Omorio & Anor v Uganda [2013] UGSC 6 (1 March 2013)

# Omorio & Anor v Uganda [2013] UGSC 6 (1 March 2013) [ Share this document on WhatsApp opens in new tab __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Omorio+%26+Anor+v+Uganda+%5B2013%5D+UGSC+6+%281+March+2013%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2013%2F6%2Feng%402013-03-01) [ Share this document on X opens in new tab __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Omorio+%26+Anor+v+Uganda+%5B2013%5D+UGSC+6+%281+March+2013%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2013%2F6%2Feng%402013-03-01) [ Share this document on Facebook opens in new tab __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2013/6/eng@2013-03-01) [ Share this document on LinkedIn opens in new tab __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2013/6/eng@2013-03-01) [ Share this document by email __](mailto:?subject=Take%20a%20look%20at%20this%20document%20from%20ULII:%20Omorio%20&%20Anor%20v%20Uganda%20\[2013\]%20UGSC%20%E2%80%A6&body=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2013/6/eng@2013-03-01) __Save [ Download PDF (3.9 MB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2013/6/eng@2013-03-01/source) Report a problem ##### Is there something wrong with this document? Problem category *Incorrect informationMissing informationNo PDF downloadDocument is emptyDocument is not accessible on my deviceOther What's the problem? * Your email address * CancelReport problem __ * Share * [ Download PDF (3.9 MB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2013/6/eng@2013-03-01/source) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Omorio & Anor v Uganda [2013] UGSC 6 (1 March 2013) Copy citation __Save * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Omorio & Anor v Uganda [2013] UGSC 6 (1 March 2013) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2013] UGSC 6 Copy Court [Supreme Court of Uganda](/en/judgments/UGSC/) Judgment date 1 March 2013 Language English Summary ###### Flynote * Criminal law Read full summary ###### Case summary The court observed that the Court of Appeal had properly reevaluated the evidence when it found that the appellant had received print outs of phone records, signed for the gun from the police armory, had arrested the witnesses from hospital and took them to a lodge where they gave him the money and that though he had not gotten the money from its owner, he had taken the same from the witnesses who had been in possession. The court set aside the compensation order and reduced the tern of imprisonment to six years as the use of deadly weapon had not been proved. __ ##### Ask AI Ask questions and understand this document faster using AI. __Ask AI * * * Skip to document content **Loading PDF...** 100% This document is 3.9 MB. Do you want to load it? Load document ##### Error loading PDF Try reloading the page or downloading the PDF. Reload page [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2013/6/eng@2013-03-01/source.pdf) Error: #### __Related documents #### More documents like this one __Suggestions generated by AI. This feature is not currently available. ▲ To the top >