africa.lawBeta
SearchAsk AICollectionsJudgesCompareMemo
africa.law

Free access to African legal information. Legislation, case law, and regulatory documents from across the continent.

Resources

  • Legislation
  • Gazettes
  • Jurisdictions

Developers

  • API Documentation
  • Bulk Downloads
  • Data Sources
  • GitHub

Company

  • About
  • Contact
  • Terms of Use
  • Privacy Policy

Jurisdictions

  • Ghana
  • Kenya
  • Nigeria
  • South Africa
  • Tanzania
  • Uganda

© 2026 africa.law by Bhala. Open legal information for Africa.

Aggregating legal information from official government publications and public legal databases across the continent.

Back to search
Case Law[2006] UGSC 20Uganda

Okiror Leo and Anor v Uganda [2006] UGSC 20 (25 October 2006)

Supreme Court of Uganda

Judgment

# Okiror Leo and Anor v Uganda [2006] UGSC 20 (25 October 2006) [ Share this document on WhatsApp opens in new tab __](https://api.whatsapp.com/send?text=Okiror+Leo+and+Anor+v+Uganda+%5B2006%5D+UGSC+20+%2825+October+2006%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2006%2F20%2Feng%402006-10-25) [ Share this document on X opens in new tab __](https://twitter.com/intent/tweet?text=Okiror+Leo+and+Anor+v+Uganda+%5B2006%5D+UGSC+20+%2825+October+2006%29+-+https%3A%2F%2Fulii.org%2Fen%2Fakn%2Fug%2Fjudgment%2Fugsc%2F2006%2F20%2Feng%402006-10-25) [ Share this document on Facebook opens in new tab __](https://www.facebook.com/sharer/sharer.php?u=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2006/20/eng@2006-10-25) [ Share this document on LinkedIn opens in new tab __](https://www.linkedin.com/sharing/share-offsite/?url=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2006/20/eng@2006-10-25) [ Share this document by email __](mailto:?subject=Take%20a%20look%20at%20this%20document%20from%20ULII:%20Okiror%20Leo%20and%20Anor%20v%20Uganda%20\[2006\]%20%E2%80%A6&body=https://ulii.org/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2006/20/eng@2006-10-25) __Save [ Download RTF (17.1 KB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2006/20/eng@2006-10-25/source) Toggle dropdown * [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2006/20/eng@2006-10-25/source.pdf) Report a problem ##### Is there something wrong with this document? Problem category *Incorrect informationMissing informationNo PDF downloadDocument is emptyDocument is not accessible on my deviceOther What's the problem? * Your email address * CancelReport problem __ * Share * [ Download RTF (17.1 KB) ](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2006/20/eng@2006-10-25/source) * [Download PDF](/en/akn/ug/judgment/ugsc/2006/20/eng@2006-10-25/source.pdf) * * * * * Report a problem __ ##### Okiror Leo and Anor v Uganda [2006] UGSC 20 (25 October 2006) Copy citation __Save * __Document detail * __Related documents Citation Okiror Leo and Anor v Uganda [2006] UGSC 20 (25 October 2006) Copy Media Neutral Citation [2006] UGSC 20 Copy Court [Supreme Court of Uganda](/en/judgments/UGSC/) Judgment date 25 October 2006 Language English Summary ###### Flynote * Criminal law|Evidence Law|Evaluation of Evidence Read full summary ###### Case summary The court held that the trial judge did not err in admitting the two confession statements. Neither did the Court of Appeal err in upholding the decision of the trial judge. __ ##### Ask AI Ask questions and understand this document faster using AI. __Ask AI * * * Skip to document content **THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA** **IN THE SUPREME COURT OF UGANDA** **AT MENGO** **CORAM: TSEKOOKO, KAROKORA, MULENGA, KANYEIHAMBA, AND KATUREEBE, JJ.SC.** **CRIMINAL APPEAL No.01/2003.** BETWEEN 1. OKIROR LEO APPELLANTS 2. OJAL PETER VERSUS UGANDA RESPONDENT _**[Appeal from the decision of the Court of Appeal at Kampala (Manyindo, DCJ., Kato and Mpagi-Bahigeine,JJA) dated 14th December, 1999 in Criminal Appeal No. 11 of 1999]**_ _JUDGMENT OF THE COURT_ In the High Court, the appellants were charged, tried and convicted of murder of two people. Their appeals to the Court of Appeal were dismissed. They have now appealed to this Court and each filed a separate memorandum of appeal. Mr. Ojakol argued the appeal of the first appellant while Mr. Ssekabojja argued the appeal of the 2nd appellant. Both counsel challenged the admissibility in the trial court of confession statement made to the police by their respective clients. We did not find it necessary to hear Ms. Khisa, learned Senior Principal State Attorney. We have considered the judgments of the trial court and that of the Court of Appeal. We are fully satisfied that the trial judge did not err in admitting the two confession statements. Neither did the Court of Appeal err in upholding the decision of the trial judge. These appeals have no merit. We therefore dismiss them. **Dated this 25****th****day of October, 2006.** **J.W.N.TSEEKOOKO** **JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT.** **A.N.KAROKORA** **JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME****COURT** **J.N.MULENGA** **JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** **G.W.KANYEIHAMBA** **JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT** **B. KATUREEBE.** **JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME COURT.** #### __Related documents #### More documents like this one __Suggestions generated by AI. This feature is not currently available. ▲ To the top >

Similar Cases

Omorio & Anor v Uganda [2013] UGSC 6 (1 March 2013)
[2013] UGSC 6Supreme Court of Uganda88% similar
Kwijuka & anor v Uganda [2004] UGSC 41 (1 September 2004)
[2004] UGSC 41Supreme Court of Uganda85% similar
Osherura & Anor v Uganda (Criminal Appeal 50 of 2015) [2018] UGSC 24 (14 June 2018)
[2018] UGSC 24Supreme Court of Uganda83% similar
Otule Ateker Charles and Anor v Uganda [2005] UGSC 5 (2 March 2005)
[2005] UGSC 5Supreme Court of Uganda83% similar
Atyam Patrick and Anor v Uganda [2002] UGSC 30 (16 July 2002)
[2002] UGSC 30Supreme Court of Uganda83% similar

Discussion