Case Law[2023] ZAGPPHC 1110South Africa
Manala v Minister of Police and Others (Leave to Appeal) (13342/2013) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1110 (4 September 2023)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)
4 September 2023
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
>>
2023
>>
[2023] ZAGPPHC 1110
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Manala v Minister of Police and Others (Leave to Appeal) (13342/2013) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1110 (4 September 2023)
Manala v Minister of Police and Others (Leave to Appeal) (13342/2013) [2023] ZAGPPHC 1110 (4 September 2023)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2023_1110.html
sino date 4 September 2023
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(GAUTENG
DIVISION, PRETORIA)
Case
Number: 13342/2013
(1)
REPORTABLE: YES /
NO.
(2)
OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: YES /
NO.
(3)
REVISED. YES
DATE:
4/9/2023
SIGNATURE
In
the matter between:
ANDRE
TSELEDI MANALA
Applicant
and
MINISTER
OF
POLICE
First Respondent
CAPTAIN
G T
HOYS
Second Respondent
CAPTAIN
JOSEPH MASHABANE
Third
Respondent
CONSTABLE
A PLAATJIE
Fourth Respondent
JUDGMENT:
APPLICATION FOR LEAVE TO APPEAL
POTTERILL
J
[1]
I read the grounds of appeal, listened and considered the arguments
and I am satisfied
that no other court would reasonably come to
another conclusion.
[2]
As for the past medical expenses the record will reflect that the
plaintiff put no
evidence before the court for this claim and it was
accordingly not proven and there was no claim to determine.
[3]
The ground of appeal against the past loss of income is troubling as
the counsel for
the plaintiff on record abandoned this claim.
[4]
I accordingly make the following order:
The application for leave
to appeal is dismissed with costs.
S.
POTTERILL
JUDGE
OF THE HIGH COURT
CASE NO:
13342/2013
HEARD ON:
1 September 2023
FOR THE PLAINTIFF:
ADV. M.R. MAPHUTHA
INSTRUCTED BY:
Makhafola &
Verster Incorporated
FOR THE DEFENDANTS:
ADV. J.C. VAN EEDEN
INSTRUCTED BY:
Gildenhuys Malatji
Incorporated
DATE OF JUDGMENT:
4 September 2023
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
Manamela v National Commissioner South African Police Service and Others [2023] ZAGPPHC 202; 020531/2023 (23 March 2023)
[2023] ZAGPPHC 202High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Manamela v National Commissioner, South African Police Service and Others (2024-096651) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1034 (11 October 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 1034High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Dladla v Manana and Others (2023/125417) [2026] ZAGPPHC 1 (5 January 2026)
[2026] ZAGPPHC 1High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Matlala v Minister of Police (49653/2021) [2024] ZAGPPHC 218 (13 March 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 218High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Mokete v Minister Of Safety And Security [2023] ZAGPPHC 229; 36727/2008 (29 March 2023)
[2023] ZAGPPHC 229High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar