Case Law[2026] KEHC 1439Kenya
Murethi alias Jeff v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Case E008 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1439 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Ruling)
High Court of Kenya
Judgment
REPUBLIC OF KENYA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT ISIOLO
MISCELLANEOUS CRIMINAL CASE NO. E 008 OF
2025
GEOFFREY MURETHI alias
JEFF......................................APPLICANT
VERSUS
REPUBLIC .............................................................
.......................ACCUSED
RULING
1.The Applicant’s Notice of Motion dated 25/9/2025,
seeks for revision of sentence. The Application is
premised on Section 333 (2) of the Criminal
Procedure Code (CPC) and Article 165(6) of the
Constitution.
2.The Applicant prays that the period he spent in
custody prior to conviction be considered, in
determining the appropriate sentence which he
ought to serve. He states that as at the date of his
conviction, he had spent two years, four months and
one week in custody. He further states that when he
appealed to the High Court the sentence of 30 years
which had been imposed on him was upheld.
3.The Applicant’s Affidavit in support is silent on
whether he sought for review of his sentence in his
Appeal before the High Court. I have also perused
the Judgment of the high Court, (Meru H/C Criminal
1 | P a ge
Appeal No. 78 & 79 of 2019). The Judgment is
silent on the sentence. I will therefore, treat this
issue not to have been taken up on Appeal and
hence was never addressed by the High Court.
4.A reading of the Judgment delivered on 10/5/2019 by
the Chief Magistrate at Isiolo is also silent on whether
the court took into consideration the period the
Applicant had spent in custody when it meted out
the sentence. I will treat the silence to mean it was
never considered. The prayer for review is therefore
warranted
5.A further perusal of the record shows that the
Applicant was arrested on 31/12/2016 and remained
in custody throughout trial. He was sentenced on
10.05.2019. Thus, in terms of section 333(2) of the
criminal procedure code the Applicant’s sentence
should have been discounted by the said period.
6.The Application succeeds and consequently the
sentence of 30 years is varied to the extent that it is
deemed to have taken effect from 31st December,
2016.
Dated, Signed and delivered at Isiolo, this 12th day of
February, 2026
S. Chirchir
Judge
In the presence of:-
Roba/Kalelo-Court Assistant
2 | P a ge
Similar Cases
Obiye v Republic (Miscellaneous Application E087 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1454 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1454High Court of Kenya81% similar
Keya v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E164 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1441 (KLR) (11 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1441High Court of Kenya79% similar
Enos v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E024 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1188 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1188High Court of Kenya76% similar
Mochifefe v S (CC48/2021) [2025] ZAGPPHC 918 (19 August 2025)
[2025] ZAGPPHC 918High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Pretoria)69% similar
Asangbeng v The Minister of Home Affairs and Others (40516/2021) [2022] ZAGPJHC 293 (21 April 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 293High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)68% similar