Case Law[2022] ZAGPPHC 869South Africa
Absa Trust Ltd N.O obo FX Mbenze Trust v Road Accident Fund (30152/2021) [2022] ZAGPPHC 869 (16 November 2022)
High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)
16 November 2022
Judgment
begin wrapper
begin container
begin header
begin slogan-floater
end slogan-floater
- About SAFLII
About SAFLII
- Databases
Databases
- Search
Search
- Terms of Use
Terms of Use
- RSS Feeds
RSS Feeds
end header
begin main
begin center
# South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
You are here:
SAFLII
>>
Databases
>>
South Africa: North Gauteng High Court, Pretoria
>>
2022
>>
[2022] ZAGPPHC 869
|
Noteup
|
LawCite
sino index
## Absa Trust Ltd N.O obo FX Mbenze Trust v Road Accident Fund (30152/2021) [2022] ZAGPPHC 869 (16 November 2022)
Absa Trust Ltd N.O obo FX Mbenze Trust v Road Accident Fund (30152/2021) [2022] ZAGPPHC 869 (16 November 2022)
Download original files
PDF format
RTF format
make_database: source=/home/saflii//raw/ZAGPPHC/Data/2022_869.html
sino date 16 November 2022
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
GAUTENG
LOCAL DIVISION, PRETORIA
Case
no: 30152/2021
REPORTABLE:
NO
OF
INTEREST TO OTHER JUDGES: NO
REVISED.
16
November 2022
In
the matter between:
ABSA
TRUST LTD N.O. OBO
FX
MBENZE TRUST
APPLICANT
and
ROAD
ACCIDENT FUND
RESPONDENT
JUDGMENT
KHWINANA
AJ
INTRODUCTION
[1]
This is an application for costs incurred by the trust in respect of
the bond of security
for the period 2020 – 2021 and annual
trust administration fees for the period 2012-2020 incurred in terms
of section 17(4)
(a) undertaking certificate read with paragraph 3 of
the court order dated 15 December 2016.
[2]
That interest at a rate of 7% per annum be paid until date of payment
and costs at
attorney and client scale.
[3]
The issue to be determined is whether the applicant is entitled to
costs as the court
order does not specify costs.
BACKGROUND
[4]
The Beneficiary was involved in a motor collision on this the 23
rd
day of January 2012 wherein the beneficiary incurred serious injuries
and action was instituted for compensation. The matter was
finalised
on the 15
th
day of December 2016 with the following
orders:
1.The defendant is to pay
the plaintiff the capital amount of R 5 384 5050.00 within three
months of this order.
2.The net proceeds of the
payments referred to herein as well as the Plaintiff’s taxed or
agreed party and party costs payable
by the Defendant, after
deduction of the Plaintiff’s attorney legal costs (the capital
amount) shall be payable to a Trust,
to be established within two
months of the date of this order.
3. The Defendant is to
provide the Plaintiff with a written undertaking in terms of
section
17
(4) (a) of the
Road Accident Fund Act 56 of 1996
.
4. The Plaintiff’s
attorneys of record (Thomas Mohole Attorneys) shall attend to the
creation of an inter vivos trust in order
to protect the awarded
funds for the exclusive benefit of the claimant.
5. The Plaintiff’s
attorneys (Thomas Mohole Attorneys) shall keep the monies received as
referred to in clause 1 of this order
in an interest-bearing trust
account for the benefit of the claimant and shall pay over such
monies to the trustee of the trust
to be created in terms of clause 4
of this order, immediately once the Master of High Court has issued
the trustee with the necessary
letters of authority.
6. The defendant is to
pay the Plaintiff’s taxed or agreed party and party costs
shall, inter alia, include:-
6.1 the costs consequent
upon the obtaining of all medico-legal reports of the Plaintiff’s
experts, namely:-
Dr Shamley (Neurologist)
Ms N Doorsasamy
(Occupational Therapist)
Ms M Adam
(Neuropsychologist)
Dr AC Strydom (Industrial
Psychologist)
Dr A Mazwai
(Neurosurgeon)
Mr Ivan Kramer CC
(Actuaries)
6.2
The reasonable and necessary
preparation, qualifying and reservation fees, which will inter alia,
include the fees in respect of meetings between the Plaintiff’s
attorneys and the abovementioned experts, excluding the experts,
excluding the expert mentioned in paragraph 6.1 above:
6.3
The costs of appointment of the
curator ad litem;
6.4
The reasonable fees of the curator ad litem.
[5]
A deed of trust was issued which the applicant submits obliges the
Respondent to pay
the costs of the trustee to render services or
supply goods to the beneficiary arising out of the injuries sustained
as well as
the costs necessary to establish the trust. It is also for
costs of the bond of security for the period 2020 – 2021 and
annual
trust administration fees for the period 2019 to 2020 the
invoices being R 92 473.08.
[6]
The costs for the trust are R 30 963.75 for the period 2020 –
2021 and
the costs for the administration of the trust are recorded
as R 61 509.99. A letter of demand was sent to the Respondent on
the 27
th
day of December 2020 after the claims had been
lodged without response on the 26
th
day of November 2020.
The Respondent had not paid the Applicant as of the date of the
hearing of this matter.
[7]
The applicant is applying for a punitive costs order due to the
Respondent’s
failure to comply with the court order and has now
forced the trust to litigate.
LEGAL
MATRIX
[8]
Section 17(4)
(a) of the
Road Accident Fund, Act 56 of 1996
provides
that: "Where a claim for compensation under sub-section (1)- (a)
includes a claim for the costs of the future accommodation
of any
person in hospital or nursing home or treatment of or rendering of a
service or supplying of goods to him or her the fund
or an agent
shall be entitled, after furnishing the third party concerned with an
undertaking to that effect or a competent court
has directed the fund
or the agent to furnish such undertaking to compensate - (i)
the third party in respect of the said
costs after the costs have
been incurred and on proof thereof or (ii) the provider of such
service or treatment directly, notwithstanding
Section '19(c) or (d),
in accordance with the tariff contemplated in sub-section (4)(b)".
[9]
The deed of trust at paragraph 8.2 states as follows that:
REMUNERATION
8.1
The trustee shall be entitled to the costs of the creation of the
trust, the appointment of a trustee and
the trustee’s costs in
administration of the Estates Act, no. 66 of 1965, as amended,
limited to the prescribed tariff applicable
to a curator bonis, as
reflected in Government Notice R 1602 of July 1991, specifically
paragraph 3(a) and (b) of the Schedule
thereto and in Section 77 of
the Administration of Estates Act.
8.2
The trustee(s) shall be authorised to recover the remuneration of,
and costs incurred by the trustee(s), in
administering the
undertaking in terms of section 17(4) of the Act 56 of 1996 in
accordance with the certificate of undertaking
to be provided by the
Road Accident Fund.
REGISTRATION
OF THE TRUST
9.
The trustee undertakes to register this trust deed at the office of
the Master
of the High Court under the Trust Property Control Act
1988 as amended and shall be entitled in settle the costs payable in
respect
of such registration, out of the income and if necessary out
of the capital trust. The costs thereof shall be recoverable in terms
of Section 17(4) (a) of Act 56 of 1996 in accordance with the
certificate of undertaking to be provided by the Road Accident Fund.
ANALYSIS
[10]
The deed of trust was made a court order which is clear and concise
in so far as the costs. The
costs for the creation of a trust shall
be paid by the Respondent under
section 17(4)(a)
of the
Road Accident
Fund Act 56 of 1996
.
[11]
The administration of the trust is payable from the undertaking
certificate provided for by the
Respondent as alluded to supra at 8.2
of the deed of trust. The costs incurred have been agreed upon and
those of the bond are
consequent to the establishment of the trust.
[12]
I must say I agree that the victims of Road Accident Fund matters
must not be put out of pocket
considering that the fund that has been
paid over to them are in relation to injuries sustained. Counsel for
the Applicant has
referred me to the matter by Yende AJ
[1]
wherein he says “'rendering of service or supplying of goods'
cannot be confined only to the admitted liability of the Road
Accident Fund for 'rendering of services' the provision of which is
regulated by a tariff promulgated in terms of the National
Health
Act. As mentioned above the words 'rendering of service' is and/or
wide enough to include the rendering of service by a
domestic
assistant, a curatrix bonis and the establishment and administration
of the trust on behalf of the road accident victims.
Thus expenses
incurred as the consequent thereof are claimable in terms of the
Section 17 (4)(a) Undertaking Certificate issued
by the Road Accident
Fund and such expenses should be reasonable in the circumstances.
[13]
I acquiescence with what has been said in the matter of Rabie,
however, the matter before me
differs in that the deed of trust
succinctly alluded to the costs, and that same falls within the ambit
of section 17(4) (a) and
that the Respondent must pay the said costs.
COSTS
[14]
I have also considered what has been stated by the counsel for the
applicant that the Respondent
forces the Applicant to litigate in
order to enforce the benefits and rights of the undertaking
certificate which does not only
constitute a financial loss for the
Trust but also a total disregard for a court order.
[15]
The Respondent has indeed disregarded the court order and ignored the
Applicant. As of the date
of the hearing the Respondent had not paid
nor engaged the Applicant. This court frowns at the conduct of the
Respondent which
seriously prejudices the victims of road accidents.
I have therefore considered the manner in which the matter has been
handled
and I am persuaded to agree with the Applicant that a
punitive cost order is appropriate under the circumstances.
In
the result I make the following order:-
1.
That the Respondent shall pay the Applicant the sum of R 92 473.08;
2.
Interest at 7% per annum
3.
Costs of application at attorney and client scale
E.N.B.
KHWINANA
ACTING
JUDGE OF GAUTENG DIVISION,
PRETORIA
Counsel
for Applicant: Attorney
K.E Modiba
Attorneys
for Applicant: VZLR
INC
Date
of Hearing: 9
th
September 2022
Date
of Judgment: 16
November 2022
IN
THE HIGH COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA
(GAUTENG
DIVISION, PRETORIA)
Case
No: 30152 / 2021
BEFORE
THE HONOURABLE JUSTICE KHWINANA AJ
On
the 12 September 2022 Court 4F
16/11/2022
Roll
No. 9
In
the matter between:
ABSA
TRUST LTD N.O FX MBENZE
TRUST APPLICANT
And
THE
ROAD ACCIDENT
FUND RESPONDENT
This
Order is made an Order of Court by the Judge whose name is reflected
herein, duly stamped by the Registrar of the Court, and
is submitted
electronically to the Parties/their legal representatives by email.
This Order is further uploaded to the electronic
file of this matter
on Case Lines by the Judge or his/her secretary. The date of this
order is deemed to be 12 SEPTEMBER 2022.
DRAFT
ORDER
After
considering submission made by Counsel on behalf of the Applicant and
reading the papers filed on record an order is granted
in the
following terms: 0
1.
That the Respondent makes payment of R 92 473.08 to the Applicant for
costs incurred by the Trust in respect of the bond of security
for
period 2020 – 2021and annual trust administration fees for
period 2019 - 2020, incurred in terms of the Applicant’s
Section 17(4)(a) undertaking certificate read with paragraph 3 of the
court order dated 15 December 2016, within 10 (TEN) days
from date of
service of this order.
2.
Cost of the Application on an attorney and client scale.
BY
ORDER
For
the Applicant: Mr.
KE Modiba
An
attorney with right of appearance appearing as counsel for the
Applicant
076
745 0315 /
admin@kmodibaattorneys.co.za
Attorneys
for Applicant: VZLR INC
B
Singh bhavna@vzlr.co.za / 012 345 9444
For
the Respondent:
Unrepresented
[1]
Rabie N.O obo TA Olifant Trust v RAF 40543/2019 [2021 ZAGPPHC 312
(13 May 2021)
sino noindex
make_database footer start
Similar Cases
ABSA Trust Ltd N.O ET Kabinde Trust v Road Accident Fund (58660/2021) [2022] ZAGPPHC 258 (29 April 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 258High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)100% similar
Absa Bank Limited v Motsepe (25761/2021) [2022] ZAGPPHC 900 (22 November 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 900High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Absa Bank Limited v Bjorkman (40848/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 896 (7 November 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 896High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Absa Bank Limited v Sirovha (45290/21) [2022] ZAGPPHC 599 (15 August 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 599High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar
Absa Bank Limited v Mosomane and Others (37737/2020) [2022] ZAGPPHC 23 (18 January 2022)
[2022] ZAGPPHC 23High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)99% similar