de Lange and Another v de Klerk (49408/2020) [2023] ZAGPPHC 620 (2 August 2023)

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2023 >> [2023] ZAGPPHC 620 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## de Lange and Another v de Klerk (49408/2020) [2023] ZAGPPHC 620 (2 August 2023) de Lange and Another v de Klerk (49408/2020) [2023] ZAGPPHC 620 (2 August 2023) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2023_620.html sino date 2 August 2023 REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO:49408/2020 (1)           REPORTABLE: YES/NO (2)           OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO (3)           REVISED: NO Date: 2 August 2023 E van der Schyff In the matter between: LEON MARTHINUS DE LANGE                         FIRST APPLICANT ALIDAFORCE (PTY) LTD                                    SECOND APPLICANT and HELIA ALETTA DE KLERK                                 RESPONDENT JUDGMENT Van der Schyff J [1] This is an application for leave to appeal against the judgment and order handed down on 2 May 2023. [2] Section 17 of the Superior Courts Act 10 of 2013 prescribes that leave to appeal may only be given if this court is of the opinion that the appeal would have a reasonable prospect of success or there is some other compelling reason. [3] I have considered the grounds upon which the application for leave to appeal has been brought and the arguments advanced by counsel. I also considered the reasons for granting the order that I did on 2 May 2023. I am of the view that there is neither a prospect of another court coming to a different conclusion nor any compelling reason that merits the granting of leave to appeal. ORDER In the result, the following order is granted: 1. The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs. ____________________________ E van der Schyff Judge of the High Court Delivered:  This judgement is handed down electronically by uploading it to the electronic file of this matter on CaseLines. As a courtesy gesture, it will be sent to the parties/their legal representatives by email. For the applicants:        Adv. A.S.L. Van Wyk Instructed by:                DIXON ATTORNEYS For the respondent:        Adv. H.P. West Instructed by:                  O’DONOHUE & MARAIS ATTORNEYS Date of the hearing:        26 June 2023 Date of judgment:           2 August 2023 sino noindex make_database footer start