africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case LawGhana

Dei-Alorso Vrs, Gaitu (E7/01/2023) [2024] GHAHC 328 (13 June 2024)

High Court of Ghana
13 June 2024

Judgment

INTHESUPERIOR COURT OF JUDICATURE INTHEHIGH COURT OF JUSTICE, HO (COURT ‘1’)HELDONTHURSDAY 13TH JUNE2024BEFORE JUSTICEJOHN EKOW MENSAH. SUITNO. E7/01/2023 HERODEI-ALORSE BK210,Solfa Avenue PLAINTIFF MountZion-AnajiWest, Takoradi. VERSUS DR. ABRAHAM GAITU VH-0190-7776 NearVAG Hall-offAccra-Ho Road DEFENDANT SokodeLokoe RULING At the trial, Plaintiff’s Counsel raised objections to Defendant’s Exhibits 2 and 3 on the grounds that Exhibit 2 is a Whatsapp conversation and per the decision on A2Z Infraservices Ltd. vs. Quippo Infrastructure Ltd., Whatsapp conversations must be admitted into evidence with care since anything at all can be posted and removed on socialmedia. In respect of Defendant’s Exhibit 3, Plaintiff’s Counsel objects to same on the grounds that the documents are cumulative and per section 52 (a) & (b), such documents areinadmissible intoevidence. 1|Page In response, Defence Counsel says Exhibit 2 is a Whatsapp Message between the parties and its contents are based on the Defendant’s assertion that Defendant paid some monies to the Plaintiff, a claim that is founded on Defendant’s Statement of Claim. In respect of Exhibit 3, Defence Counsel submitted that the documents are not cumulative or repetitive and that its contents are also rooted in Defendant’s pleadings. BYCOURT: Upon hearing both Counsel in the suit, this Court can find that the documents Defendant seeks to tender in evidence are deeply rooted in the pleadings of the Defendant. In fact, Defendant’s Exhibit 2 and Exhibit 3have their basis in Defendant’s StatementofDefence. Again, this Court finds the said Exhibits very material to the case of the Defendant and there is no doubt about their relevance in helping the Courtto determine the issuesat hand. In view of these findings, the Court will overrule the objections and admit Defendant’sExhibit 2and 3intoevidence. They arelabelled Exhibit 2and Exhibit 3forthe Defendant. (Sgd.)John EkowMensah, J. HighCourtOne (1), Ho. 2|Page Lawyers: - Kweku Attakora Dwimoh with Addai Mintah Emmanuel for Dr. Issidore Tuffourfor thePlaintiff. - InnocentBobbie forSenanuAfagbe for theDefendant. vmo* 3|Page

Similar Cases

Dzotefe Vrs. Agbeko (E7/01/2022) [2024] GHAHC 318 (3 July 2024)
High Court of Ghana83% similar
Dzotepe Vrs. Agbeko (E7/01/2022) [2024] GHAHC 306 (3 July 2024)
High Court of Ghana83% similar
Dzide And 2 Others Vrs, Ghana Private Road Transport And 5 Others (E1/17/2013) [2024] GHAHC 326 (18 July 2024)
High Court of Ghana81% similar
Low Price Master Limited Vrs. Akpitse (E12/06/2023) [2024] GHAHC 325 (22 July 2024)
High Court of Ghana81% similar
Mohammed v Ashalle and Others (TRS/E1/HCKO/175/2024) [2025] GHAHC 154 (21 February 2025)
High Court of Ghana80% similar

Discussion