africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2019] ZWMTHC 30Zimbabwe

S v Guvheya (CRB 14 of 2019; HMT 30 of 2019) [2019] ZWMTHC 30 (21 May 2019)

High Court of Zimbabwe (Mutare)
21 May 2019
Home J, Journals J, Muzenda J

Headnotes

Academic papers

Judgment

2 HMT 30-19 CRB 14/19 THE STATE versus JONES GUVHEYA HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE MUZENDA J MUTARE, 21 May 2019 Criminal Trial (Mental Health Act 15:12) ASSESSORS: 1. Dr Sana 2. Mr Chagonda M Musarurwa, for the State B Majamanda, for the Accused MUZENDA J: The accused was arraigned before us on a charge of murder and attempted murder as defined in s 47 (1) (a) or (b) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. The state alleged that on 20 December 2017 and at Guvheya homestead, Nyatsanza Village, Chief Mutasa, the accused unlawfully caused the death of Eugenia Guvheya by assaulting her with an axe handle all over the body intending to kill her or realising that there was a real risk or possibility that his conduct might cause death and continued to engage in that conduct despite the risk or possibility thereby causing severe injuries from which the said Eugenia Guvheya died. On the second count it is alleged that on the same fateful date the accused unlawfully attempted to cause the death of Christina Chidhakwa by assaulting her with an axe on the left side of the head thereby causing severe injury from which the said Christina Chidhakwa could have died. When the 2 charges were put to the accused, he indicated to court that he admits what happened but that it occurred when he was mentally challenged. As a result pleas of not guilty were entered. The state and defence counsel advised the court that they had taken a position informed by the nature of accused’s plea and the affidavit of Dr Patience Mavunganidze, a psychiatrist, to proceed in terms of S 29 of the Mental Health Act [Chapter 15:12]. The affidavit of Dr P Mavunganidze was tendered as evidence and was accepted by the court as exh 1 by consent. A statement of agreed facts was tendered as an exhibit, it summarises the events as follows: On 20 December 2017 at Guvheya homestead, Nyatsanza Village, Chief Mutasa, the accused assaulted the deceased with an axe handle all over the body. The deceased sustained severe injuries which caused her death. The accused went on and attempted to cause death of Christina Chidhakwa by assaulting her with an axe on the left side of the head thereby causing severe injuries from which the said Christina Chidhakwa could have died. Christina Chidhakwa was rushed to Bonda Mission Hospital for treatment and a medical report was compiled. The deceased’s body was conveyed to Parirenyatwa Hospital Mortuary where a post-mortem examination was conducted by Dr Roberto Trecu. He concluded that the cause of death was due to (a) traumatic shock (b) spine and ribs fractures haemoperitaemic (c) multiple traumas due to assault. At the time of the commission of the offence the accused was mentally disordered and unable to control himself such that he lacked criminal responsibility. The account given in the summary of the state case reflects a horrendous unprovoked assault consistent with a mental disorder in view of the fact that the deceased was accused person’s grandmother. Complainant Christina Chidhakwa is her mother. The state further produced the following by consent of the defence counsel: Post-mortem reportMedical reportCertificates of weightSketch planAxe handle and the axe. Given the statement of agreed facts, the psychiatrist medical evidence and the circumstances under which the offence was committed, the court agreed with the state and defence counsels that the matter be handled in terms of the Mental Health Act. The circumstances call for the return of a special verdict of Not Guilty because of insanity. It was also agreed between the state and the defence that accused still requires management, treatment and rehabilitation and in our view it would be improper to prematurely release him. Institutionalisation of the accused is ideal for his recovery. Accordingly, it is ordered that: Accused is found Not Guilty because of insanity.The accused be returned to prison for transfer to Chikurubi Psychiatric Unit or such other appropriate institution for treatment and management until discharge therefrom by a competent body. National Prosecuting Authority, state’s legal practitioners Khupe & Chijara Law Chambers, accused’s legal practitioners 2 HMT 30-19 CRB 14/19 2 HMT 30-19 CRB 14/19 THE STATE versus JONES GUVHEYA HIGH COURT OF ZIMBABWE MUZENDA J MUTARE, 21 May 2019 Criminal Trial (Mental Health Act 15:12) ASSESSORS: 1. Dr Sana 2. Mr Chagonda M Musarurwa, for the State B Majamanda, for the Accused MUZENDA J: The accused was arraigned before us on a charge of murder and attempted murder as defined in s 47 (1) (a) or (b) of the Criminal Law (Codification and Reform) Act [Chapter 9:23]. The state alleged that on 20 December 2017 and at Guvheya homestead, Nyatsanza Village, Chief Mutasa, the accused unlawfully caused the death of Eugenia Guvheya by assaulting her with an axe handle all over the body intending to kill her or realising that there was a real risk or possibility that his conduct might cause death and continued to engage in that conduct despite the risk or possibility thereby causing severe injuries from which the said Eugenia Guvheya died. On the second count it is alleged that on the same fateful date the accused unlawfully attempted to cause the death of Christina Chidhakwa by assaulting her with an axe on the left side of the head thereby causing severe injury from which the said Christina Chidhakwa could have died. When the 2 charges were put to the accused, he indicated to court that he admits what happened but that it occurred when he was mentally challenged. As a result pleas of not guilty were entered. The state and defence counsel advised the court that they had taken a position informed by the nature of accused’s plea and the affidavit of Dr Patience Mavunganidze, a psychiatrist, to proceed in terms of S 29 of the Mental Health Act [Chapter 15:12]. The affidavit of Dr P Mavunganidze was tendered as evidence and was accepted by the court as exh 1 by consent. A statement of agreed facts was tendered as an exhibit, it summarises the events as follows: On 20 December 2017 at Guvheya homestead, Nyatsanza Village, Chief Mutasa, the accused assaulted the deceased with an axe handle all over the body. The deceased sustained severe injuries which caused her death. The accused went on and attempted to cause death of Christina Chidhakwa by assaulting her with an axe on the left side of the head thereby causing severe injuries from which the said Christina Chidhakwa could have died. Christina Chidhakwa was rushed to Bonda Mission Hospital for treatment and a medical report was compiled. The deceased’s body was conveyed to Parirenyatwa Hospital Mortuary where a post-mortem examination was conducted by Dr Roberto Trecu. He concluded that the cause of death was due to (a) traumatic shock (b) spine and ribs fractures haemoperitaemic (c) multiple traumas due to assault. At the time of the commission of the offence the accused was mentally disordered and unable to control himself such that he lacked criminal responsibility. The account given in the summary of the state case reflects a horrendous unprovoked assault consistent with a mental disorder in view of the fact that the deceased was accused person’s grandmother. Complainant Christina Chidhakwa is her mother. The state further produced the following by consent of the defence counsel: Post-mortem report Medical report Certificates of weight Sketch plan Axe handle and the axe. Given the statement of agreed facts, the psychiatrist medical evidence and the circumstances under which the offence was committed, the court agreed with the state and defence counsels that the matter be handled in terms of the Mental Health Act. The circumstances call for the return of a special verdict of Not Guilty because of insanity. It was also agreed between the state and the defence that accused still requires management, treatment and rehabilitation and in our view it would be improper to prematurely release him. Institutionalisation of the accused is ideal for his recovery. Accordingly, it is ordered that: Accused is found Not Guilty because of insanity. The accused be returned to prison for transfer to Chikurubi Psychiatric Unit or such other appropriate institution for treatment and management until discharge therefrom by a competent body. National Prosecuting Authority, state’s legal practitioners Khupe & Chijara Law Chambers, accused’s legal practitioners

Similar Cases

S v Pfumbwa (CRB 42 of 2019; HMT 1 of 2020) [2019] ZWMTHC 1 (26 November 2019)
[2019] ZWMTHC 1High Court of Zimbabwe (Mutare)91% similar
S v Pfumbwa (CRB 42 of 2019; HMT 1 of 2020) [2019] ZWMSVHC 81 (26 November 2019)
[2019] ZWMSVHC 81High Court of Zimbabwe (Masvingo)91% similar
S v Dhliwayo (CRB 28 of 2019; HMT 60 of 2019) [2019] ZWMTHC 60 (23 July 2019)
[2019] ZWMTHC 60High Court of Zimbabwe (Mutare)88% similar
S v Mafake (CRB 29 of 2019; HMT 52 of 2019) [2019] ZWMTHC 52 (16 August 2019)
[2019] ZWMTHC 52High Court of Zimbabwe (Mutare)87% similar
S v Kudoma (CRB 19 of 2019; HMT 51 of 2019) [2019] ZWMTHC 51 (9 July 2019)
[2019] ZWMTHC 51High Court of Zimbabwe (Mutare)86% similar

Discussion