Kaumba v Ismail [2018] UGSC 52 (27 March 2018)

# Kaumba v Ismail [2018] UGSC 52 (27 March 2018) [ Share this document on WhatsApp opens in new tab __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Kaumba+v+Ismail+%5B2018%5D+UGSC+52+%2827+March+2018%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2018%2F52%2Feng%402018-03-27) [ Share this document on X opens in new tab __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Kaumba+v+Ismail+%5B2018%5D+UGSC+52+%2827+March+2018%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2018%2F52%2Feng%402018-03-27) [ Share this document on Facebook opens in new tab __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/52/eng@2018-03-27) [ Share this document on LinkedIn opens in new tab __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/52/eng@2018-03-27) [ Share this document by email __](mailto:?subject=Take%20a%20look%20at%20this%20document%20from%20ULII:%20Kaumba%20v%20Ismail%20\[2018\]%20UGSC%2052%20\(27%20%E2%80%A6&body=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/52/eng@2018-03-27) __Save [ Download PDF (650.1 KB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/52/eng@2018-03-27/source) Report a problem ##### Is there something wrong with this document? Problem category *Incorrect informationMissing informationNo PDF downloadDocument is emptyDocument is not accessible on my deviceOther What's the problem? * Your email address * CancelReport problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (650.1 KB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/52/eng@2018-03-27/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Kaumba v Ismail [2018] UGSC 52 (27 March 2018) Copy citation __Save * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Kaumba v Ismail [2018] UGSC 52 (27 March 2018) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2018] UGSC 52 Copy Court [Supreme Court of Uganda](/en/judgments/UGSC/) Judgment date 27 March 2018 Language English Summary ###### Flynote * Civil Procedure|Injunctions and interdicts Read full summary ###### Case summary The court held that it has inherent power to make such orders as may be necessary for achieving the end of justice or to prevent abuse of the process of Court. that given the presence of a notice of appeal and the substantive application with the imminent threat of execution, if the respondent alienates or disposes of the property, it would render the main application for a temporary injunction order nugatory. That the Interim Order sought by the applicant is to necessarily preserve the status quo until the substantive application for a temporary injunction is heard and determined. __ ##### Ask AI Ask questions and understand this document faster using AI. __Ask AI * * * Skip to document content **Loading PDF...** 100% This document is 650.1 KB. Do you want to load it? Load document ##### Error loading PDF Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF. Reload page [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2018/52/eng@2018-03-27/source.pdf) Error: #### __Related documents #### More documents like this one __Suggestions generated by AI. This feature is not currently available. ▲ To the top >