africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2019] ZWMTHC 1Zimbabwe

S v Pfumbwa (CRB 42 of 2019; HMT 1 of 2020) [2019] ZWMTHC 1 (26 November 2019)

High Court of Zimbabwe (Mutare)
26 November 2019
Home J, Journals J, Muzenda J

Headnotes

Academic papers

Judgment

2 HMT 1-20 CRB 42/19 STATE versus GEORGE PFUMBWA HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE MUZENDA J MUTARE, 26 November 2019 Criminal Trial (Section 29. Mental Health Act [Chapter 15:12]) ASSESSORS: 1. Mr Magorokosho 2. Mr Raja M Musarurwa, for the State B Majamanda, for the Accused MUZENDA J: The accused was charged with the crime of Murder as defined in s 47 (1) (a) or (b) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, [Chapter 9:23] and the state alleged that during the period between 18 and 19 August 2018 and at Plot 47, Zunidza Ressettlement, Nyazura, the accused unlawfully caused the death of Patricia Makoni by assaulting her all over the body using an unidentified object intending to kill her, or realising that there was a real risk or possibility that his conduct might cause death and continued to engage in that conduct despite the risk or possibility resulting in injuries from which the said Patricia Makoni died. The accused admitted to causing deceased’s death but qualified his admission by stating that he was mentally challenged when he committed the offence. We hence entered a plea of Not Guilty to the charge of murder. The state and the defence produced a statement of agreed facts which was admitted by this court and marked Annexure “A”. According to the statement of agreed facts, accused is a male adult who resides at Plot 47 Zunidza Resettlement Area, Chief Makoni, Nyazura. The deceased, Patricia Makoni, was a female adult who resided at the same address with that of the accused, she was accused’s wife. During the period between18 and 19 August 2018, at the said Plot 47 Zunidza Resettlement Area, the accused assaulted the deceased all over the body using an identified object. The deceased died on the spot. On 23 August 2018 Dr. Aisa Serrano Gomez carried not a post mortem examination of the deceased’s body and concluded that the cause of death was due to: hypovolemic shock severe haematoma in both thighs and multiple injuries and contusions. At the time of the commission of the offence, the accused was mentally disordered and unable to control himself, such that he lacked criminal responsibility. Dr. P. Mavunganidze a psychiatrist formulated the expert opinion that the accused was mentally challenged at the time of the alleged offence, and further pointed out that accused is now fit to stand trial. The state proceeded to produce the following exhibits by consent of the defence. The psychiatrist report, exh 1Post-mortem report exh 2. Having looked at the evidence led and exhibits produced by the state, and further looking at the statement of agreed facts we are of the agreed view that this is a suitable case for the return of a special verdict to the effect that the accused is not guilty by reason of insanity as contemplated in s 29 (2) of the Mental Health Act [Chapter 15:12]. Accordingly the following order is returned: In terms of s 29 (2) (a) of the Mental Health Act, [Chapter 15:02] the accused person is committed to Chikurubi Psychiatric Unit, until he is discharged by a competent authority. National Prosecuting Authority, state’s legal practitioners Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights, accused’s legal practitioners 2 HMT 1-20 CRB 42/19 2 HMT 1-20 CRB 42/19 STATE versus GEORGE PFUMBWA HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE MUZENDA J MUTARE, 26 November 2019 Criminal Trial (Section 29. Mental Health Act [Chapter 15:12]) ASSESSORS: 1. Mr Magorokosho 2. Mr Raja M Musarurwa, for the State B Majamanda, for the Accused MUZENDA J: The accused was charged with the crime of Murder as defined in s 47 (1) (a) or (b) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act, [Chapter 9:23] and the state alleged that during the period between 18 and 19 August 2018 and at Plot 47, Zunidza Ressettlement, Nyazura, the accused unlawfully caused the death of Patricia Makoni by assaulting her all over the body using an unidentified object intending to kill her, or realising that there was a real risk or possibility that his conduct might cause death and continued to engage in that conduct despite the risk or possibility resulting in injuries from which the said Patricia Makoni died. The accused admitted to causing deceased’s death but qualified his admission by stating that he was mentally challenged when he committed the offence. We hence entered a plea of Not Guilty to the charge of murder. The state and the defence produced a statement of agreed facts which was admitted by this court and marked Annexure “A”. According to the statement of agreed facts, accused is a male adult who resides at Plot 47 Zunidza Resettlement Area, Chief Makoni, Nyazura. The deceased, Patricia Makoni, was a female adult who resided at the same address with that of the accused, she was accused’s wife. During the period between18 and 19 August 2018, at the said Plot 47 Zunidza Resettlement Area, the accused assaulted the deceased all over the body using an identified object. The deceased died on the spot. On 23 August 2018 Dr. Aisa Serrano Gomez carried not a post mortem examination of the deceased’s body and concluded that the cause of death was due to: hypovolemic shock severe haematoma in both thighs and multiple injuries and contusions. At the time of the commission of the offence, the accused was mentally disordered and unable to control himself, such that he lacked criminal responsibility. Dr. P. Mavunganidze a psychiatrist formulated the expert opinion that the accused was mentally challenged at the time of the alleged offence, and further pointed out that accused is now fit to stand trial. The state proceeded to produce the following exhibits by consent of the defence. The psychiatrist report, exh 1 Post-mortem report exh 2. Having looked at the evidence led and exhibits produced by the state, and further looking at the statement of agreed facts we are of the agreed view that this is a suitable case for the return of a special verdict to the effect that the accused is not guilty by reason of insanity as contemplated in s 29 (2) of the Mental Health Act [Chapter 15:12]. Accordingly the following order is returned: In terms of s 29 (2) (a) of the Mental Health Act, [Chapter 15:02] the accused person is committed to Chikurubi Psychiatric Unit, until he is discharged by a competent authority. National Prosecuting Authority, state’s legal practitioners Zimbabwe Lawyers for Human Rights, accused’s legal practitioners

Similar Cases

S v Pfumbwa (CRB 42 of 2019; HMT 1 of 2020) [2019] ZWMSVHC 81 (26 November 2019)
[2019] ZWMSVHC 81High Court of Zimbabwe (Masvingo)100% similar
S v Mafake (CRB 29 of 2019; HMT 52 of 2019) [2019] ZWMTHC 52 (16 August 2019)
[2019] ZWMTHC 52High Court of Zimbabwe (Mutare)92% similar
S v Guvheya (CRB 14 of 2019; HMT 30 of 2019) [2019] ZWMTHC 30 (21 May 2019)
[2019] ZWMTHC 30High Court of Zimbabwe (Mutare)91% similar
S v Dhliwayo (CRB 28 of 2019; HMT 60 of 2019) [2019] ZWMTHC 60 (23 July 2019)
[2019] ZWMTHC 60High Court of Zimbabwe (Mutare)90% similar
S v Kudoma (CRB 19 of 2019; HMT 51 of 2019) [2019] ZWMTHC 51 (9 July 2019)
[2019] ZWMTHC 51High Court of Zimbabwe (Mutare)89% similar

Discussion