and
post-morbid past loss of earnings, which is calculated as R42 720.00
– R37 500.00
= R5 220.00). Future loss of earnings relates only
to pre-morbid loss of earnings, which is R299 040.00. The total loss
of earnings
subject to nil contingencies is therefore R304 260.00.
[22]
The Plaintiff is also entitled to fair and
adequate general damages for pain and suffering in the amount of R400
000.00.
[23]
Since the Plaintiff may have to undergo
surgery in the future, he is entitled to an Undertaking in terms of
section 17(4)(a)
of the
Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996
, to be
compensated by the Defendant for the cost of future accommodation in
medical care facilities.
[24]
In the result, the following order is made:
24.1.
The Defendant is declared liable for
payment of 100% of the Plaintiff’s agreed or proven damages in
consequence of the injuries
sustained resulting from the motor
vehicle collision which took place on 16 September 2017 in which the
Plaintiff was involved.
24.2.
The Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff
the sum of R704 260.00 in full and final settlement of the
Plaintiff’s claim, which
amount shall be paid within 180 days
to the credit of the trust account of the Plaintiff’s Attorneys
of record, Wim Krynauw,
whose trust account details are as follows:
Name of bank:
ABSA Bank
Account number:
4[...]
Branch code:
6[...]
Branch:
Krugersdorp
Reference:
T[...]
24.3.
The above amount is calculated as follows:
Loss of Earnings -
R304 260.00
General Damages –
R400 000.00
24.4.
The Defendant will not be liable for any
interest on the said payment provided payment is made timeously.
24.5.
In the event of the default of the
Defendant, interest will be payable on the full amount owing at that
time at the rate of 11.75%
interest per annum, calculated from the
15
th
day
after the date of this order to the date of payment.
24.6.
The Defendant is ordered to furnish the
Plaintiff with an Undertaking in terms of
section 17(4)(a)
of the
Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996
, to compensate the Plaintiff for
the cost of future accommodation in a hospital or nursing home or
treatment of or rendering of
a service or supplying of goods to the
Plaintiff resulting from injuries sustained by her as a result of an
accident that occurred
on 16 September 2017, after such costs have
been incurred and upon proof thereof.
24.7.
The Defendant is to pay the costs of the
Rule 38(2)
expert reports.
24.8.
The Defendant is to pay the Plaintiff’s
taxed or agreed party and party costs on a High Court scale B,
including the costs
up to and including 8 August 2024, which costs
are subject to the Taxing Master’s discretion.
24.9.
Should the parties not be able to agree on
the amount of the legal costs’ payable by the Defendant, the
Plaintiff shall serve
a Notice of Taxation on the Defendant’s
attorneys.
24.10.
The Plaintiff shall allow the Defendant 180
court days to make payment of the costs so taxed.
24.11.
Should the Defendant default, interest will
be payable on the full amount owing at that time at the rate of
11.75% interest
per annum
calculated
from the 15
th
day
up to and including the date of payment.
24.12.
Counsel for Plaintiff confirms that a
contingency fee agreement was concluded between the Plaintiff and her
Attorneys, and that
such agreement complies with the Provisions of
the Contingency Fee Act.
W AMIEN
ACTING JUDGE OF THE
HIGH COURT
PRETORIA
APPEARANCES:
Counsel
for the Plaintiff:
L
Whittle
Instructed
by:
Wim
Krynauw Attorneys
Counsel
for the Defendant:
K
Phokwane
Instructed
by:
State
Attorney
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Moremedi v Road Accident Fund (86838/19) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1338 (18 December 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 1338High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
L.L obo K v Road Accident Fund (88449/16) [2024] ZAGPPHC 78 (31 January 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 78High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Setshogo v Road Accident Fund (44487/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 388 (24 April 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 388High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Mathopa v Road Accident Fund (61319/2020; 4549/22) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1810 (16 October 2023)
[2023] ZAGPPHC 1810High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Mphuthi v Road Accident Fund (34766/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1205 (20 November 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 1205High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar