africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2022] ZAGPPHC 529South Africa

Kuduskop Estate (Pty) Ltd and Others v Venter (75594/2013) [2022] ZAGPPHC 529 (18 July 2022)

High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)
18 July 2022
OTHER J, DAVIS J, Respondent J

Judgment

begin wrapper begin container begin header begin slogan-floater end slogan-floater - About SAFLII About SAFLII - Databases Databases - Search Search - Terms of Use Terms of Use - RSS Feeds RSS Feeds end header begin main begin center # South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria You are here: SAFLII >> Databases >> South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria >> 2022 >> [2022] ZAGPPHC 529 | Noteup | LawCite sino index ## Kuduskop Estate (Pty) Ltd and Others v Venter (75594/2013) [2022] ZAGPPHC 529 (18 July 2022) Kuduskop Estate (Pty) Ltd and Others v Venter (75594/2013) [2022] ZAGPPHC 529 (18 July 2022) Download original files PDF format RTF format make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2022_529.html sino date 18 July 2022 # IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA IN THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA CASE NO :75594/2013 DATE :  2022-05-27 REPORTABLE:  NO. OF INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES:  NO. REVISED. YES 18 JULY 2022 In the matter between KUDUSKOP ESTATE (PTY) LTD + 7 OTHERS                 Applicant and JAN ADRIAAN VENTER                                                    Respondent JUDGMENT DAVIS J In view of the uncontroverted evidence of the plaintiff, I find that there is no reasonable prospect that another Court would find that the plaintiff’s delay in rendering his account was unreasonable, or that there are other grounds on which the special plea should have been upheld.  The order is then that the application for Leave to Appeal is refused with costs. MR VENTER :  May it please Your Lordship. MS SCHOEMAN :  May it please you, M'Lord. COURT :  Court will adjourn. COURT ADJOURNS DAVIS J JUDGE OF THE HIGH COURT GAUTENG DIVISION, PRETORIA DATE SIGNED : 18 JULY 2022 sino noindex make_database footer start

Similar Cases

Estate D'Afrique Master Owners Association NPC and Others v Christian Grosch Airboat Africa t/a Airboat Africa @ Harties (23 September 2024) (27875/2022) [2024] ZAGPPHC 938 (23 September 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 938High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Venter v Kuduskop Estate (Pty) Ltd and Others (75594/2013) [2022] ZAGPPHC 295 (14 April 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 295High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Erf 23 Magaliesig CC v Firstrand Bank Limited and Another (39085/2016) [2022] ZAGPPHC 303 (29 April 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 303High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Kukard N.O and Others v ABSA Bank Limited and Others (115284/2023) [2024] ZAGPPHC 1089 (23 October 2024)
[2024] ZAGPPHC 1089High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar
Acire Property Holdings (Pty) Ltd v Banzi Trade 31 (Pty) Ltd t/a Brickit (38683/2022) [2022] ZAGPPHC 764 (30 September 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 764High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)98% similar

Discussion