africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2026] KEHC 1188Kenya

Enos v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E024 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1188 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Ruling)

High Court of Kenya

Judgment

REPUBLIC OF KENYA IN THE HIGH COURT OF KENYA AT GARSEN MISC. CR. APPL. NO. E024 OF 2025 BRIGHTON HOSEA ENOS …………………..…….…..APPLICANT VERSUS REPUBLIC…………………………………………..……RESPONDENT RULING 1. The Applicant has filed an undated application seeking that the period spent in custody be computed in the sentence meted on him in accordance with the provisions of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code that requires that the court when sentencing an accused person who has been in custody during trial to take into account the period spent in custody. 2. I have called for and perused the original file in Garsen Sexual Offences Case No. 12 of 2018 wherein the applicant was tried and convicted for the offence of incest contrary to Section 20(1) of the Sexual Offences Act and was on 13th March 2019 sentenced to serve 15 years imprisonment. The court record indicates that the Applicant was arraigned in court on 3rd July 2018 and was in custody throughout the trial. The trial court never indicated when sentencing the Applicant that it had taken into account the period of 7 months that he was in custody before he was sentenced. 3. I have also perused the judgment in the Applicant’s appeal to the High Court in Garsen Criminal Appeal No.50 of Gsn Misc. Cr. App. E024 of 2025 Ruling Page | 1 2019. The issue of the time spent in custody was not raised and wasn’t considered by the High Court. 4. In view of the provision of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code, I find the application herein to be merited as the time spent in custody was not taken into account by the trial court when the Applicant was sentenced. The provisions of Section 333(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code are mandatory. I therefore order that the sentence meted on the Applicant in Garsen Sexual Offices Case No. 12 of 2018 commences from the time the Applicant, Brighton Hosea Enos, was arraigned in court, that is on 3rd July 2018. It is so ordered. Delivered, dated and signed at GARSEN this 10th day of February, 2026. J. N. NJAGI JUDGE In the presence of: Mr. Oluoch for Respondent Applicant present virtually at GK prison Manyani Court Assistant - Jumaa Gsn Misc. Cr. App. E024 of 2025 Ruling Page | 2

Similar Cases

Obiye v Republic (Miscellaneous Application E087 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1454 (KLR) (10 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1454High Court of Kenya82% similar
Keya v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Application E164 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1441 (KLR) (11 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1441High Court of Kenya77% similar
Murethi alias Jeff v Republic (Miscellaneous Criminal Case E008 of 2025) [2026] KEHC 1439 (KLR) (12 February 2026) (Ruling)
[2026] KEHC 1439High Court of Kenya76% similar
Anaye v Jaskolka and Others (133375/2023) [2025] ZAGPJHC 321 (24 March 2025)
[2025] ZAGPJHC 321High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)67% similar
Asangbeng v The Minister of Home Affairs and Others (40516/2021) [2022] ZAGPJHC 293 (21 April 2022)
[2022] ZAGPJHC 293High Court of South Africa (Gauteng Division, Johannesburg)66% similar

Discussion